Sophie Turner pregnant again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Definitely pregnant. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10513095/Sophie-Turner-sparks-pregnancy-rumors-Joe-Jonas-daughter.html

Yes, definitely. I wonder how far along. She seems like one of those people that doesn't show until she's like 6 or 7 months - even with the second.

[Anonymous]

Good for her. I mean, if I had had millions in the bank and a husband in my early 20s, and no soul-sucking desk job, I might have been persuaded to just pop out a few kids. Why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. I mean, if I had had millions in the bank and a husband in my early 20s, and no soul-sucking desk job, I might have been persuaded to just pop out a few kids. Why not?

Because it's trashy to have kids so young.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. I mean, if I had had millions in the bank and a husband in my early 20s, and no soul-sucking desk job, I might have been persuaded to just pop out a few kids. Why not?

Because it's trashy to have kids so young.

It’s only trashy when you can’t afford them and you’re posting on DCUM weekly that your in-laws won’t provide free childcare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like it from the side view. I'm jealous of the young moms too. I wish I'd found my spouse earlier in life!

+1

I don’t think I was ready when was her age but wish I’d had my first in my late 20s. I also didn’t have a bunch of money in the bank and was living with several other twenty-somethings so maybe it’s better for my children that I didn’t!

Its helpful when you and your spouses are millionaires who can afford to not work for the early years or only as you choose plus all the help you want, fly out grandparents for months.

People thought I was crazy for working my tail off for (a fraction) of the millions she had from 24 - 36. But by the time I had my first kid at 37...spouse and I both quit our jobs for a full year (well, he consulted occasionally) and I don't do anything now but focus on family + home with the rest of my money in trust in case I need it later in life.

Yeah that’s nice for you but even after working for over a decade few people are in a position to have both partners take a year off to be home with a kid. That’s a rare situation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks amazing. He looks like a dumpy nerd. He needs to burn those pants.

+1

He's such a short dork, and not in a good way. Dude is batting way out of his league, but money + fame allow you to snag gorgeous women.

Funny, because I don't think she is even attractive, let alone amazing. But Joe doesn't look very happy in most of their recent pics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And this is Naomi with her baby girl at 51.

Surrogate?

[Anonymous]

I’m not sure why she’s a big deal. Is she a model? I don’t find her that attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is Naomi with her baby girl at 51.

Surrogate?

It doesn't seem like it. Dailymail posted pictures of her bump.

[Anonymous]

She is pregnant!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. I mean, if I had had millions in the bank and a husband in my early 20s, and no soul-sucking desk job, I might have been persuaded to just pop out a few kids. Why not?

Because it's trashy to have kids so young.

She'll be free of childraising in her forties while the rest of us that age are knee deep in PTA meetings and then collge apps.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Definitely pregnant. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10513095/Sophie-Turner-sparks-pregnancy-rumors-Joe-Jonas-daughter.html

Yes, definitely. I wonder how far along. She seems like one of those people that doesn't show until she's like 6 or 7 months - even with the second.

She's pretty tall, so that influences how early she'd show. I'm not even that tall (5'8), but thanks to my long torso I didn't show until 30 weeks with my first and 26 weeks with my second.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And this is Naomi with her baby girl at 51.

Surrogate?

Definitely. ANd a weird picture, it somehow doesn't even look like her.

[Anonymous]

It looks like Naomi Campbell had a face lift and/or rhinoplasty. Her face definitely looks different now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good for her. I mean, if I had had millions in the bank and a husband in my early 20s, and no soul-sucking desk job, I might have been persuaded to just pop out a few kids. Why not?

Because it's trashy to have kids so young.

Why??you are jealous