Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is he going to trial? I don’t know how these types of cases usually play out, but can’t imagine many juries are sympathetic to someone driving a BMW going 80 in a 35 near a school…
And I heard he got a VERY expensive criminal defense attorney so he's not looking to back down. He has to be looking to to pin it on the SUV driver. Otherwise, why blow money on an expensive defense attorney.
He is spending money on an expensive lawyer b/c JAIL is a real possibility when 2 people died. His lawyer(s) will of course try to get the jury to sympathize with being a young person and making a single mistake. They only need ONE juror to feel sorry for the nice young man with so much in his future. Just one juror refusing to convict means a hung jury and the CA will give him a deal that involves a lot of "community service" and probation. They are paying a high priced (and presumably experienced) lawyer to pay his way out of jail.
Yup, all of this. If the family has the money, it's worth the gamble. The driver of the SUV actually did something illegal and dangerous (pulling into opposing traffic and stopping in the middle of the road), so the defendant's lawyer is going to argue contributory negligence.
Sadly, I think he has a very good chance at getting away with this. You only need one sympathetic male driver on the jury who probably speeds a little much. If you're the defense attorney, you are trying to get the jury to be composed of young men. You're tossing moms and grandmas off the jury.