You must be joking. Have you even read the OP? How about the dozens and dozens of other doomsday threads started by liberals who actually seem to enjoy fear-mongering? JFC. NP |
I laughed when I saw that post. Fear-mongering is a right wing thing... right. There's plenty of fear-mongering to go around. |
Intriguing post. What is this rise of an unabashedly un-Christian brand of Christianity? Do you know anything about the history of Christianity? The happy clappy Episcopalian church with BLM signs and rainbow flags is not what most Christian churches were till oh, about 25 years ago. So you know Christianity more intimately and "better" than nearly 2,000 years of Christian followers? We're obviously not talking about the Christianity of the great Crusades or the centuries long clashes between Catholics and Protestants and the systematic discrimination against the "wrong" Christian faith in most places by the Christian majority. Even most Episcopalians of 1922 would be horrified if they could see the modern Episcopalian church. Where is this slide to fascism? I'm looking around. I see unhappy and authoritarian people on both the left and right. And many more authoritarians on the left. Who was it that forced through mandates and shutdowns and suspending civil liberties? Definitely not the right. Anyway, fascism? Do you even know what fascism is? I suspect not. Your post speaks to your fears more than it does to both history or the current political situation. You probably believe everything said on CNN without realizing they are driven by ratings and feed off the paranoia of their watchers to make money. |
DP. ![]() |
And yet... every.single.thread about fear-mongering is started by a LWNJ. How do you explain that? |
PP here - sorry, I see what you're saying! |
Bravo. Well said. |
The intriguing thing about the Nordic model is that it was based on a highly homogenous society with a strong shared cultural tradition and self-restraint by individuals to prevent abuse of the social welfare system. That model has been substantially weakened in recent decades and social problems have emerged, so we'll see what the future brings. I pity the word liberal. It no longer means what it did at one time. The classic 19th century enlightened liberal is not the progressive of today. And there is a distinct difference between progressivity and liberalism. So who are the liberals? Ironically, one can make a genuine claim that the modern conservatives are closer to the traditional liberals of the 19th century with their skepticism of political power, commitment to free press and speech, and stratified social classes while the modern liberals may have more in common with the 19th century strains of entrenched conservatives with emphasis on deference to people of authority and unquestioning acceptance of privileged social classes (which would be the modern professional classes of experts along with the blatant contempt of working classes and their views, as we see on DCUM and CNN and NYT daily with their continuous sneering references to Trumpsters and so forth), and open acceptance of censorship of heretical views in the name of the greater good (as we saw with COVID). The two positions have neatly flipped. I do think liberalism is heading for a mighty explosion. A new kind of left is emerging, which is distinctly not liberal for it does not prize natural rights concepts like freedom of speech or thought over the social good, and is much more open to greater and more intrusive state control to promote the greater good (whatever it may be). Many of the old liberals are still in denial of this growing authoritarian new left but others are not (Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald, the former liberals of Substack, and, of course, many voters). It'll be interesting to see what happens as it plays out in the next few elections. |
You realize you're describing the Republican party, right? |
You've already said that 57 times. Yet there is thread after thread after thread of RWNJs spewing their side's idiotic fearmongering. You not acknowledging that makes everyone here question your lucidity. For the record, repeating something over and over does not actually make it true. |