Why are book banners showing up at FCPS SB meetings

[Anonymous]

Because the books are pornographic crap?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

Neither should explicit books, whether between two boys or a boy and girl. Or man and woman, or two men or two women, etc.

Huh? You want to ban ALL books with any explicit sexual content?

Nutter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kids this age cannot give consent. It is not ok and it needs to go. I do Scouts and this is an issue--child on child abuse is 1/3 of all abuse. It needs to be treated with such care. I just cannot believe FCPS cannot see that some things need to go.

That does sound like abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

DP no, not all sexual content, just pornographic content. How is it that To Kill a Mockingbird is not read anymore because it’s offensive but dildos and 4th grade sex are fine?

Neither should explicit books, whether between two boys or a boy and girl. Or man and woman, or two men or two women, etc.

Huh? You want to ban ALL books with any explicit sexual content?

Nutter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That book sounds quite disgusting, but is it any worse than Flowers in the Attic which many people read in HS or younger? (I genuinely don’t know, I haven’t read either book)

Flowers for Algernon was not pornographic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That book sounds quite disgusting, but is it any worse than Flowers in the Attic which many people read in HS or younger? (I genuinely don’t know, I haven’t read either book)

Flowers for Algernon was not pornographic.

Hee! I don't know if it was intentional or not, but thanks for the laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

Neither should explicit books, whether between two boys or a boy and girl. Or man and woman, or two men or two women, etc.

Huh? You want to ban ALL books with any explicit sexual content?

Nutter.

DP but no, I don’t want to ban all books With sexual content, just the pornographic ones. How is it that To Kill a Mockimgbird is not read anymore because it’s offensive, but this tripe with strap-on dildos and fourth graders having sex is fine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kids this age cannot give consent. It is not ok and it needs to go. I do Scouts and this is an issue--child on child abuse is 1/3 of all abuse. It needs to be treated with such care. I just cannot believe FCPS cannot see that some things need to go.

That does sound like abuse.

First you are jerk. Second, the scouts had a problem but now has very rigorous training and rules. And we are trained to be careful about adults with children and children with children. The latter was not something I was very aware of until my scout training. And this is actually not a funny issue despite your effort to make light of it.

[Anonymous]

Isn't the movie rating limit for fcps high schools PG and under?

If you cannot show PG13 or R movies depcting graphic sex in fcps high schools, it stands to reason that pornographic books depicting child rape and molestation as a casual rite of passage should also be disallowed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the movie rating limit for fcps high schools PG and under?

If you cannot show PG13 or R movies depcting graphic sex in fcps high schools, it stands to reason that pornographic books depicting child rape and molestation as a casual rite of passage should also be disallowed.

Which book depicts “child rape and molestation”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

Neither should explicit books, whether between two boys or a boy and girl. Or man and woman, or two men or two women, etc.

Huh? You want to ban ALL books with any explicit sexual content?

Nutter.

DP but no, I don’t want to ban all books With sexual content, just the pornographic ones. How is it that To Kill a Mockimgbird is not read anymore because it’s offensive, but this tripe with strap-on dildos and fourth graders having sex is fine?

What exactly is “pornographic” vs “explicit sexual content”?

Newsflash - kids have sex. Some start exploring sexuality when they are young. Many masturbate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the movie rating limit for fcps high schools PG and under?

If you cannot show PG13 or R movies depcting graphic sex in fcps high schools, it stands to reason that pornographic books depicting child rape and molestation as a casual rite of passage should also be disallowed.

Which book depicts “child rape and molestation”?

This book. Lawn Boy. You idiot contrarian. Being contrary is not a good debating position. It’s just juvenile and obnoxious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kids this age cannot give consent. It is not ok and it needs to go. I do Scouts and this is an issue--child on child abuse is 1/3 of all abuse. It needs to be treated with such care. I just cannot believe FCPS cannot see that some things need to go.

That does sound like abuse.

First you are jerk. Second, the scouts had a problem but now has very rigorous training and rules. And we are trained to be careful about adults with children and children with children. The latter was not something I was very aware of until my scout training. And this is actually not a funny issue despite your effort to make light of it.

Sorry. I can’t take anyone seriously who thinks kids experimenting with their bodies is “abuse”.

What’s next? You punish them for masterbating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the movie rating limit for fcps high schools PG and under?

If you cannot show PG13 or R movies depcting graphic sex in fcps high schools, it stands to reason that pornographic books depicting child rape and molestation as a casual rite of passage should also be disallowed.

Which book depicts “child rape and molestation”?

This book. Lawn Boy. You idiot contrarian. Being contrary is not a good debating position. It’s just juvenile and obnoxious.

Liar.

That book does not depict “child rape and molestation”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't the movie rating limit for fcps high schools PG and under?

If you cannot show PG13 or R movies depcting graphic sex in fcps high schools, it stands to reason that pornographic books depicting child rape and molestation as a casual rite of passage should also be disallowed.

Which book depicts “child rape and molestation”?

This book. Lawn Boy. You idiot contrarian. Being contrary is not a good debating position. It’s just juvenile and obnoxious.

Liar.

That book does not depict “child rape and molestation”.

Wtf?

An adult molesting a 10 year old child is rape.

Period