Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is no way she can go anywhere without being photographed. She doesn’t need to tip anyone off. The entirety of the Australian press has been following her every move, and his. I understand other celebrities do this, but that’s to get famous or increase fame or rehab their image, etc. She needs none of that.
She might not need it but she does it. I mean she did it a lot when she was still building up her career too. But she still does it, and more frequently than other celebs. That's why you so often see stories about who she went to dinner with, where, plus high quality paparazzi photos that feature her full outfit. These are photo ops her team arranged to project a certain image and keep her in the news cycle. She will even ramp it up to promote an album or tour. This is why many of us sense there is at least a large element of the Kelce relationship that is PR based. It was just too perfect-- an opportunity to be on national TV on a weekly basis between the end of her US tour and the start of her internation tour, leading very nearly up to the Grammy's and the very carefully timed announcement of the new album?
Also, yes she can avoid being photographed. She gets followed but it's not Princess Diana level hounding. She's also got a full security team, a fleet of vehicles, and enough money to get her into lots of rich person places where she could enjoy privacy, especially for a date. Restaurants that will shut down or have private dining rooms, resorts and hotels that cater to private celebrities, etc. How do you think people like Jeff Bezos, Tom and Gisele, the Clinton's, the BRF, Lady Gaga, etc. function in the world? They use money and connections to access experiences without anyone looking. And most of those people have less money than Taylor.
If we see Taylor doing something that seems intimate and personal, it's because she wants us to see it. She holds all the cards here.