Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Biglaw Very Low Bonus for Pregnant Associate"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Lesson #1 for you dinosaurs. Do not threaten a woman, especially a pregnant woman, with bogus ostracism if she were to challenge the bonus decision that puts her at odds with her peers. [/quote] Yes. Quite so. This is a lesson that has been demonstrated. We are all now trembling in fear that a semi-employed pregnant associate who didn’t meet her minimum hours requirement (and whom we don’t know) may request reconsideration of her bonus. At a firm we don’t work for. What? Honestly the OP, while seemingly immature and in need of some advice (which she received), has responded more or less reasonably. Probing for alternatives, what if I did this, etc. This one and maybe another who parachuted in to make this a women’s and/or trans rights issue? Bonkers. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
