“Stop excusing women. Criminalize abortion.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I demand protection at conception"

These were signs at the March for Life rally in Richmond yesterday, led by Youngkin.

Youngkin still wants to come after women's rights. Republicans are relentless and will not stop until they've forced their religious extremism on everyone else.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/virginia/articles/2024-02-21/youngkin-earle-sears-join-annual-anti-abortion-demonstration-in-richmond

NP. I appreciate that Youngkin is no longer hiding his pro-life anti-abortion views. No longer lying about his pro-life anti-abortion views.

If he has political aspirations, it's good to be clear about what you are for and against.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These boys better be doing their part to prevent abortion by totally abstaining from sex (no birth control is full proof!).

Gosh what losers.

Do you see their faces? I think that's enough proof they are abstaining.

Currently InCels, would be mass-shooters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

Maybe some day they will have wives and daughters who find their smiling faces about this reprehensible.
Or worse, maybe someday they will be party to a needed or wanted abortion.

Well, you want to abort the daughter so why do you care what she may think?

Every woman (and girl) should be able to make their own decision: if they want to be pregnant and if they want to become a mother. Immature, ignorant teens who have been brainwashed by their parents/teachers should not making that decision for them.

If they are immature, ignorant teens then why do you say every girl should make her own decision? You clearly think they are of an age that is not mature. You contradict yourself when it’s convenient for you.

If teenagers are not mature enough to make decisions about their own pregnancy, they are also not mature enough to be parents.

But, more to the point, the only people who should be making the decisions are (1) the pregnant person (2) the medical care providers. If you're not the pregnant person making the decision about their own pregnancy, or the medical care provider making the decision about whether or not to provide the medical care, then there are no decisions for you to make about that pregnancy.

You’re the one who said teens shouldn’t make that decision because of immaturity after you said the decision should be for a GIRL (immature teen as you said) or women to make.
You can’t have it both ways.

No, I'm not the poster who said that. You are responding to multiple posters. My position is that nobody gets to make that decision for somebody else.

Except they do and if you think parents haven’t been making that decision for kids for eons, you’ve got another thing coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

Maybe some day they will have wives and daughters who find their smiling faces about this reprehensible.
Or worse, maybe someday they will be party to a needed or wanted abortion.

Well, you want to abort the daughter so why do you care what she may think?

Every woman (and girl) should be able to make their own decision: if they want to be pregnant and if they want to become a mother. Immature, ignorant teens who have been brainwashed by their parents/teachers should not making that decision for them.

If they are immature, ignorant teens then why do you say every girl should make her own decision? You clearly think they are of an age that is not mature. You contradict yourself when it’s convenient for you.

If teenagers are not mature enough to make decisions about their own pregnancy, they are also not mature enough to be parents.

But, more to the point, the only people who should be making the decisions are (1) the pregnant person (2) the medical care providers. If you're not the pregnant person making the decision about their own pregnancy, or the medical care provider making the decision about whether or not to provide the medical care, then there are no decisions for you to make about that pregnancy.

You’re the one who said teens shouldn’t make that decision because of immaturity after you said the decision should be for a GIRL (immature teen as you said) or women to make.
You can’t have it both ways.

No, I'm not the poster who said that. You are responding to multiple posters. My position is that nobody gets to make that decision for somebody else.

Except they do and if you think parents haven’t been making that decision for kids for eons, you’ve got another thing coming.

The phrase is "you've got another think coming".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These boys better be doing their part to prevent abortion by totally abstaining from sex (no birth control is full proof!).

Gosh what losers.

Do you see their faces? I think that's enough proof they are abstaining.

Currently InCels, would be mass-shooters.

I don’t know what is so funny about mass shootings but something is wrong with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

Maybe some day they will have wives and daughters who find their smiling faces about this reprehensible.
Or worse, maybe someday they will be party to a needed or wanted abortion.

Well, you want to abort the daughter so why do you care what she may think?

Every woman (and girl) should be able to make their own decision: if they want to be pregnant and if they want to become a mother. Immature, ignorant teens who have been brainwashed by their parents/teachers should not making that decision for them.

If they are immature, ignorant teens then why do you say every girl should make her own decision? You clearly think they are of an age that is not mature. You contradict yourself when it’s convenient for you.

If teenagers are not mature enough to make decisions about their own pregnancy, they are also not mature enough to be parents.

But, more to the point, the only people who should be making the decisions are (1) the pregnant person (2) the medical care providers. If you're not the pregnant person making the decision about their own pregnancy, or the medical care provider making the decision about whether or not to provide the medical care, then there are no decisions for you to make about that pregnancy.

