I'm guessing the voters who live in the Enclave have a better understanding of living in the Enclave, and of their own interests and priorities, than you do. |
Perhaps, but I am pretty confident saying I know more about our police department than they do. At least I’ve done several ride-alongs. Let’s not pretend for a second that the previous council improved safety in Montgomery County. You don’t have to look any further than the crime reports to see that. They also decimated MCPD, which used to be the most sought-out department by recruits. Now they can’t even fill a class because recruits can go to neighboring counties for better pay and more support. And listening to constituents? No, they didn’t do that, either. The council and exec listened to a task force of 3 students before removing SROs. 3, out of 160,000. Meanwhile, PGCPS actually sent out a community-wide survey. 80% of respondents said to keep them. I doubt there will be a ton of listening going on by the current council, but I would love to see them prove me wrong. So, are they prepared to handle crime? Not remotely. I’ll change my mind when I see one of them learn a little bit about policing instead of issuing self-serving statements. |
That's some chutzpah there. You've done several ride-alongs, so you know more about what's good for east county voters than the east county voters themselves and the people they just elected/re-elected. Wow. |
Um… why did you assume I don’t live in east county? I stand by my statements. I’ve watched the council for the past few years because I am very concerned about increasing crime. All I’ve seen are things that make me worry. The Reimagining Public Safety Task force? Recommendations to decrease police presence by 50% in Silver Spring and Wheaton? Stopping enforcement of quality of life crimes? A suggestion to remove guns from the officers? How does any of this come across as logical and reasoned? Look at the incidents in MCPS. It was Elrich and the past council who removed SROs against the desire of the school system. How do they know what’s better for students and staff than the educators and administrators? I live in reality. I want to feel safe in my community. So you call it “churzpah.” I call it holding these representatives accountable. |
Ok, so you live in the east county. Well, the majority of your voting neighbors disagree with you. That's democracy. |
You have yet to comment on crime itself: the increasing statistics, the task force recommendations, the lack of research before removing SROs, etc. Is it just “my candidate won,” or is it “let’s get to work”? I’m not seeing that you’re actually concerned about crime. I guess it hasn’t affected you as it has me. |
No. It's that east county voters JUST voted to elect progressives (of whom 4 of 5 are non-white, and 4 of 5 were actually RE-elected) to represent them in the Maryland General Assembly and the County Council, and your take on this is "a bunch of white progressives who think they are being allies, but who are in fact bringing more pain to marginalized communities in the form of increased crime". Terrible take. |
I am not that poster. I have made no statement about “a bunch of white progressives.” I have ONLY provided true facts about crime and the previous council’s affect on the county. Once again: will you only comment on the election, or do you have a comment about crime? |
You haven't provided any "true facts" about crime. You have only provided your personal opinions. |
Here you go! Read away: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/pol/Resources/Files/Annual-Reports/CrimeandSafety/2021%20MCPD%20Annual%20Report%20on%20Crime%20and%20Safety.pdf One note: when you see that “crimes against society” are down 37%, know that is because police are now discouraged from stopping people from using drugs or drinking in public, urinating / defecating, etc. It’s still happening, just isn’t reported. Therefore, my opinions are grounded in fact. As for other facts I have posted, would you care to comment on the way SROs were removed without community comment? That’s another fact. |
"SROs were removed without community comment" is the opposite of fact. |
Sure, if you consider a panel of 3 students sufficient for a population of 160,000 students and no community-wide survey. Meanwhile, Prince George’s handled it this way: https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/pgcps/Board.nsf/files/BXNW286FF2A9/$file/SRO%20Presentation%20v1%20PPT%20(1).pdf |
There was plenty of community comment. It's just that most of the comments were from community members with opinions you disagree with. |
Carjackings and murders are happening in Bethesda and Potomac that are getting “swept under the rug”? |
Where were these advertised? Was everybody given ample opportunity to comment? If the council and exec wanted to do this properly, they would have had a community-wide survey. Does it shock you that PGCPS’s survey shows 80% support for SROs? Is it so unreasonable to assume that a similar survey conducted here would show the same? Until this is done for MCPS, no… this was NOT a well-handled, community-informed decision. (Does it matter that the principals unanimously wanted to keep them? No. They were ignored.) Can you really support a 3-student panel? You’re okay with that? |