If a mom friend of yours punched her babysitter who sh’s thought was having an affair with her DH

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Violence is never an answer. I'd never watch any Will Smith movie again.


This is all lies.

1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this.

2. You likely didn't watch Will Smith movies anyway so you claiming you won't watch them now is silly.

3. Why are you bringing him up ? Not relevant.
Anonymous
I probably wouldn't care.
Anonymous
I would ban her for 10 years.
Anonymous
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10722537/Carl-Lentzs-wife-punched-babysitter-face-three-times-leaked-report-says.html

It is obviously the years old story? Not sure why she posted it. The DH here is obviously a player and it came crashing down on him. Babysitter sounds innocent. Wife perpetually lied to.
Anonymous
I don't see any problems here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violence is never an answer. I'd never watch any Will Smith movie again.


This is all lies.

1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this.

2. You likely didn't watch Will Smith movies anyway so you claiming you won't watch them now is silly.

3. Why are you bringing him up ? Not relevant.


+1000000
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10722537/Carl-Lentzs-wife-punched-babysitter-face-three-times-leaked-report-says.html

It is obviously the years old story? Not sure why she posted it. The DH here is obviously a player and it came crashing down on him. Babysitter sounds innocent. Wife perpetually lied to.
Is it any surprise the wife is as big of a trashbag as the husband?
Anonymous
This is like the most overly specific thread ever
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is like the most overly specific thread ever
Well instead of trolling with a false scenario, OP should have just posted the most recent article and asked people what they thought.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violence is never an answer. I'd never watch any Will Smith movie again.


This is all lies.

NP:

1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this.

In self defense. The mom was acting out her anger on another person. She was not at risk of being physically harmed.


3. Why are you bringing him (Will Smith) up ? Not relevant.


I had thought about bringing him up as well, but left it alone. But given this, the reason being how can we condemn Will Smith for slapping Chris Rock (I do) and not apply the same sense of judgment on a woman who punches the babysitter? We have to condemn both acts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violence is never an answer. I'd never watch any Will Smith movie again.


This is all lies.

1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this.

2. You likely didn't watch Will Smith movies anyway so you claiming you won't watch them now is silly.

3. Why are you bringing him up ? Not relevant.


Nowhere does the law agree with "violence is at times the answer." There are narrow circumstances where there are affirmative defenses that can be raised when one has acted violently, but at no time does the law say that such action is necessary or the answer.
Anonymous
Punch hit and hurt and destrly@! Very bad person that you saY!!
Anonymous
I would punch the husband.

When I found out my husband had an affair I beat the crap out of him.

He wouldn’t leave and I kept telling him to because my anger:emotions were so high.

I would have loved to beat her too, but I didn’t want to go to jail.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’d call the police. Violence has no place in a civilized society. I would also make sure that everyone in our circle is warned of her and her brutality so they and their children can steer clear.


I’d keep my college age daughters and babysitters away from the husband. I certainly wouldn’t let them babysit for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Violence is never an answer. I'd never watch any Will Smith movie again.


This is all lies.

1. Violence is at times the answer, the law actually agrees with this.


Simply because something is legal doesn't mean it is right.

post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: