Actually 17 year olds that will be 18 on Election Day can vote in a primary in Virginia. |
DP. From what I recall, the FCDC didn't require teens to be 17 to participate in the endorsement process in 2019. There were lots of teenagers who signed up late in the spring and were responsible for Omeish getting an endorsement. She got more votes than both Sizemore Heizer and Moon, which in retrospect is just crazy absurd. |
I live in Fairfax and am not at all surprised she was elected over others. The majority of parents here prefer equity etc over education. |
She should never have been elected in the first place. You can decide, later this year, if she stays on the Board. |
That's different than saying it was "evil." That was an incredibly bloody battle on both sides. Apparently both sides thought is was worth fighting the battle. |
| Do you think she got Iwo Jima mixed up with Hiroshima? Then I could see her point. |
Nope. I thought that, too--because it was logical. But, she was asked and doubled down on Iwo Jima. |
Note that even the excuse that supposedly gets her off the hook is polemical and would indicate she gets easily mixed up. Yale apparently admits a lot of people who are just not that bright. |
Wtf? She exactly doubled down. She did not say that she misspoke and meant to reference Hiroshima as some people thought may have happened. She made it clear she intentionally referenced Iwo Jima. |
This Japanese have no leg to stand on when they provoked America here. War is chaotic. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm sure at the time this island seemed important. |
|
Frankly I don't know from watching the video what she was trying to say. Humans are capable of doing some bad things. Like bombing Pearl Harbor in an unprovoked sneak attack, that kind of thing? She does know that Iwo Jima was a battle during a declared war, right?
Really, I don't blame her for saying it as much as for her inability to make any kind of coherent point. Does anyone understand what she was trying to say? |
A typical Omeish comment is a word salad that has two elements: * First, a relatively banal thought with which few would disagree (for example, students should get involved in their communities, the conditions for Palestinians in the West Bank are abysmal, the internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII was wrong). * Second, a weird twist that pushes it over the top with odd word choices and unnecessary hyperbole (for example, students should wage "jihad," asserting that Israel "desecrates the Holy Land," and throwing Iwo Jima into the mix when discussing the Day of Remembrance (which is about the internment of Japanese-Americans) and declaring it a "record" for "human evil"). It's intended to be attention-grabbing and to demonstrate to Omeish's allies how progressive she is. But as often as not she seems to be making it up on the fly and it just comes across as ignorant and obnoxious. The problem for the rest of us is that we gave her a platform to spout her nonsense, and that needs to come to an end this fall. |
| I'm happy every time she opens her mouth. With each utterance, she makes herself more unelectable and more toxic. She's going to grad school for public policy, if not for this stent, she might have gotten herself on the ballot for higher office than school board. |
+1. Well stated. Everything Omeish says is ideological and calculated to demonstrate her progressive political position, but it comes out as incoherent and leaving everyone scratching their heads trying to figure out what she meant. Her contributions to the FCPS school board and the excellence of FCPS as a school district are non-existent. She does not belong on a school board. |
Correct. No need to judge her based on her her father’s actions. Abrar Omeish does have a mind of her own: https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/opinions/a-call-to-censure-and-remove-abrar-omeish/article_0dbc68f6-172c-11ec-8fa9-03928393c39b.html |