The FBI has *ARRESTED* a sitting judge in Milwaukee, over allegations it obstructed immigration enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Paul Clement is going to be defending Judge Duggan.

Good.

Between the fact that the affidavit doesn’t provide any evidence for several elements of the charged crimes, and Patels and Bondis media blitz providing plenty of fodder for publicity motions, he will have plenty to work with.

Actually the agents interfered with the state court. They need to be arrested and charged with the same charges.

Arrests are made in court houses all the time.

but not in a court room...see the difference?

That's a difference, but nothing about this case was going to, or did happen in a court room. Have you not kept up?

ICE had multiple opportunities to arrest the person outside the courtroom but wanted to make a show of doing it in the courtroom. The judge didn't want to be a party to the show Patel was hoping for.

False. They agreed with the chief judge to arrest outside the courtroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Paul Clement is going to be defending Judge Duggan.

Good.

Between the fact that the affidavit doesn’t provide any evidence for several elements of the charged crimes, and Patels and Bondis media blitz providing plenty of fodder for publicity motions, he will have plenty to work with.

Actually the agents interfered with the state court. They need to be arrested and charged with the same charges.

Arrests are made in court houses all the time.

but not in a court room...see the difference?

That's a difference, but nothing about this case was going to, or did happen in a court room. Have you not kept up?

ICE had multiple opportunities to arrest the person outside the courtroom but wanted to make a show of doing it in the courtroom. The judge didn't want to be a party to the show Patel was hoping for.

False. They agreed with the chief judge to arrest outside the courtroom.

DP. No they tried to arrest him inside the courtroom. Now the judge has been arrested. This is lawlessness. A criminal element has taken over federal law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Bottom line: regardless of whether or not you believe the judges deserves to be jailed, the fact remains that her arrest will have long-lasting effects--1) on the relationship between state judiciaries and federal immigration enforcement but also on 2) public perceptions of judicial impartiality and the rule of law. ​The government chose to make an example of her in an effort to stifle future pushback from other state judges around immigration law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Paul Clement is going to be defending Judge Duggan.

Good.

Between the fact that the affidavit doesn’t provide any evidence for several elements of the charged crimes, and Patels and Bondis media blitz providing plenty of fodder for publicity motions, he will have plenty to work with.

Actually the agents interfered with the state court. They need to be arrested and charged with the same charges.

Arrests are made in court houses all the time.

but not in a court room...see the difference?

That's a difference, but nothing about this case was going to, or did happen in a court room. Have you not kept up?

ICE had multiple opportunities to arrest the person outside the courtroom but wanted to make a show of doing it in the courtroom. The judge didn't want to be a party to the show Patel was hoping for.

False. They agreed with the chief judge to arrest outside the courtroom.

DP. No they tried to arrest him inside the courtroom. Now the judge has been arrested. This is lawlessness. A criminal element has taken over federal law enforcement.

I'm still waiting for a credible link that corroborates your accusations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop arguing with Nazis. Speak their language if you want to convince them. Brute force.

Trump officials are “Nazis” ??

ok

[Anonymous]

INDICTED.

[Anonymous]

Thank God. No one should be above the law. —19:15

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Thank God. No one should be above the law. —19:15

Not even the president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
INDICTED.

Well deserved.
FAFO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Thank God. No one should be above the law. —19:15

Not even the president.

Except Joe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
INDICTED.

Well deserved.
FAFO.

+1,000

[Anonymous]

I dislike Trump and think his administration is full of morons… but they got it right here. