If kids had buses, there would be a lot less traffic in the city. |
NP but I judge her. She already has access to good schools. Now she is creating traffic and taking a charter spot from a kid who doesn’t have as many options for good IB schools. |
| But you don’t reprimand her for not “supporting the community”. |
I judge you for your response. By your definition the only people who should ethically go to charter schools are those who live nearby. But aren’t charter schools designed to be different? What if you’re a bilingual family and you want to keep that part of your culture. Why isn’t it okay for people further afield to take advantage of charter spots? |
Yeah, I love the idea that ultimately charters are neighborhood schools and should only be used by people nearby.
|
You judge people from “good” areas for taking a spot for less advantaged students. You judge people from “bad” areas for “not supporting their community” and “hurting their local schools”. Seems like a reasonable accusation. I believe many middle class families in dc feel that way. |
The best elementary school in DC is Janney, in Ward 3. Ever given any thought as to why? Parental involvement. Parental involvement with the school, with DCPS, with their community AND WITH THEIR CHILDREN. Doesn't matter who you are, parental involvement - on multiple levels - is required for a school to be successful. You need a sizeable group of parents prioritizing education in their family and their community in order to make a school successful. Janney hasn't always been high performing and it hasn't always been crowded. Same with Deal and Wilson, which, not surprisingly, are the middle and high schools for Janney kids. Again, none of those 3 schools would be worth a damn without the parents involved in that school. That's what the PP is talking about. And, frankly, any parent in Ward 3 would understand exactly what PP was getting at with her comment. Parents investing in their neighborhood schools, community and their kids is the (not so) secret sauce. Not sure what racial prejudice has to do with anything and, in particular, why it would prevent you from reading to your children from the day they are born, filling your house with books, never buying them an electronic device, and taking them to the library and free Smithsonian museums whenever you have time to spend together. |
I don't reprimand anyone who supports charters as an option for all from attending charters..if you support public schools for all and charters, private or vouchers for only some, then I would reprimand you. |
No, the reason is because the parents are wealthy and can therefore solve nearly all of their parenting or family problems with money. |
are you saying that it is good parenting to "never buy your child an electronic device"? do you live in 1994? |
Not the PP and I fully agree that life is usually better with money's and even better with more money. But people without money can also solve problems (geeze, been there!) And not all parenting is solving problems |
PP here. Having money has nothing to do with being a good parent. My single mom, who worked two jobs to support me and my two brothers, was an amazing parent. She showered us with affection and made it clear that education was a priority (even though she herself never went to college). On the flip side, there are some wealthy people here who are bad parents and I feel very sorry for their kids. They will be the spoiled brats with drug problems who can never hold down a job. |
Ah yes, it's true that no kids from Janney, Deal or Wilson have electronics. Good imaginary parenting guidelines, self-righteous lady! |
PP here. Yes, I am. Electronic devices exist so parents can ignore their children. |
Does that include the electronic device you're using to try to condescend to the world at large on DCUM? Because your kids could use a lesson plan for tomorrow. Why are you ignoring them? Do you want to get kicked out of Janney? |