Virginia couple sued by Afghan refugees of crazy scheme to kidnap their baby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since the baby is a girl, I hope she gets to stay with the American couple. Her life will be crap otherwise.

This is pure WASP elitism and xenophobia.

-nonwhite person who taught Sunday school in a Protestant church

Evangelicals are not really WASPs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where does it say the lawyer Mast had never seen the baby in Afghanistan?

Why did he want this baby so much? He should've stepped aside 3 months after starting this when the Red Cross found the baby's family.

I agree, why was he like a dog without a bone about this child? That alone is concerning, and then there is the lying, perjury, kidnapping, etc. Are the marines looking into his behavior? What horrible people.

White savior complex, common among fundamentalist Christians who adopt children from abroad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

The Masts didn’t legitimately go through the court systems. They lied under oath, the forged documents, and went to a local county court that has zero jurisdiction over a child on the other side of the globe that isn’t American, never was in Virginia, isn’t related to anyone in Virginia, has no ties to Virginia. period. Even Angelina Jolie isn’t this brazen.

[Anonymous]

When done on a large scale, this is considered a form of genocide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where does it say the lawyer Mast had never seen the baby in Afghanistan?

Why did he want this baby so much? He should've stepped aside 3 months after starting this when the Red Cross found the baby's family.

I agree, why was he like a dog without a bone about this child? That alone is concerning, and then there is the lying, perjury, kidnapping, etc. Are the marines looking into his behavior? What horrible people.

White savior complex, common among fundamentalist Christians who adopt children from abroad.

It happens in the US too. This was a US court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When done on a large scale, this is considered a form of genocide.

When it's not done on a large scale, it's not genocide.

What was the point of your non-sequitur?

[Anonymous]

According to Twitter, the Masts have been traveling to evangelical churches over the last year giving talks about their “unexpected opportunity to stand up to protect innocent life” and to be a speaker about their “remarkable deliverance”.

They’ve gone on a speaking tour about what they’ve done.

They also already have FOUR children, all boys.

https://twitter.com/apstamm/status/1583614502633111553?s=46&t=M67d1KpSIw5osLr8AWKJCg

[Anonymous]

I hope that a court decision on the merits, or some temporary order placing the child with its original family, is issued soon. The longer she stays with the Masts, the more likely it will be deemed to be in her “best interest” to stay there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

they put the parents through extreme horrors. wtf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

If someone went through the court system and lied to kidnap your child, you'd be OK, because that's not bad like human trafficking? Or are you assuming that because the baby was adopted the parents didn't care that much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Since the baby is a girl, I hope she gets to stay with the American couple. Her life will be crap otherwise.

Moron. The Afghan family members are in the U.S. and will be citizens. You're disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

If someone went through the court system and lied to kidnap your child, you'd be OK, because that's not bad like human trafficking? Or are you assuming that because the baby was adopted the parents didn't care that much?

I read the cousin’s wife or the Afghan adopted mother was 8 months pregnant when the Masts took the child, and she fainted/collapsed on the floor on the spot when it happened. And in year since the Masts took the baby, the mother has attempted suicide several times. These people cared! They more than care. They love her. They’re her parents. F the Masts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope they get prosecuted for human trafficking.

This is not human trafficking. Using the wrong words just makes people ignore both issues.

That is exactly what it is. You can't pay to fly someone out on a pretense and steal the baby they are the guardian of. How would you like it if I met you in NYC and did the same?

If you really understood the horrors of human trafficking, you wouldn't be making these comparisons. Kidnapping maybe, but not human trafficking.

This is literally the definition of human trafficking. And it’s plenty horrific.

Do you have some narrower definition that only involved sexual exploitation? If so, educate yourself.

Yes, because going through the court system to obtain an orphaned infant is exactly the same as the horrors that many go through when part of a trafficking operations. You're being willfully ignorant. Must be nice to go through life that clueless....

If someone went through the court system and lied to kidnap your child, you'd be OK, because that's not bad like human trafficking? Or are you assuming that because the baby was adopted the parents didn't care that much?

What on earth are you talking about? This was fraud, illegal baby-knapping. Not human trafficking. Saying that something is not trafficking doesn't mean that it's okay.

[Anonymous]

Faces of pure evil pretending to be “Christian”