Nope, your kid is not entitled to a spot to any private or OOS school. The admission office thinks that your kid is not a good fit and an athlete is - simple as that. Public schools, sure; they should admit based on academics, if you paid taxes in that state. |
Life isn't fair. The sooner people realize this the happier they will be. Congrats to the kid who got in early. |
Yes, and four of them had kids at my school. |
Just athletic or anything else? What if your friend's kid played the violin and was getting a recruited? Or a math genius? Why are you caring about other people's kids? |
I agree you have to let things go but violinists and math geniuses don't get recruited. Please. |
I do know 2 people who were recruited for their instrument. One had to change instruments and show they could play at the highest level in a year. IMO winners generally go to MIT and it is considered a hook. |
| I think what you mean is I’m jealous that my friends daughter perform some thing at the top .1% of the nation and my daughter doesn’t. |
My child is a senior and is a recruited athlete for an Ivy. The likely letter from Admissions was received the first week of October. For Ivies in particular, there are no scholarships for merit or athletics so there's no advantage there. I can assure you that the process is not any less stressful for recruited athletes than everyone else. In fact, the grades (through the end of sophomore year), SAT scores, and athletic record had to be solidified earlier to receive a verbal commitment at the beginning of junior year, which is technically the earliest for such commitments based on NCAA rules. To be clear, the verbal commitment and coach's support in the admissions process came after a preliminary pre-read by Admissions. My child's full application (essays, recommendation letters, school profile, transcripts, official SAT scores) had to be submitted between September 1-15 of senior year which meant an abbreviated timeline. My child worked all summer on essays to meet this deadline. The fact that essays about your sport are discouraged meant that there had to be other substance there -- other meaningful extracurriculars, experiences, community service -- not just athletics. The admissions criteria for my athlete were the same as for any other student. There was no flexibility with the GPA or SAT score or expectations for being a well-rounded student. We are not an affluent family by any stretch of the imagination. Definitely working class. My family has made tremendous sacrifices (time and money) to provide the sport as an opportunity for my child. My child has dedicated 25-30 hours a week for years to reach the top of the sport while maintaining exceptional academics. The work has been put in and the admission is well-deserved. |
+100. All these posters sound jealous. Being top % in a sport (or at anything) is hard ass work |
| What a bunch of sanctimonious posers on this thread. I am with you OP. It’s called human nature. |
Translation: Colleges should only pay attention, for admissions purposes, to things *my* kid is good at. If they prioritize anything else, it's "ridiculous." Sounds like sour grapes, PP. Be better. |
| There are significantly more academic scholarships provided than athletic ones. Way more. And, that young lady has to apply and get in with all the same requirements as your kid. |
+1 |
OP, just to let you know, because part of your focus seems to be on the money this family has.... I come from an area where lacrosse is very popular. The town I live in is not fancy AT ALL. It's very common for kids here to go to colleges to play lacrosse. Probably not D1, but even so, to play at the collegiate level takes a lot of dedication, practice, hard work, and sometimes money.... but this is far from just wealthy families. Maybe that's true where you are. But in plenty of places, blue collar or LMC families work hard to make their kid an athletic success, too. Also to the PP saying how is this possible... there are 13 year olds signing letters of intent for athletics... |
Is all your motivation financial? |