APS - School Shifts in the Fall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?
Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

Surreee. I’m sure he wasn’t thinking oh I can make it look like it’s someone else! And then FOIA cubed happen and we all know there was only one FOIA of the FOIA (still confused why the original one was a big deal but okay). So then today he thought I’ll make it seem like it’s someone at APS... heheh evil laugh oh crap that didn’t work either back to protected. Was enlighten to see the only people who liked this trolls tweet’s. You don’t just stumble upon someone’s feed on Twitter - that’s not how it works.

[Anonymous]

anyone else flipping off O'Grady on their screen tonight?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?

Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

I'm pretty sure the style of posting will be narrowed down pretty quickly from AEM / SR folks. She/he should be ashamed.. maybe their kids can give them some schooling on morals.

I'm curious too but not enough to put any energy into it. When you start talking about analyzing style of writing, you sound unhinged. (maybe you are?)

Oh, it’s obviously BE. Who else but a law firm partner would refer to a junior associate’s abilities as a put down? I’m sure someone at the firm saw it and told him to shut it down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?

Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

I'm pretty sure the style of posting will be narrowed down pretty quickly from AEM / SR folks. She/he should be ashamed.. maybe their kids can give them some schooling on morals.

I'm curious too but not enough to put any energy into it. When you start talking about analyzing style of writing, you sound unhinged. (maybe you are?)

Oh, it’s obviously BE. Who else but a law firm partner would refer to a junior associate’s abilities as a put down? I’m sure someone at the firm saw it and told him to shut it down.

Yep, I had the same thought. No one who works for APS is going to refer to “junior associate level thinking.” That’s a big law mindset.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Recall SB lady is posting on AEM today. Very ballsy!

You seem very invested in trying to derail this discussion.

I'm all-in on the discussion. I do think though it's funny that no one has ever commented on the actual screenshots - the SB recall.

What is Turner's position on the SB recall? Let me guess - you'll skip right over that one again.

It's called deflection. And APE is very good at it.

Why are you attacking APE? Did you read The above? They stated that MT already spelled out her position on the SB recall buried in a AEM thread. If you want to read it, it is there. Scroll up. But I'm sure it's easier for you to attack APE.

She did not. Or if she did she deleted it.

I went back and read through every single post on that dumb thread.

No it was explained in the thread here. Sorry I wasn't clear. I just went into AEM and did a quick search for her name, his name & recall and found it. Cutting and pasting here for you.

BE: thanks for your questions. APE has on several occasions noted that there is no "APE lawsuit," and I've posted in this forum about it as well. As a candidate for School Board, I support measures which would return APS to in-person instruction for more days this school year, for those families and children who need/want it. I don't support measures that don't advance that cause, and you may count in that category the lawsuit and the recall. Finally, as several have already noted, neither the lawsuit or the recall are backed by APE (nor the Republican party to my knowledge, though I'm a Democrat).

Yes Miranda said she doesn't support the recall. But she is on the Steering Committee of APE and EHN's post said APE is considering a recall of Board members. It didn't say "I" or even "we." It said APE.

Of course they all want to run from it now that they got exposed and it looks bad....

and really what chance did they have to recall anyways?

+1. APE sure didn't like that being out there did they?

All i will say about SR and APE is that one group has people infiltrating the other to take screen shots to try to “out” them in some way, while the other does not. That tells me a lot about who has integrity and who doesn’t.

GMAFB. APE members were attempting to doxx teachers. Tell us more about that integrity.

Not to mention slimy Republicans who sue APS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, the Twitter account has been locked down again. Their bravado didn’t last long...

ZOMG. It feels like we're watching someone have a meltdown. Really sad.

And Arlington is, in the end, a small community.

Which is why it was so disheartening to watch neighbors trash teachers on AEM.

I’ve lost so much respect for my neighbors.

I love our teachers, but it is so disheartening to watch/listen to so many refuse our students from receiving an actual in-person education. This past year is the dumbest down version of an education imaginable (thanks Dr Duran and Loft). It's pathetic and I wish more teachers and APS staff would advocate for more in-person education since they know it's what is best.

It wasn’t their decision FFS.

You are the a-hole here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:anyone else flipping off O'Grady on their screen tonight?

Ooh, catch me up? I just got home and will have to wait for the recording to post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, the Twitter account has been locked down again. Their bravado didn’t last long...

ZOMG. It feels like we're watching someone have a meltdown. Really sad.

And Arlington is, in the end, a small community.

Which is why it was so disheartening to watch neighbors trash teachers on AEM.

I’ve lost so much respect for my neighbors.

Agreed. I have co-workers in there and have to interact with them all day long while pretending I haven’t seen them act like total assholes. Has definitely changed me view of some people.

Wait. I have to release those screenshots after all? Damn.

What screenshots are those? That some people follow the account? It's an anti-APE account, so it hardly seems surprising that folks who are on the opposite side of this debate are at least nominally interested in it. I follow all sorts of twitter accounts, some of whom I like and some of whom I don't. Has anyone else noticed that there are a bunch of troll accounts on both sides all over NOVA? No one is pure in this and everyone needs to grow up. Let's get back to the real issues please.

It’s funny how that PP is just so 100% convinced. Probably the same idiotic PP who was 100% convinced I was someone posting on AEM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?
Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

Surreee. I’m sure he wasn’t thinking oh I can make it look like it’s someone else! And then FOIA cubed happen and we all know there was only one FOIA of the FOIA (still confused why the original one was a big deal but okay). So then today he thought I’ll make it seem like it’s someone at APS... heheh evil laugh oh crap that didn’t work either back to protected. Was enlighten to see the only people who liked this trolls tweet’s. You don’t just stumble upon someone’s feed on Twitter - that’s not how it works.

No. We don’t know that at all.

You are mental.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, the Twitter account has been locked down again. Their bravado didn’t last long...

ZOMG. It feels like we're watching someone have a meltdown. Really sad.

And Arlington is, in the end, a small community.

Which is why it was so disheartening to watch neighbors trash teachers on AEM.

I’ve lost so much respect for my neighbors.

Agreed. I have co-workers in there and have to interact with them all day long while pretending I haven’t seen them act like total assholes. Has definitely changed me view of some people.

Wait. I have to release those screenshots after all? Damn.

I have no idea what you are talking about because no one was taking about screenshots in this particular discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?
Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

Surreee. I’m sure he wasn’t thinking oh I can make it look like it’s someone else! And then FOIA cubed happen and we all know there was only one FOIA of the FOIA (still confused why the original one was a big deal but okay). So then today he thought I’ll make it seem like it’s someone at APS... heheh evil laugh oh crap that didn’t work either back to protected. Was enlighten to see the only people who liked this trolls tweet’s. You don’t just stumble upon someone’s feed on Twitter - that’s not how it works.

No. We don’t know that at all.

You are mental.

Per APS, there was only one FOIA request. The apeshit Twitter account doesn’t even claim otherwise, they’re claiming they got the screen shot from a non-FOIA source within APS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, the Twitter account has been locked down again. Their bravado didn’t last long...

ZOMG. It feels like we're watching someone have a meltdown. Really sad.

And Arlington is, in the end, a small community.

Which is why it was so disheartening to watch neighbors trash teachers on AEM.

I’ve lost so much respect for my neighbors.

Agreed. I have co-workers in there and have to interact with them all day long while pretending I haven’t seen them act like total assholes. Has definitely changed me view of some people.

Wait. I have to release those screenshots after all? Damn.

What screenshots are those? That some people follow the account? It's an anti-APE account, so it hardly seems surprising that folks who are on the opposite side of this debate are at least nominally interested in it. I follow all sorts of twitter accounts, some of whom I like and some of whom I don't. Has anyone else noticed that there are a bunch of troll accounts on both sides all over NOVA? No one is pure in this and everyone needs to grow up. Let's get back to the real issues please.

