Did Condi Rice & Bush II have a fling?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who make baseless speculations like this hurt women everywhere.

+1. The fact that they made jokes like work husband etc. suggests to me that they had a good working relationship. It’s some serious mike pence level sh-t to suggest that men and women can’t be close colleagues without sex coming into play.

Yes to this. Full throated misogyny to make baseless accusations about work affairs. That the party “of women” lol engages in this BS is not surprising especially if said woman has an (R) after her name.

+100
Always. Republican women are fair game, in the eyes of the left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who make baseless speculations like this hurt women everywhere.

+1. The fact that they made jokes like work husband etc. suggests to me that they had a good working relationship. It’s some serious mike pence level sh-t to suggest that men and women can’t be close colleagues without sex coming into play.

Yes to this. Full throated misogyny to make baseless accusations about work affairs. That the party “of women” lol engages in this BS is not surprising especially if said woman has an (R) after her name.

+100
Always. Republican women are fair game, in the eyes of the left.

+4(00)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love her. Love him too. And Laura is great. All good people

+1

+2

+3

And current situation admins (Trump and Biden) just keep making them look better and better

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love her. Love him too. And Laura is great. All good people

War criminals

Loon ^^

No. NP here and history shows that they are war criminals.

Bush Junior was responsible for the killing of at least a hundred thousand civilians, many of them women and children, and ensured that their country would be lawless and that survivors would be subject to predation by criminals.

I despise him for what he did. He did not follow the doctrine of proportional response that is the backbone of western democratic ideals.

Everyone in his administration who approved of his aggression is tainted.

He IS the unqualified President. This is what lack of qualification does. People DIE. Not just American soldiers, but innocents who never signed up for anything.

Trump is unqualified in other ways. He is against sending American troops to fight abroad, but he endangered the security of the US by showing classified information to others and subsequently, our agents were terminated and Russia was persuaded it could take Ukraine without retribution, thus destabilizing the world for years to come. It's another form of harm that he brought to this country and its loyal Allies.

I hope going forward that more people understand that no matter the political background, you do not vote for a stupid or inexperienced, or otherwise unreasonable candidate.

[Anonymous]

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/404198135279422605/

He leered at her from behind, quite telling.

[Anonymous]

So many absolutely delusional nuts on this thread. Or maybe it’s just one particularly unhinged individual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.pinterest.com/pin/404198135279422605/

He leered at her from behind, quite telling.

According to a Psychology Today article, the leer has to have at least 73% pupil enlargement on the Eisley scale for this to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So many absolutely delusional nuts on this thread. Or maybe it’s just one particularly unhinged individual.

I think it’s one maga nut. They have nothing but time on their hands and weird hate in their heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.pinterest.com/pin/404198135279422605/

He leered at her from behind, quite telling.

According to a Psychology Today article, the leer has to have at least 73% pupil enlargement on the Eisley scale for this to be true.

Come one a leer is a leer. Did you notice everyone else was looking at the different direction except Bush.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many absolutely delusional nuts on this thread. Or maybe it’s just one particularly unhinged individual.

I think it’s one maga nut. They have nothing but time on their hands and weird hate in their heart.

Major wishful thinking on your part. You know as well as I do that the nutter on this thread is most definitely a LWNJ. But great gaslighting!

[Anonymous]

No one reports on WH affairs because everyone in that workaholic environment are sleeping with each other. Media would be locked out of any future reporting just from all the marriages and relationships they put at odds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one reports on WH affairs because everyone in that workaholic environment are sleeping with each other. Media would be locked out of any future reporting just from all the marriages and relationships they put at odds.

Yeah absolutely! No one was interested in Bill Clinton’s personal life.

[Anonymous]

Only democrats are held to high moral standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Ha. I remember that people called her his nanny.

More likely than they had a fling. Indeed, all joking aside, it tends to happen with Presidents, due to their heavy schedule and the immensity of the task apportioned to them. There are all kinds of gatekeepers around them, people who act as sounding boards, and a couple of really trustworthy aides who have the ear of President.

Don’t be simpleminded naive. Have you ever seen a highly intelligent person being a nanny to someone half his/her IQ? If anything, he was manipulated by her just like he was by Cheney .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No one reports on WH affairs because everyone in that workaholic environment are sleeping with each other. Media would be locked out of any future reporting just from all the marriages and relationships they put at odds.

I doubt anyone is sleeping with Joe.