Gaza War, Part 3

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw, that also decreases the number of civilians killed. So maybe genocide might be a reach.


"Genocide" has always been a reach. But then again, it's not a reach to people who deny that 6 million Jews were systematically and deliberately killed by the Nazis.

Yes, the Holocaust happened unfortunately, but almost everyone responsible for this atrocity is dead today. Hopefully, as Americans anyway, we have learned from this and move on and try and realize that most American nonJews born after WWII, in my experience anyway, harbor no hatred or prejudice toward Jews, they’re indifferent, they don’t even realize who is jewish or not. It’s not a topic of conversation for most American non jewish people, it’s a nonissue. I have jewish friends who I didn’t even reaize were jewish initially, they live productive comfortable lives here in the US.


In case you missed it, there has been a huge increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S.

No, I didn’t miss it and it’s horrific. But it’s not the only atrocity occurring in the US currently. And why we need to concern ourselves with the ME is beyond me. Most Americans have no dog in this fight.


Well, thankfully, isolationism doesn't prevail in the US.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those who argue that Jews do not a historical connection to Israel are wrong. They were there before their opponents.


Genetic testing says, uhhh bullshit.


False. Genetic testing confirms ties as do thousands upon thousands of architectural excavations. To deny Jews’ historical presence there is just wrong. I mean heck, there’s even an ancient Jewish Temple in Gaza, for Christ’s sake. Oh yeah, Christ too! A Jewish man. Er, wait, a Palestinian Jew?


Furthermore the Jews were there long before Christianity or Islam was concocted.


Yeah, all true. The problem is that the people calling themselves Jews in 2024 like Netanyahu and Smotrich have about as much ancient Jewish blood in them as I do, which is a lengthy way to say “none”.


There is no such thing as " Jewish Blood" . You talk like a Zealot.

The vast majority of Arabs in Palestine, Lebanon & Syria are the exact same haplotype as Sephardic Jews: E1b1

They are the same " people "

You can’t have it both ways though, if the Palestinians have more middle eastern blood, they have a right to remain exactly where they are. How can one argue to remove them? Yes, the Sephardic jews have a right to be there fine, but the remaining nonSephardic have zero ties there. It is what it is. These are Europeans.


Deep breaths. I think you mean Mizrahi. Study up.

Ok why do half or more European persons have a right to force indigenous people out? We are still allowing this to happen in 2024?


What makes them "indigenous?" Because they colonized the area several hundred years ago, during the Arab conquests of muslim expansion? And what makes Jews somehow not indigenous, given they originated there, and the land used to be known as Judea, and have DNA ties to the area?


Why do you refuse to address the irrefutable fact that the genetic ties of the typical regional Jew to that specific region is far less significant (i.e., comparatively inferior) than the genetic tie of the typical regional Arab to that specific region?


Based on what? Based on comparing the DNA of a modern-day Palestinian to the DNA of a Palestinian Arab from 300 years ago? So what?


No, based on the fact that genetic testing confirms that nearly 100% of Palestinians are 100% genetically tied to the region, and less than 10% of Israelis are 100% tied to the region.


Those numbers are 100% made up. Palestinian DNA shows haplotypes connecting them to Lebanese, Egyptian, Iranian, Armenian, Turk et cetera et cetera et cetera. They aren't uniquely Palestinian and uniquely tied to the area as you claim. Instead, their DNA tells the story of Muslim conquest and then Ottoman rule, migrations of people into the area, intermarriages and so on. If you want to claim that Jews are somehow disqualified because of migrations and intermarriages then Palestinians are no better.


A lot of Gaza was settled by Egyptians in the 19th century. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x


Cool story, bro. Now that you've prayed to St. Google for search engine justification for already entrenched position, are you signing-up for genetic testing of all in the region to sort all of this out? What's that? No? Yeah, that's what we thought ...


"Cool story bro?"

