Where, in the 2 1/2 miles (at its widest) between the beltway and DC/PG lines, do you have 40 acres for a new HS? |
They seem to have no problem providing high schools in the wealthy part of the county but always come up short in the less affluent areas. |
If it were remotely important to the board, they'd find a way to creative problem solve. I'm certain many densely populated cities manage to provide public high schools in urban areas with less than 40 acres of land. |
The idea that there is a bias against Takoma Park residents is laughable. |
I suppose they could turn the current SSIMS back into a high school. But then SSIMS would have to go somewhere. |
I would count Blair as close-in east county. It literally abuts the beltway. What difference would it make if it were just inside the belway vs outside. |
SCES too. |
The county did not "put" the "low-income housing" there. The housing was there. It remained comparatively affordable. So people who could afford it moved in. |
But Whitman and BCC clearly occupy land that isn't expensive
|
FALSE |
Meanwhile parents who live across the street complain their kids are bused elsewhere since its boundary has nothing to do with its location. |
Woodward is squeezing onto a relic of a site. All the recent upcounty high schools were built on developer donated land. How much would 40 acres in TP go for? How many houses would have to be razed? |
That’s funny. |
Yeah but middle schools are usually smaller so that would have been easier to find a spot for SSIMS, in theory. But yeah, the window for building a new high school inside the beltway has probably passed. I think there were some opportunities (e.g., during the whole DTSS "revitalization" 20-25 years ago). There wasn't enough foresight that the trend of declining enrollments were going to tip back the other way as the neighborhoods turned over and development around the metro stations shot up. |
True, but they build up. MCPS do MCPS. It is like talking to a brick wall. |