Sophie Turner pregnant again?

[Anonymous]

The close up of her sitting on the stairs…wow. She is a stunning woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe she's throwing her life away to have kids in her early and mid 20s. Doesn't she know she can squander away another 10 or 15 years away partying, on the pill, traveling, and getting sloshed at brunches without a care in the world?

Oh look, brunch granny found us. Man, you are boring. Even your attempts at snark are boring. Do you have friends?

She’s a Hollywood actress. She does have a decade of partying, traveling, and getting sloshed at brunches behind her - hers just started way younger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think she’s pregnant. I was built like her and after one kid my core was destroyed and my stomach looked a little pregnant every day, more so if I had any good in my stomach.

I thought the same but this was her a few months ago:


I mean good for her if she's just eating well! But the rest of her body is still tiny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think she’s pregnant. I was built like her and after one kid my core was destroyed and my stomach looked a little pregnant every day, more so if I had any good in my stomach.

I thought the same but this was her a few months ago:


I mean good for her if she's just eating well! But the rest of her body is still tiny.

Yeah, I think she is expecting and just didn’t announce yet because of Nick and Priyanka’s announcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think she’s pregnant. I was built like her and after one kid my core was destroyed and my stomach looked a little pregnant every day, more so if I had any good in my stomach.

I thought the same but this was her a few months ago:


I mean good for her if she's just eating well! But the rest of her body is still tiny.

Yeah, I think she is expecting and just didn’t announce yet because of Nick and Priyanka’s announcement.

I like her and her husband as a couple. They've been lowkey about all their major moments from the start. They eloped in Las Vegas and only under pressure from family did they they have a 'real' wedding months later...even though they could obviously afford a huge ceremony from the start. Then for their first child, no big splash or pregnancy announcement on wedding covers. Again it was organic. No crazy maternity shoots bordering on pornographic ala Demi Moore. They didn't release official photos of the child, just casually appeared with her going about their day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

You keep forgetting that she's rich, rich, rich. If I were that rich at 25, I'd have been having babies, too, but no, I was paying my way through grad school. I suspect you already know you're a loser so I won't tell you again.

DCUM harpies claim rich coastal elites wait until 33 to 39 for a first child. Only low class rubes in flyover country have babies in their early and mid 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

You keep forgetting that she's rich, rich, rich. If I were that rich at 25, I'd have been having babies, too, but no, I was paying my way through grad school. I suspect you already know you're a loser so I won't tell you again.

DCUM harpies claim rich coastal elites wait until 33 to 39 for a first child. Only low class rubes in flyover country have babies in their early and mid 20s.

Well she's British so she can be excluded from this narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why can't that just be her belly, OP?

It can be and no issue if it is - she looks amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

Yes, dcum is totally against this. You must be 40 to have your first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

Yes, dcum is totally against this. You must be 40 to have your first.

Ugh - what is the point of your commentary exactly? Are you just trolling for kicks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

You keep forgetting that she's rich, rich, rich. If I were that rich at 25, I'd have been having babies, too, but no, I was paying my way through grad school. I suspect you already know you're a loser so I won't tell you again.

DCUM harpies claim rich coastal elites wait until 33 to 39 for a first child. Only low class rubes in flyover country have babies in their early and mid 20s.

It's true there are women who care about professional accomplishments, and work very hard to have both in the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

Yes, dcum is totally against this. You must be 40 to have your first.

Ugh - what is the point of your commentary exactly? Are you just trolling for kicks?

Who's trolling? That is the posture of many obnoxious posters here: it's trashy to have kids in your 20s and classy and sophisticated to have ivf babies in your mid and late 30s after 10 or 15 years of "fun" and "playing the field" and getting a few promotions in your paper shuffling / zoom meeting "career". Everyone knows kids in your 20s torpedoes your career, period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's only 25. Wow just wow. According to the harpies on dcum, it is totally white trash and backwards to have two beautiful healthy babies by your mid 20s.

Yes, dcum is totally against this. You must be 40 to have your first.

Ugh - what is the point of your commentary exactly? Are you just trolling for kicks?

Who's trolling? That is the posture of many obnoxious posters here: it's trashy to have kids in your 20s and classy and sophisticated to have ivf babies in your mid and late 30s after 10 or 15 years of "fun" and "playing the field" and getting a few promotions in your paper shuffling / zoom meeting "career". Everyone knows kids in your 20s torpedoes your career, period.

Pp, it’s just the resident brunch granny, she’s having a mental health crisis related to women daring to have kids in their 30s and 40s and not even being ashamed of it. Perhaps it’s a perimenopausal thing, I don’t know.?

[Anonymous]

And this is Naomi with her baby girl at 51.

[Anonymous]

Definitely pregnant. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10513095/Sophie-Turner-sparks-pregnancy-rumors-Joe-Jonas-daughter.html