You’re the one who said teens shouldn’t make that decision because of immaturity after you said the decision should be for a GIRL (immature teen as you said) or women to make.
You can’t have it both ways.

No, I'm not the poster who said that. You are responding to multiple posters. My position is that nobody gets to make that decision for somebody else.

Except they do and if you think parents haven’t been making that decision for kids for eons, you’ve got another thing coming.

The phrase is "you've got another think coming".

Yeah, yeah, yeah. It’s often mistakingly said. It implies the same thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These boys better be doing their part to prevent abortion by totally abstaining from sex (no birth control is full proof!).

Gosh what losers.

Do you see their faces? I think that's enough proof they are abstaining.

Currently InCels, would be mass-shooters.

You pretend to care about mass shooting victims but make cracks about it.
I bet you pretend to care about women too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"I demand protection at conception"

These were signs at the March for Life rally in Richmond yesterday, led by Youngkin.

Youngkin still wants to come after women's rights. Republicans are relentless and will not stop until they've forced their religious extremism on everyone else.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/virginia/articles/2024-02-21/youngkin-earle-sears-join-annual-anti-abortion-demonstration-in-richmond

Yes, love. We know. He said it during the campaign but they fooled a bunch of mommies into thinking their snowflakes were being made to feel guilty about their skin color in schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Great. I demand DNA tests for all newborns. Have fun with 18 years of child support, fellas.

No, child support should begin at conception.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Abortion marches are 90% Catholic/christian school trips. The kids are of mixed conviction but they all want to go on a field trip. They visit DC and all the usual sights and then they have to do the march for life. I don’t think most of them think about it very much tbh. They’re already on board with or going along with the schooling so it’s just more of the same.

That ... isn't reassuring

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make abortion a federal right until 16 weeks. If states want more than that, that’s their issue and they can decide for the voters of that state. But everyone gets 16 weeks, minimum.

Problem solved.

No, problem solved.

More, or less?

I’d go as low as 10 weeks. Maybe as high as 21.

That seems perfectly reasonable

No such thing as "reasonable" in terms of limiting this. It's between a woman and her doctor, the end. No limits. At all. And the men who insist there need to be need to be dragged out back and forced to have their scrotums separated from their bodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion marches are 90% Catholic/christian school trips. The kids are of mixed conviction but they all want to go on a field trip. They visit DC and all the usual sights and then they have to do the march for life. I don’t think most of them think about it very much tbh. They’re already on board with or going along with the schooling so it’s just more of the same.

Is that Bishop O'Connell right up front?

Shocking they couldn't find girls to march. Hopefully these boys get famous around campus

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

I wouldn’t hire them

That’s because you won’t have the ability to. You will work for them.

Sounds like the O'Connell kids are back from Richmond, trolling a mommy website during lunch.

You aren't mature/informed enough to have an adult conversation, let alone make healthcare decisions for millions of women.

Never heard that playground retort before. Very original.

How else would you explain the earlier comment that sounds immature even for a HS student? Maybe a MS student?

Calling anyone and everyone immature who has different views and opinions from you doesn’t make them immature. It indicates you are in fact the immature one.

A: this will be a regret for these boys in the future.
B: Why?
A: I wouldn’t hire them
B: That’s because you won’t have the ability to. You will work for them.

That's not a "different view or opinion". That's simply a childish remark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion marches are 90% Catholic/christian school trips. The kids are of mixed conviction but they all want to go on a field trip. They visit DC and all the usual sights and then they have to do the march for life. I don’t think most of them think about it very much tbh. They’re already on board with or going along with the schooling so it’s just more of the same.

Is that Bishop O'Connell right up front?

Shocking they couldn't find girls to march. Hopefully these boys get famous around campus

The girls were off to the sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first thought about this is everything lives on the internet forever and there's no doubt in my mind this will be a regret for these boys in the future.

Why?

Maybe some day they will have wives and daughters who find their smiling faces about this reprehensible.
Or worse, maybe someday they will be party to a needed or wanted abortion.

Well, you want to abort the daughter so why do you care what she may think?

Every woman (and girl) should be able to make their own decision: if they want to be pregnant and if they want to become a mother. Immature, ignorant teens who have been brainwashed by their parents/teachers should not making that decision for them.

If they are immature, ignorant teens then why do you say every girl should make her own decision? You clearly think they are of an age that is not mature. You contradict yourself when it’s convenient for you.

Women should always have autonomy over their own body, even as a girl/teen.

You really need that spelled out for you?

You really need it spelled out to you? You can’t call and oppress one group of an age too young and immature to make decisions and then contradict and say another group of the same age to make decisions.

I said they can't make decisions for others. I guess you do need it spelled out.