a master thread of actual groomers

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you’re worried about “grooming,” aka child sex abuse, the absolute worst thing you can do is leave your kids with adults in a religious organization or religious private school. On a per capita basis for sex abuse, those two types of organizations are - by far - the worst.

Giving your kids a smart phone is also a terrible idea if you’re worried about grooming.


Do you have data to support this? Unfortunately the largest category of abusers of children per capita are family members.

No, that PP is right. The child is likely to know their abuser, but it’s not family as frequently as you’d think.



https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens


The PP said church or church school is the greatest threat to kids being abused? Are you seriously trying to say the # of kids who are abused in church is greater than 34%?

Hon I think you’re struggling with statistics here. No, no one is saying that 34% or more of children who attend church are sexually assaulted or harassed. They’re saying that of the children who are sexually assaulted or harassed, 34% of them are victimized by family and 59% are victimized by acquaintances: neighbors, church leaders in school because Ron Desantis said they were good for kids, your best friend’s father.


Your political partisanship is clouding your judgment. Child predators live on both sides of the aisle.


There are institutions that coddle, protect, and hide child predators - like churches - that are associated with the right. You really just don't find that on the left in the same way. Yeah I know BUT PRIDE - but there aren't actually stories about pride organizations being cover for sexual predation against children. Yeah, there are some photos of kids at pride that don't look fantastic - but I have never in my life heard any actual accusation that a child was predated on at a pride event, and especially not that a kid was predated on and then a pride organization covered up what happened and protected the predator not the kid.

Epstein seems like an equal opportunity corrupter, if you want to drag him in here. No one of any party came out looking good from that. But I don't think that one example justifies any BOTH SIDESism here.


Why are you talking about pride events? Did someone claim that children are getting assaulted at pride events? Are you trying to equate a pride parade to attendance at church or religious schools?

Take a look at Hollywood. Everyone knows that child stars are exploited and abused and it is covered up. You have posted zero evidence that child abusers are more likely to be conservatives.

I would like to see the data on this. Maybe you are right, but just saying so based on your feelings doesn't make it reality. You are just as blinded by your partisanship as the right wingers that you think you are so different from. I'm sure that it's comforting to believe that no one from your team could be an abuser, but that is just not true. Wake up.


I think the math works out to support it, besides the anecdotes. If 80-90% of all pedophiles are men, and 54% of men are Republican or Republican leaning, then there are more Republican pedophiles than there are Democratic or Democratic leaning ones.
Anonymous
Man what a story. Did his deed in public. I can't imagine what went on at home.

Anonymous
Another Republican groomer.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/federal-jury-finds-anton-tony-lazzaro-guilty-all-counts-child-sex-trafficking-conspiracy
Federal Jury Finds Anton “Tony” Lazzaro Guilty on All Counts in Child Sex Trafficking Conspiracy

Some photos of GOP operative Lazzaro


When the prosecution puts up an exhibit of your text saying "RIP Jeffery Epstein my brother" during your child sex trafficking case you know you're going to jail.


Anonymous
Did anybody post the trans House member yet?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.


Well if what is alleged is true, then I am really glad she's being held accountable and facing justice.

But the headline on that tweet you shared is really badly written and misleading.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.


Well if what is alleged is true, then I am really glad she's being held accountable and facing justice.

But the headline on that tweet you shared is really badly written and misleading.


There’s nothing misleading about it if you actually took the time to read the article.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.


Well if what is alleged is true, then I am really glad she's being held accountable and facing justice.

But the headline on that tweet you shared is really badly written and misleading.


There’s nothing misleading about it if you actually took the time to read the article.


I looked at the headline, which shouted that this person is a member of the US House of Representatives, and knew that this publication is not committed to truth. I saw no reason to click the link.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.


Well if what is alleged is true, then I am really glad she's being held accountable and facing justice.

But the headline on that tweet you shared is really badly written and misleading.


There’s nothing misleading about it if you actually took the time to read the article.


I looked at the headline, which shouted that this person is a member of the US House of Representatives, and knew that this publication is not committed to truth. I saw no reason to click the link.


You know what actually? Now that I know the actual story, perhaps the headline isn't as misleading as I thought.

It's a bad story, and good that this person has been arrested.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did anybody post the trans House member yet?




There is no trans member of the US House of Representatives. I don't know what this story is, but it's not what the headline says it is.


Stacie Laughton, born Barry Charles Laughton Jr., was a Democratic representative for the New Hampshire House, winning his last election in November of 2022. But Laughton resigned less than one month after winning the election following scrutiny for being charged with the violation of a stalking order that had been placed against him by a woman in his community. Laughton violated the order just one month before he was elected.

While Laughton is still facing his stalking charges, he was arrested again this past Tuesday. This time, on charges involving the distribution of child sexual abuse materials.


Well if what is alleged is true, then I am really glad she's being held accountable and facing justice.

But the headline on that tweet you shared is really badly written and misleading.


There’s nothing misleading about it if you actually took the time to read the article.


I looked at the headline, which shouted that this person is a member of the US House of Representatives, and knew that this publication is not committed to truth. I saw no reason to click the link.


You know what actually? Now that I know the actual story, perhaps the headline isn't as misleading as I thought.

It's a bad story, and good that this person has been arrested.

This is the difference between Democrats and Republicans: Democrats genuinely want all child predators in prison where they belong and Republicans… well they put a lot of asterisks and caveats on there as to which ones are truly predators and which ones are holy and which ones are just attracted to hot youngsters.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

There it is.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

There it is.


Let me guess. It's in the basement of an actual pizza place? It was always projection with these guys!
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: