| You all vote straight ticket progressive year after year. What makes you think you can recall anyone on the council? Nadeau's main constituency literally believes that since 25 year old brains are not fully developed then they should not be punished for violent crimes. |
Well her staff included at least one 24 year old overpaid criminal, whose job it was to filter her constituent emails "constituent services". https://dcist.com/story/19/08/13/staffer-in-councilmembers-office-arrested-after-shooting-outside-marijuana-pop-up/
After that, I stopped emailing her about anything substantial or related to crime, because it just didn't feel safe to out oneself as not being supportive of 24 year olds shooting illegal guns indiscriminately down the block to protect the proceeds of their drug deals. |
The lack of alternative is the issue. I just posted about her criminal staffer but the potential candidates I can think of are actually worse because they have a much longer history of doing nothing for families or safety, and if any of them is a part of this effort, they'd have gone years doing nothing worthy for the neighborhood but working towards taking Nadeau's position, and at that point I'd just keep her. |
Once again, it won’t work. She’s still more supported than not. Maybe she’s done after this, but she will finish her term unless she chooses to leave |
This doesn’t sound believable at all. |
Well, she’s also an overpaid criminal |
I don’t think we care this time. It’s recall first |
Criminal how? I don't see it. I'm pissed she hired 24 y/o thugs and trusted them with handling our emails, which at the time I thought also explained why she wasn't responsive to issues that seemed urgent to us, but how is she a criminal? |
Yeah, I care. I'm not going to support a recall without a sense of the likely replacement. |
|
I think you work for Nadeau.
I don’t know if she’s engaged in criminal activity per se but she’s had many shady dealings. Recall Nadeau. |
| If Brianne or any of her staffers are reading DCUM, the next time you’re at a community forum please pay attention and don’t bury yourself in emails or take notes. Bring a staffer to do that so you can stay engaged. |
| It doesn’t serve her to be engaged. Then she’d have to do something |
You know I don't. I just posted bigger actual dirt and more sincere disappointment than your OP. But it's ridiculous and kind of shady to basically call someone 'criminal, but not criminal per se' with absolutely nothing behind the accusation. Kind of trumpish, really, very 'lock her up'. Being completely in the dark about who would fill in the void after a recall is also not going to inspire. |
|
That’s nonsense. She started as she meant to go on with a free loan for herself. Today most of her $$$ comes from the developers with interests in Ward 1. She’s shady as all get out
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/size-of-interest-free-home-loan-for-dc-council-candidate-questioned-by-opponent/2014/03/25/08192f32-b2bd-11e3-b899-20667de76985_story.html |
| She’s awful. Recall it is, if I have to gather each signature myself. And I have at least 137 neighbors feel the same |