Petition to bring back SROs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are tons of literature and data about Montgomery County SROs that say otherwise. And why would it be a bad thing to provide principals with resources who can actually help them? Why would you take that away? Aren't we supposed to support Principals so that they can effectively run their schools and provide a safe environment for students and staff?

There are studies about the effectiveness of SROs in Montgomery County? I haven't seen any, could you link to them please?

MoCo won't do that because the results would go against their progressive objectives.

The BOE attempted to study it, but Elrich moved forward with removing SROs before the study could be completed. The numbers don't like. There has been an uptick in violence.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2021/02/02/county-state-lawmakers-battle-over-school-resource-officers-intensifies/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

Or the violence is not reported because progressives fear that it makes removing SROs look bad. See how that works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

so they shouldn't publicize violence in our schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are tons of literature and data about Montgomery County SROs that say otherwise. And why would it be a bad thing to provide principals with resources who can actually help them? Why would you take that away? Aren't we supposed to support Principals so that they can effectively run their schools and provide a safe environment for students and staff?

There are studies about the effectiveness of SROs in Montgomery County? I haven't seen any, could you link to them please?

MoCo won't do that because the results would go against their progressive objectives.

The BOE attempted to study it, but Elrich moved forward with removing SROs before the study could be completed. The numbers don't like. There has been an uptick in violence.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2021/02/02/county-state-lawmakers-battle-over-school-resource-officers-intensifies/

So are there studies, or aren't there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

There's no way you have kids in MCPS. Your whole MO is just to give cover and shelter for any criticism MCPS gets.

What do you gain from this shilling?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

I guess if you hate funding public education, making schools prison-like is a high priority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

You know what sounds a lot like prison? A place where people openly abuse substances and violence is tolerated and permitted.

Maybe it's not the parents who want better security and more stringent discipline in place who want to turn schools into "kid prison," but it's those who think that the current state is "just fine" or "not a big deal" that are interested in maintaining the kid prison dystopia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are tons of literature and data about Montgomery County SROs that say otherwise. And why would it be a bad thing to provide principals with resources who can actually help them? Why would you take that away? Aren't we supposed to support Principals so that they can effectively run their schools and provide a safe environment for students and staff?

There are studies about the effectiveness of SROs in Montgomery County? I haven't seen any, could you link to them please?

MoCo won't do that because the results would go against their progressive objectives.

The BOE attempted to study it, but Elrich moved forward with removing SROs before the study could be completed. The numbers don't like. There has been an uptick in violence.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2021/02/02/county-state-lawmakers-battle-over-school-resource-officers-intensifies/

So are there studies, or aren't there?

did you read the article?

They probably do but don't want to publicize it since it would go against the progressive agenda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

I guess if you hate funding public education, making schools prison-like is a high priority.

I guess if you don't mind tolerating violence towards our kids, and teachers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are tons of literature and data about Montgomery County SROs that say otherwise. And why would it be a bad thing to provide principals with resources who can actually help them? Why would you take that away? Aren't we supposed to support Principals so that they can effectively run their schools and provide a safe environment for students and staff?

There are studies about the effectiveness of SROs in Montgomery County? I haven't seen any, could you link to them please?

MoCo won't do that because the results would go against their progressive objectives.

The BOE attempted to study it, but Elrich moved forward with removing SROs before the study could be completed. The numbers don't like. There has been an uptick in violence.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2021/02/02/county-state-lawmakers-battle-over-school-resource-officers-intensifies/

So are there studies, or aren't there?

did you read the article?

They probably do but don't want to publicize it since it would go against the progressive agenda.

So, there are studies that show that SROs in Montgomery County are effective, but they are secret studies? Amazing. I learn something new on DCUM every day!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

You know what sounds a lot like prison? A place where people openly abuse substances and violence is tolerated and permitted.

Maybe it's not the parents who want better security and more stringent discipline in place who want to turn schools into "kid prison," but it's those who think that the current state is "just fine" or "not a big deal" that are interested in maintaining the kid prison dystopia.

I think a lot of the kids at RM, which has had 2 instances of guns on campus in as many weeks, would prefer SROs come back. Maybe kids at Magruder and Einstein too. A lot of the parents want them back too. Sadly MCPD is so understaffed due to recruitment problems that I’m not sure they can staff the program.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it a coincidence that there's been a rise in violence, drugs, and weapons at MCPS property since SROs were removed? Hmm.

It's about the same; there's just a rise in postings about these things to fearmonger and help bring back SROs.

Unless your head has been so far up your a$$ that you can't read the news, you are playing down the uptick in violence in our schools

No it’s just more publicized

As a way to fearmonger to achieve political ends like bringing back SROs or making public schools into kid prison

They hate public schools or any spending for the public good. The only spending they're down with is for the police and military to keep the poor in their place. More SROs is a win-win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There are tons of literature and data about Montgomery County SROs that say otherwise. And why would it be a bad thing to provide principals with resources who can actually help them? Why would you take that away? Aren't we supposed to support Principals so that they can effectively run their schools and provide a safe environment for students and staff?

There are studies about the effectiveness of SROs in Montgomery County? I haven't seen any, could you link to them please?

MoCo won't do that because the results would go against their progressive objectives.

The BOE attempted to study it, but Elrich moved forward with removing SROs before the study could be completed. The numbers don't like. There has been an uptick in violence.

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2021/02/02/county-state-lawmakers-battle-over-school-resource-officers-intensifies/

So are there studies, or aren't there?

did you read the article?

They probably do but don't want to publicize it since it would go against the progressive agenda.

So, there are studies that show that SROs in Montgomery County are effective, but they are secret studies? Amazing. I learn something new on DCUM every day!

Yes, dcum is great for getting the word out, especially with MCPS because they prefer to hide the issues.

If you read the MCPS forum there are no less than four or five incidents in the past month that lead to a lockdown and/or incident with weapons.