Emory, Tulane, WashU

[Anonymous]

Wash u is the most selective on that list, and has the best reputation if that is what drives your preference. What are your child's interests? Let them pick. One of the best lessons we can teach our children is that they CAN be SUCCESSFUL and HAPPY in more that one situation. There is not a bad answer to which one they pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tulane is a good safety for kids aiming for WashU or Emory. Tulane usually accepts those kids EA and offers. The education is great at all 3 but in terms of selectivity, Tulane is a lower level. Vanderbilt is more like WashU or Emory.

That isn’t necessarily true, Tulane practices pretty aggressive yield protection at our private for high stats kids. It doesn’t want to be a safety.

The thing about Tulane is that if it your top choice and can do ED, it is definitely the least selective. But even if you are a strong candidate, it's going to be tough to get in RD - so not a good candidate as a safety. WashU and Emory are definitely more selective than Tulane but ED helps A LOT for all three schools.

[Anonymous]

There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Didn't you just do exactly what you accuse others of doing ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Just realized that you were referring to the female rights zealot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Didn't you just do exactly what you accuse others of doing ?

No, just stating the facts without expressing my opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Didn't you just do exactly what you accuse others of doing ?

No, just stating the facts without expressing my opinion.

You wrote that the three schools "...are very liberal/progressive."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Just realized that you were referring to the female rights zealot.

LOL no how about a realistic parent that understands sending any college students to red states when they are going to hunt our daughters and are going to destroy those schools with their religious rights crap.

They are not playing with women's rights they are coming for all of them.

Wake the hell up people.

You want to risk your kids life this is not going away it is going to only get worse.

Great awesome parenting sending a kid to a red state right now is just dumb plain old dumb. OOS $ for utter crap.

This is not political this is life and reality.

[Anonymous]

More impotent rage from PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Didn't you just do exactly what you accuse others of doing ?

No, just stating the facts without expressing my opinion.

You wrote that the three schools "...are very liberal/progressive."

Which is objectively true. If you are saying that this statement is like what was posted at 15:14, then you have a reading comprehension problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's always someone bound to inject politics into a question like this. For what it's worth, all three of these colleges are very liberal/progressive.

Just realized that you were referring to the female rights zealot.

LOL no how about a realistic parent that understands sending any college students to red states when they are going to hunt our daughters and are going to destroy those schools with their religious rights crap.

They are not playing with women's rights they are coming for all of them.

Wake the hell up people.

You want to risk your kids life this is not going away it is going to only get worse.

Great awesome parenting sending a kid to a red state right now is just dumb plain old dumb. OOS $ for utter crap.

This is not political this is life and reality.

Er, are you off your meds again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MO has some of the most restrictive laws right now.

And they are now debating on the ankle monitoring and bounty hunting of women. It will pass.

There is no way anyone should be sending a kid to Wash U right now.

Poo poo this all you want think I am crazy sure go ahead. I am not wrong.

MO just passed clothing requirements for it's house of reps if you think they are stopping there you are not paying attention.

Josh Hawley wants women in his state to stay home be barefoot and pregnant. If they vote him in again yeah MO is screwed.

You are smearing poo poo all over your own walls with this nonsense. Please seek help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MO has some of the most restrictive laws right now.

And they are now debating on the ankle monitoring and bounty hunting of women. It will pass.

There is no way anyone should be sending a kid to Wash U right now.

Poo poo this all you want think I am crazy sure go ahead. I am not wrong.

MO just passed clothing requirements for it's house of reps if you think they are stopping there you are not paying attention.

Josh Hawley wants women in his state to stay home be barefoot and pregnant. If they vote him in again yeah MO is screwed.

Whut?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wash u is the most selective on that list, and has the best reputation if that is what drives your preference. What are your child's interests? Let them pick. One of the best lessons we can teach our children is that they CAN be SUCCESSFUL and HAPPY in more that one situation. There is not a bad answer to which one they pick.

WashU doesn't have a better rep than Emory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wash u is the most selective on that list, and has the best reputation if that is what drives your preference. What are your child's interests? Let them pick. One of the best lessons we can teach our children is that they CAN be SUCCESSFUL and HAPPY in more that one situation. There is not a bad answer to which one they pick.

WashU doesn't have a better rep than Emory.

Emory doesn’t even have its own school of engineering