Sorry but a scholarly research article published in a peer-reviewed journal of Middle East studies by far outranks your juvenile OPINIONS. Every. Single. Day.


Did you share a link to the article containing that peer reviewed research?


Yes, it was shared above. But for people who didn't want to click on it for whatever imagined "it's hasbara" reasons... Here's a cite

Frantzman, S.J. and Kark, R. (2013), The Muslim Settlement of Late Ottoman and Mandatory Palestine: Comparison with Jewish Settlement Patterns. Digest of Middle East Studies, 22: 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x

And a doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw, that also decreases the number of civilians killed. So maybe genocide might be a reach.


"Genocide" has always been a reach. But then again, it's not a reach to people who deny that 6 million Jews were systematically and deliberately killed by the Nazis.

Yes, the Holocaust happened unfortunately, but almost everyone responsible for this atrocity is dead today. Hopefully, as Americans anyway, we have learned from this and move on and try and realize that most American nonJews born after WWII, in my experience anyway, harbor no hatred or prejudice toward Jews, they’re indifferent, they don’t even realize who is jewish or not. It’s not a topic of conversation for most American non jewish people, it’s a nonissue. I have jewish friends who I didn’t even reaize were jewish initially, they live productive comfortable lives here in the US.


In case you missed it, there has been a huge increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S.


There's a huge increase in all kinds of -isms in the US - Jews aren't special in the hatred they get.


Jews make up a tiny part of the population but are victims of the most hate crimes of any religious groups. So, sorry, but they are special in the hatred directed against them.

Historically? okay. The here and now in the US? I don’t know, all I know is I am worried about mentally ill children/teens/adults having access to firearms and no mental health resources amongst other pressing issues. I have zero connection or ties to the ME and neither do most Americans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those who argue that Jews do not a historical connection to Israel are wrong. They were there before their opponents.


Genetic testing says, uhhh bullshit.


False. Genetic testing confirms ties as do thousands upon thousands of architectural excavations. To deny Jews’ historical presence there is just wrong. I mean heck, there’s even an ancient Jewish Temple in Gaza, for Christ’s sake. Oh yeah, Christ too! A Jewish man. Er, wait, a Palestinian Jew?


Furthermore the Jews were there long before Christianity or Islam was concocted.


Yeah, all true. The problem is that the people calling themselves Jews in 2024 like Netanyahu and Smotrich have about as much ancient Jewish blood in them as I do, which is a lengthy way to say “none”.


There is no such thing as " Jewish Blood" . You talk like a Zealot.

The vast majority of Arabs in Palestine, Lebanon & Syria are the exact same haplotype as Sephardic Jews: E1b1

They are the same " people "

You can’t have it both ways though, if the Palestinians have more middle eastern blood, they have a right to remain exactly where they are. How can one argue to remove them? Yes, the Sephardic jews have a right to be there fine, but the remaining nonSephardic have zero ties there. It is what it is. These are Europeans.


Deep breaths. I think you mean Mizrahi. Study up.

Ok why do half or more European persons have a right to force indigenous people out? We are still allowing this to happen in 2024?


What makes them "indigenous?" Because they colonized the area several hundred years ago, during the Arab conquests of muslim expansion? And what makes Jews somehow not indigenous, given they originated there, and the land used to be known as Judea, and have DNA ties to the area?


Why do you refuse to address the irrefutable fact that the genetic ties of the typical regional Jew to that specific region is far less significant (i.e., comparatively inferior) than the genetic tie of the typical regional Arab to that specific region?


Based on what? Based on comparing the DNA of a modern-day Palestinian to the DNA of a Palestinian Arab from 300 years ago? So what?


No, based on the fact that genetic testing confirms that nearly 100% of Palestinians are 100% genetically tied to the region, and less than 10% of Israelis are 100% tied to the region.


