Melania Trump modeling career

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d read the heck out of an expose of Melania and her rags to riches pack of lies.

+1000. Juicy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

No, bless yours! I'm sorry that you cannot move on from this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

No, bless yours! I'm sorry that you cannot move on from this thread.

LOL right? "Move on" PP, you are super weirdly fussy about this. Sorry, we're going to keep mocking your heroine and you can't stop us.

[Anonymous]

She had been laying awfully low lately. Let’s speculate on how much negotiation would take place before she’d go back to the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She had been laying awfully low lately. Let’s speculate on how much negotiation would take place before she’d go back to the White House.

Please don't even speak those words

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

No, bless yours! I'm sorry that you cannot move on from this thread.

LOL right? "Move on" PP, you are super weirdly fussy about this. Sorry, we're going to keep mocking your heroine and you can't stop us.

Funny, neither can you stop Melania with your super weirdly fussy posts. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

Hello Melania

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.

The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.

Who cares?

Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.

Not unlike yourself.

Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.

DP

Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!

We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?

Again, move on.

No thank you! Again: it's not up to you.

I’m sorry you cannot move on. Bless your heart.

Hello Melania

Hello

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She had been laying awfully low lately. Let’s speculate on how much negotiation would take place before she’d go back to the White House.

The embarrassment of not successfully selling her crap must have been a shock. Was she in such a bubble that she didn't realize how much people hate them?

[Anonymous]

I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had been laying awfully low lately. Let’s speculate on how much negotiation would take place before she’d go back to the White House.

The embarrassment of not successfully selling her crap must have been a shock. Was she in such a bubble that she didn't realize how much people hate them?

It was all some kind of tax dodge - I'm not sure she even needed anyone to buy the stuff. I really don't think she cares what anyone thinks. That's part of why she's so beguiling (and loathsome).

[Anonymous]

I read she was on the cover of Italian Bogie and Bulgaria’s Harpers Bazaar. And that she worked with two well known photographers.