| And my senior DD is in the midst of application hell and stress. Athletic recruitment really pisses me off. That’s all. |
| Guess you should have started your kid in lacrosse when he/she was 3 like they your friend did? |
| I agree, op. |
| Disagree. If your friend’s DD is academically qualified and someone who would be a good applicant at that school anyway, the school and student are making a good decision to lock in the relationship. Playing a sport at a level high enough to commit while maintaining grades, etc. deserves to be rewarded just as much as the kid who fiends 20 hours a week in the lab or practicing an instrument. Sports also enhance a school’s community and school spirit, so benefit all students. |
| Wow? Some friend you are. |
| Get over it. |
| Dude, being a top athlete is hard work. Good for her. Congratulate them instead of begrudging their dedication |
I think some of people's frustration with the process is that athletes are rewarded more than scientists and musicians. (Know any juniors who are biochemists or pianists who have been recruited?) |
| How is that even possible? |
|
I teach my kids to be happy for their friends, and to not waste their time with jealousy.
Want something? Work for it. And then there are types like you… |
+1 |
| College is supposed to be an academic pursuit. The role that sports plays is ridiculous. |
+1 |
| When you look at the big picture, is your kid actually working harder than the kid who spent years working for an athletic recruitment? |
Not necessarily true. It depends what sport and what type of music. Plus, the public has decided what’s more valuable to them. If schools make money on sports , they have to go after it. Maybe OPs kid should put the same discipline and focus in her strengths, hours of practice and conditioning, sacrifice personal and family time, train/work over holidays and breaks, and then maybe she’ll be just as good in her area of focus as her athlete friend? |