Those numbers are 100% made up. Palestinian DNA shows haplotypes connecting them to Lebanese, Egyptian, Iranian, Armenian, Turk et cetera et cetera et cetera. They aren't uniquely Palestinian and uniquely tied to the area as you claim. Instead, their DNA tells the story of Muslim conquest and then Ottoman rule, migrations of people into the area, intermarriages and so on. If you want to claim that Jews are somehow disqualified because of migrations and intermarriages then Palestinians are no better.


A lot of Gaza was settled by Egyptians in the 19th century. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x


Cool story, bro. Now that you've prayed to St. Google for search engine justification for already entrenched position, are you signing-up for genetic testing of all in the region to sort all of this out? What's that? No? Yeah, that's what we thought ...


"Cool story bro?"

Sorry but a scholarly research article published in a peer-reviewed journal of Middle East studies by far outranks your juvenile OPINIONS. Every. Single. Day.


Did you share a link to the article containing that peer reviewed research?


Yes, it was shared above. But for people who didn't want to click on it for whatever imagined "it's hasbara" reasons... Here's a cite

Frantzman, S.J. and Kark, R. (2013), The Muslim Settlement of Late Ottoman and Mandatory Palestine: Comparison with Jewish Settlement Patterns. Digest of Middle East Studies, 22: 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x

And a doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x


And that's just one of MANY articles that talk about the flow of other Muslim populations into Gaza and other areas of Palestine. Trying to make claims suggesting 100% of Palestinians have very deep and long reaching historical DNA ties or that they are a monolithic bloc of people who have lived there since the beginning of recorded time is either completely uninformed, or is just plain disingenuous and dishonest.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw, that also decreases the number of civilians killed. So maybe genocide might be a reach.


"Genocide" has always been a reach. But then again, it's not a reach to people who deny that 6 million Jews were systematically and deliberately killed by the Nazis.

Yes, the Holocaust happened unfortunately, but almost everyone responsible for this atrocity is dead today. Hopefully, as Americans anyway, we have learned from this and move on and try and realize that most American nonJews born after WWII, in my experience anyway, harbor no hatred or prejudice toward Jews, they’re indifferent, they don’t even realize who is jewish or not. It’s not a topic of conversation for most American non jewish people, it’s a nonissue. I have jewish friends who I didn’t even reaize were jewish initially, they live productive comfortable lives here in the US.


In case you missed it, there has been a huge increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S.


There's a huge increase in all kinds of -isms in the US - Jews aren't special in the hatred they get.


Jews make up a tiny part of the population but are victims of the most hate crimes of any religious groups. So, sorry, but they are special in the hatred directed against them.

Historically? okay. The here and now in the US? I don’t know, all I know is I am worried about mentally ill children/teens/adults having access to firearms and no mental health resources amongst other pressing issues. I have zero connection or ties to the ME and neither do most Americans.


Did you know that it's actually possible to be concerned about more than one thing at a time? And that one can be concerned about Jews even if you aren't one? I'm not Jewish and in fact have some Arab Muslim blood but I have many Jewish friends, a few of whom have directly experienced threatening and harrassing behaviors toward their communities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw, that also decreases the number of civilians killed. So maybe genocide might be a reach.


"Genocide" has always been a reach. But then again, it's not a reach to people who deny that 6 million Jews were systematically and deliberately killed by the Nazis.

Yes, the Holocaust happened unfortunately, but almost everyone responsible for this atrocity is dead today. Hopefully, as Americans anyway, we have learned from this and move on and try and realize that most American nonJews born after WWII, in my experience anyway, harbor no hatred or prejudice toward Jews, they’re indifferent, they don’t even realize who is jewish or not. It’s not a topic of conversation for most American non jewish people, it’s a nonissue. I have jewish friends who I didn’t even reaize were jewish initially, they live productive comfortable lives here in the US.


In case you missed it, there has been a huge increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S.


There's a huge increase in all kinds of -isms in the US - Jews aren't special in the hatred they get.


