Greendland - why not?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:France now sending troops to Greenland as well as Germany, Sweden, Norway, to join danish troops - to defend against USA.


What a waste. We are not invading anyone. Good LORD

You haven't been paying attention.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:France now sending troops to Greenland as well as Germany, Sweden, Norway, to join danish troops - to defend against USA.


While I’m sure the answer is no: is the GOP is Congress doing anything more than “expressing concern” or telling us to take Trump “seriously but not literally”?

There are bipartisan bills against this being drafted in both the house and the senate.


And will they be as effectively enforced as the Epstein Transparency Act? Congress needs to impeach Bondi for noncompliance on that. Then maybe Hegseth will understand the consequences.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:France now sending troops to Greenland as well as Germany, Sweden, Norway, to join danish troops - to defend against USA.


What a waste. We are not invading anyone. Good LORD


The pretense is that they are showing Trump that they will defend Greenland from China and Russia. In reality, they are defending Greenland from the US.
Anonymous
The danish authorities were not able to change the Trump administration‘s mind. So what now, war?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:France now sending troops to Greenland as well as Germany, Sweden, Norway, to join danish troops - to defend against USA.


What a waste. We are not invading anyone. Good LORD


The pretense is that they are showing Trump that they will defend Greenland from China and Russia. In reality, they are defending Greenland from the US.


Wow, to protect us from the Russians that have been giving Trump help for the past 20 or 30 years? The same ones that are right now attacking the ice list website to keep his personal armies identities the secret? Fascinating.
Anonymous
Get ready for them to start dumping our bonds.
Anonymous
The former NATO allies are sending troops to Greenland to defend against a US invasion.

No, I am not kidding.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:France now sending troops to Greenland as well as Germany, Sweden, Norway, to join danish troops - to defend against USA.


What a waste. We are not invading anyone. Good LORD


The pretense is that they are showing Trump that they will defend Greenland from China and Russia. In reality, they are defending Greenland from the US.


Wow, to protect us from the Russians that have been giving Trump help for the past 20 or 30 years? The same ones that are right now attacking the ice list website to keep his personal armies identities the secret? Fascinating.


As we’re both members of nato, we are already more than welcome to add troops or equipment to Greenland. We’ve reduced our troops to 200 over the years. Equipment buildings and runways have sunken into disrepair, and we have just one icebreaker that is often in the shop for repairs.
Chinese warship hasn’t been spotted there for many, many years. Russia has no interest, they have other better wars of monitoring from the arctic. I could go on and on as to why trump is full of it.
We stand to lose so much if we invade.
Anonymous
He’s going to start a war with Iran momentarily, so this might have to wait.

The Epstein files must be really REALLY bad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He’s going to start a war with Iran momentarily, so this might have to wait.

The Epstein files must be really REALLY bad.


Agreed, and he knows it. Hence the whining about “they will impeach me whaa “

He suddenly says he has sources saying all is good in Iran…?!
Yet threatening Greenland, and therefore all of eastern and Western Europe.
This is dementia.
Anonymous
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Is-Greenlands-Oil-Really-Worth-It.html
Is Greenland’s Oil Really Worth It?

By Natalia Katona - Jan 14, 2026, 11:00 AM CST
Greenland Energy and 80 Mile PLC plan two onshore wells in Greenland’s Jameson Land by the summer of 2026, the first exploration wells since 2011.
Independent estimates put unrisked recoverable resources in Greenland at ~4 billion barrels, with ~1.2 billion barrels targeted by the initial wells.
The project’s revival coincides with renewed U.S. strategic interest in Greenland, despite the contested island’s post-2021 ban on new oil licensing

https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Is-Greenlands-Oil-Really-Worth-It.html


Oil, oil and more oil.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The former NATO allies are sending troops to Greenland to defend against a US invasion.

No, I am not kidding.


It's completely pathetic. Germany is sending 13 soldiers. To defend against the most formidable military that has ever existed. It's embarrassing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The former NATO allies are sending troops to Greenland to defend against a US invasion.

No, I am not kidding.


It's completely pathetic. Germany is sending 13 soldiers. To defend against the most formidable military that has ever existed. It's embarrassing.


Miller found DCUM.

You're still short and bald, dude.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The former NATO allies are sending troops to Greenland to defend against a US invasion.

No, I am not kidding.


It's completely pathetic. Germany is sending 13 soldiers. To defend against the most formidable military that has ever existed. It's embarrassing.


It’s a statement more than anything. They are saying they are going to protect Greenland if it comes to it.
Anonymous
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: