This is all lies. 1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this. 2. You likely didn't watch Will Smith movies anyway so you claiming you won't watch them now is silly. 3. Why are you bringing him up ? Not relevant. |
| I probably wouldn't care. |
| I would ban her for 10 years. |
|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10722537/Carl-Lentzs-wife-punched-babysitter-face-three-times-leaked-report-says.html
It is obviously the years old story? Not sure why she posted it. The DH here is obviously a player and it came crashing down on him. Babysitter sounds innocent. Wife perpetually lied to. |
| I don't see any problems here. |
+1000000 |
Is it any surprise the wife is as big of a trashbag as the husband? |
| This is like the most overly specific thread ever |
Well instead of trolling with a false scenario, OP should have just posted the most recent article and asked people what they thought. |
I had thought about bringing him up as well, but left it alone. But given this, the reason being how can we condemn Will Smith for slapping Chris Rock (I do) and not apply the same sense of judgment on a woman who punches the babysitter? We have to condemn both acts. |
Nowhere does the law agree with "violence is at times the answer." There are narrow circumstances where there are affirmative defenses that can be raised when one has acted violently, but at no time does the law say that such action is necessary or the answer. |
| Punch hit and hurt and destrly@! Very bad person that you saY!! |
|
I would punch the husband.
When I found out my husband had an affair I beat the crap out of him. He wouldn’t leave and I kept telling him to because my anger:emotions were so high. I would have loved to beat her too, but I didn’t want to go to jail. |
I’d keep my college age daughters and babysitters away from the husband. I certainly wouldn’t let them babysit for him. |
Simply because something is legal doesn't mean it is right. |