Jews make up a tiny part of the population but are victims of the most hate crimes of any religious groups. So, sorry, but they are special in the hatred directed against them.

Historically? okay. The here and now in the US? I don’t know, all I know is I am worried about mentally ill children/teens/adults having access to firearms and no mental health resources amongst other pressing issues. I have zero connection or ties to the ME and neither do most Americans.


Did you know that it's actually possible to be concerned about more than one thing at a time? And that one can be concerned about Jews even if you aren't one? I'm not Jewish and in fact have some Arab Muslim blood but I have many Jewish friends, a few of whom have directly experienced threatening and harrassing behaviors toward their communities.

We need to prioritize our issues though to make any progress.
Anonymous
American students being shot by mentally ill American students should take precedence over any other global issue.
Anonymous
Perhaps some of the American multibillionaires out there would like to weigh in on the school shooting atrocities and demand some changes.
Anonymous
It’s not up to 6mil students yet so I guess we have to wait a while.
Anonymous
And it’s mostly kids we’re talking about here being killed almost daily in US schools. But I guess it’s not bad enough to warrant attention from VIPs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Btw, that also decreases the number of civilians killed. So maybe genocide might be a reach.


"Genocide" has always been a reach. But then again, it's not a reach to people who deny that 6 million Jews were systematically and deliberately killed by the Nazis.

Yes, the Holocaust happened unfortunately, but almost everyone responsible for this atrocity is dead today. Hopefully, as Americans anyway, we have learned from this and move on and try and realize that most American nonJews born after WWII, in my experience anyway, harbor no hatred or prejudice toward Jews, they’re indifferent, they don’t even realize who is jewish or not. It’s not a topic of conversation for most American non jewish people, it’s a nonissue. I have jewish friends who I didn’t even reaize were jewish initially, they live productive comfortable lives here in the US.


In case you missed it, there has been a huge increase in antisemitic incidents in the U.S.


There's a huge increase in all kinds of -isms in the US - Jews aren't special in the hatred they get.


Jews make up a tiny part of the population but are victims of the most hate crimes of any religious groups. So, sorry, but they are special in the hatred directed against them.

Historically? okay. The here and now in the US? I don’t know, all I know is I am worried about mentally ill children/teens/adults having access to firearms and no mental health resources amongst other pressing issues. I have zero connection or ties to the ME and neither do most Americans.


No, this is the here and now. Yes, gun control is a key issue. But the GOP doesn’t think so, and that is on them.
Anonymous
Most Americans prioritize national issues based on their demographic, gun control and mass murder of American children ranks #1 for me personally, the illegal drug/fentanyl/zylazine trade ranks a close 2nd. The conflict in the ME, while on my radar, really doesn’t impact me directly, it really depends on the demographic being considered. It’s just a shame that Americans never seem to be on the same page. That’s why things will never resolve.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those who argue that Jews do not a historical connection to Israel are wrong. They were there before their opponents.


Genetic testing says, uhhh bullshit.


False. Genetic testing confirms ties as do thousands upon thousands of architectural excavations. To deny Jews’ historical presence there is just wrong. I mean heck, there’s even an ancient Jewish Temple in Gaza, for Christ’s sake. Oh yeah, Christ too! A Jewish man. Er, wait, a Palestinian Jew?


There were ancient Canaanites in the area long, long, long before there were Jews, Christians, or Muslims. The land was inhabited for tens of millennia before Judaism was even invented. Why should just one -- of the many different religious groups that have lived there -- have a special claim to this piece of land?


Last time I checked, two “religious groups” — those who are called Muslims and Jews are making “special” claims to “this piece of land. Not sure where the Canaanites fit in in 2024.


The struggle is between Palestinians and Zionists, not between Muslims and Jews. Palestinians are not exclusively Muslim (they include Christian and other denominations), and Zionists are not exclusively Jewish (many are agnostic or atheist). Additionally, neither Islam nor Judaism is monolithic, as there is great diversity within each tradition.

