Not self-righteous. Just telling it like it is. |
Focusing on an arguably inconsequential detail of my larger point, shows you have nothing. |
Your larger point is just pontificating online about how awesome it is to be inbounds for the richest elementary in DC and attributing all the benefits of a high SES cohort to the moral fortitude of the parents. It's all nonsense that's been debunked a million times. It's not an argument, it's public masturbation. |
IF all it took to make a school successful was money then please explain why all the millions of dollars that are plowed into the underperforming schools every single year doesn't make a difference. Also, are you really arguing that parental involvement doesn't matter? |
This. DCPS has one of the highest expenditure per student in the country and terrible outcomes. You can throw all the money you want at the problem like DCPS. It starts in the home and in the family. Stability, emphasis on education, etc... Families might not even have the time to be involved at school and might not even be able to read to their kids (illiteracy, immigrant and ESL, etc..) but a stable family structure where parents prioritized education is the key. Those are the kids from the poor families that do well and know education is the way out. |
High SES cohort and per pupil expenditure are not the same thing. Weird that your focus on education didn't result in any understanding of the issues. |
Weird that you keep focusing on ridiculously trivial details. I'm fairly certain most heart surgeons and/or nuclear scientists do NOT understand what "SES cohort" means. Guess they are dumb too, huh? Seriously, why can't you just admit that PARENTING MATTERS? IS there something offensive about this statement? |
I agree. PP’s logic is also flawed because there are so many low SES kids with parental involvement that make it. The most obvious largest cohort are the Asian immigrants. Look at the strongest test in high schools in NY. Overwhelmingly low SES. |
Wow. Fwiw if kids had even a small chance of turning into this kind of racist monster, Janney sucks. Also I find Janney to be unimpressive but I guess I have high standards. |
Different poster. You’re equating good parenting with wealth and bad parenting with poverty and being black. So yeah, you sound racist af and offensive to anyone with shred of decency. Side note, maybe you want to get off your phone and teach your kids how to be decent human beings so they don’t turn into you? Better yet, hire someone else as you don’t seem to have any decency, human kindness, or tolerance. |
I'm not sure what metric you are using to make this statement? I don't think it's even true. I do agree that parental involvement counts, but there are other schools besides Janney where that is the case. |
Who has said that? There is a large group of people (and politicians) who are "pro" pubic schools and "against" public charters. Why the Biden administration is undermining the right now. Public charters absolutely stand for mobility and choice. |
| Sorry, public schools LOL. |
Sorry but that is YOUR equation. As I mentioned, my single, immigrant mom, working two jobs with zero support, raised us to value education, over all else. We lived in poverty growing up. It is not about money -- unless you are grasping for ways to defend bad parenting (i.e. parents who live in poverty are "too preoccupied" with the dysfunction around them to buy their kids books and provide incentives for finishing homework.) In any event, your approach isn't doing anyone any favors.. You can keep insulting people who speak the truth but it won't change the truth. Keep on throwing money at the problem and all that means is your tax dollars are being wasted. |
How do you see this as a racial issue? Just curious. |