I took screenshots of the entire A***HIT Twitter account yesterday, including the followers. I was being petty at the time, but didn't realize at the time that the account owner would actually make it private after the backlash. Its something that SR doesn't or shouldn't want you to see, because it is obvious it's their people supporting the account. I'm just tired of SR's hypocrisy of being above it all, but really, down in the gutter themselves.

And yes, I learned though that nasty Twitter account that there are similar troll accounts for the "safer school" crowds in FCPS and Alexandria too full of screenshots. Honestly, The entire safer schools crowd should have just stuck to their outdoor lunch and ventilation advocacy, and kept their feelings about APE/Open Schools Now to themselves. We have enough angry dads in Arlington.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Recall SB lady is posting on AEM today. Very ballsy!

You seem very invested in trying to derail this discussion.

I'm all-in on the discussion. I do think though it's funny that no one has ever commented on the actual screenshots - the SB recall.

What is Turner's position on the SB recall? Let me guess - you'll skip right over that one again.

It's called deflection. And APE is very good at it.

Why are you attacking APE? Did you read The above? They stated that MT already spelled out her position on the SB recall buried in a AEM thread. If you want to read it, it is there. Scroll up. But I'm sure it's easier for you to attack APE.

She did not. Or if she did she deleted it.

I went back and read through every single post on that dumb thread.

No it was explained in the thread here. Sorry I wasn't clear. I just went into AEM and did a quick search for her name, his name & recall and found it. Cutting and pasting here for you.

BE: thanks for your questions. APE has on several occasions noted that there is no "APE lawsuit," and I've posted in this forum about it as well. As a candidate for School Board, I support measures which would return APS to in-person instruction for more days this school year, for those families and children who need/want it. I don't support measures that don't advance that cause, and you may count in that category the lawsuit and the recall. Finally, as several have already noted, neither the lawsuit or the recall are backed by APE (nor the Republican party to my knowledge, though I'm a Democrat).

Yes Miranda said she doesn't support the recall. But she is on the Steering Committee of APE and EHN's post said APE is considering a recall of Board members. It didn't say "I" or even "we." It said APE.

Of course they all want to run from it now that they got exposed and it looks bad....

and really what chance did they have to recall anyways?

+1. APE sure didn't like that being out there did they?

All i will say about SR and APE is that one group has people infiltrating the other to take screen shots to try to “out” them in some way, while the other does not. That tells me a lot about who has integrity and who doesn’t.

GMAFB. APE members were attempting to doxx teachers. Tell us more about that integrity.

Not to mention slimy Republicans who sue APS.

Shut it, Sally. No one is impressed by you.

[Anonymous]

It’s interesting to see the Smart Restart people completely losing their minds today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great. I don't have to put in more work, because that Twitter account did it for me. Not a smart look to come back to harass more APE members.

Look at the followers list. Most, if not all SR members. 'Nuff said.

I can't find it

Agree, I'm not on twitter, so I can't see who follows and who the account is following. It's obviously an account made by BE, however, and I find it hysterical he turned it back on and is pretending it's not him because someone screen-shoted it.

This makes no sense. He was obviously fine sharing it under his own name on AEM so why would he put it under an anon account?
Whoever the twitter person is wants to be anonymous.

+1

Surreee. I’m sure he wasn’t thinking oh I can make it look like it’s someone else! And then FOIA cubed happen and we all know there was only one FOIA of the FOIA (still confused why the original one was a big deal but okay). So then today he thought I’ll make it seem like it’s someone at APS... heheh evil laugh oh crap that didn’t work either back to protected. Was enlighten to see the only people who liked this trolls tweet’s. You don’t just stumble upon someone’s feed on Twitter - that’s not how it works.

No. We don’t know that at all.

You are mental.

Per APS, there was only one FOIA request. The apeshit Twitter account doesn’t even claim otherwise, they’re claiming they got the screen shot from a non-FOIA source within APS.

Per APS? Where is THAT screenshot? We only heard that from a THIRDhand source.