One can't argue that being Jewish or having a few drops of Jewish blood is proof of indigeneity and therefore land ownership when Judaism was invented tens of millennia after the land was already populated with homo sapiens. The claim then moves to Judaism being older than Christianity or Islam. Does this precedent apply if the descendants of polytheistic/animistic people whose ancestors lived in the southern Levant 30,000 years ago suddenly decide to take over what is now Israel? Are they the true indigenous people because they practiced their religion there first? These "me first!" claims based on archaic religious practices from millennia ago are truly absurd, even if you believe the ancient fables they're based on. In any case, establishing a religion in a particular region does not give you ownership of the land. Buddhism developed in India, which does not give Buddhists a license to create a Buddhist state in India and ethnically cleanse the ~80% of the population that is Hindu. Hinduism preceded Buddhism, which does not give Hindus the right to subjugate Buddhists or to ethnically cleanse them from the land.


I can’t take your argument seriously when you say things like “truly absurd” and “ancient fables.”


But it is "truly absurd." It is truly absurd that just one of the many, many groups whose ancestors lived in the area thousands of years ago should have sole right to control that land, particularly when many of them also have ancestry from other parts of the world. What is the precedent here? If you live in the USA, are you planning on evacuating your home and giving it to whichever Native American nation once lived there? If you have Viking ancestry, are you automatically entitled to Norwegian citizenship? This is not how modern citizenship works. What about the many non-Jewish groups that have lived in what is now Israel over the millennia? Or people whose ancestors may have been Jewish at some point but who, over the millennia, converted to other religions or secularized? Many Palestinians come from families that have lived in the region for many thousands of years and come from the same genetic stock that Jews originally come from. Are non-Jewish Palestinians more or less "indigenous" to the region than Jews?

As for "ancient fables," every religion has its stories. Do you believe Adam and Eve were the first humans? One can be a devout adherent of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam and yet see the creation story (and other biblical accounts) as allegorical or mythical. It was once believed that Moses wrote most of the Torah. Now it is generally assumed that it was written much more recently, many centuries after most of the events it supposedly describes. There is no historical evidence that Moses (or Noah, Abraham, Isaac, or Jacob) existed. At some point, probably around the time the books of the Hebrew Bible were written, historical events begin to permeate the biblical narrative. However, even as recently as the New Testament, there are contradictions between the gospel accounts that undermine an entirely literal interpretation. Even when they contain some historic truths, biblical stories are unlikely to be entirely factual.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those who argue that Jews do not a historical connection to Israel are wrong. They were there before their opponents.


Genetic testing says, uhhh bullshit.


False. Genetic testing confirms ties as do thousands upon thousands of architectural excavations. To deny Jews’ historical presence there is just wrong. I mean heck, there’s even an ancient Jewish Temple in Gaza, for Christ’s sake. Oh yeah, Christ too! A Jewish man. Er, wait, a Palestinian Jew?


There were ancient Canaanites in the area long, long, long before there were Jews, Christians, or Muslims. The land was inhabited for tens of millennia before Judaism was even invented. Why should just one -- of the many different religious groups that have lived there -- have a special claim to this piece of land?


And before that, there were Neanderthals and before that amoebas. Maybe we should just give our homes back to them…

Well, yes this is the game we are playing. We preach about how the white Europeans ‘stole’ American indigenous land, yet we turcom and support and encourage it from another country. European jewish people don’t have direct roots to the middle east.


That wasn’t exactly my point. The fact is, Jews are indigenous to the land. It’s a fact. Now they are back and living in Israel again. Face it. Deal with it. They have tried to live peacefully with Palestinians who have rejected every two state solution offered to them. At some point, Palestinians need to accept that Israel is here to stay and find a way to live peacefully with their neighbors and Vice Versa.

If they show they are peaceful actors instead of barbaric anti semites, I’m quite sure that eventually they can integrate. Wouldn’t that be something? Doubt it’ll ever happen though. It would destroy everything they believe in. Their society would have nothing left.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Those who argue that Jews do not a historical connection to Israel are wrong. They were there before their opponents.


Genetic testing says, uhhh bullshit.


False. Genetic testing confirms ties as do thousands upon thousands of architectural excavations. To deny Jews’ historical presence there is just wrong. I mean heck, there’s even an ancient Jewish Temple in Gaza, for Christ’s sake. Oh yeah, Christ too! A Jewish man. Er, wait, a Palestinian Jew?


Furthermore the Jews were there long before Christianity or Islam was concocted.


Yeah, all true. The problem is that the people calling themselves Jews in 2024 like Netanyahu and Smotrich have about as much ancient Jewish blood in them as I do, which is a lengthy way to say “none”.


There is no such thing as " Jewish Blood" . You talk like a Zealot.

The vast majority of Arabs in Palestine, Lebanon & Syria are the exact same haplotype as Sephardic Jews: E1b1

They are the same " people "

You can’t have it both ways though, if the Palestinians have more middle eastern blood, they have a right to remain exactly where they are. How can one argue to remove them? Yes, the Sephardic jews have a right to be there fine, but the remaining nonSephardic have zero ties there. It is what it is. These are Europeans.


Deep breaths. I think you mean Mizrahi. Study up.

Ok why do half or more European persons have a right to force indigenous people out? We are still allowing this to happen in 2024?


What makes them "indigenous?" Because they colonized the area several hundred years ago, during the Arab conquests of muslim expansion? And what makes Jews somehow not indigenous, given they originated there, and the land used to be known as Judea, and have DNA ties to the area?


Why do you refuse to address the irrefutable fact that the genetic ties of the typical regional Jew to that specific region is far less significant (i.e., comparatively inferior) than the genetic tie of the typical regional Arab to that specific region?


Based on what? Based on comparing the DNA of a modern-day Palestinian to the DNA of a Palestinian Arab from 300 years ago? So what?


No, based on the fact that genetic testing confirms that nearly 100% of Palestinians are 100% genetically tied to the region, and less than 10% of Israelis are 100% tied to the region.


Those numbers are 100% made up. Palestinian DNA shows haplotypes connecting them to Lebanese, Egyptian, Iranian, Armenian, Turk et cetera et cetera et cetera. They aren't uniquely Palestinian and uniquely tied to the area as you claim. Instead, their DNA tells the story of Muslim conquest and then Ottoman rule, migrations of people into the area, intermarriages and so on. If you want to claim that Jews are somehow disqualified because of migrations and intermarriages then Palestinians are no better.


A lot of Gaza was settled by Egyptians in the 19th century. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x


Cool story, bro. Now that you've prayed to St. Google for search engine justification for already entrenched position, are you signing-up for genetic testing of all in the region to sort all of this out? What's that? No? Yeah, that's what we thought ...


"Cool story bro?"

Sorry but a scholarly research article published in a peer-reviewed journal of Middle East studies by far outranks your juvenile OPINIONS. Every. Single. Day.


Did you share a link to the article containing that peer reviewed research?


Yes, it was shared above. But for people who didn't want to click on it for whatever imagined "it's hasbara" reasons... Here's a cite

Frantzman, S.J. and Kark, R. (2013), The Muslim Settlement of Late Ottoman and Mandatory Palestine: Comparison with Jewish Settlement Patterns. Digest of Middle East Studies, 22: 74-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x

And a doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-3606.2012.00172.x


That article doesn’t contradict in any way the position that Israelis have a vastly inferior genetic tie to the region (in relation to the Palestinian population).

So what’s your point? That people indigenous to the broader region moved around during the pre-mandate and mandate periods?

That’s irrelevant to the discussion. Are you seriously trying to argue that groups that moved up to 75 miles to their current location are no more indigenous to that region than those who moved 5,700 miles to the region?
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: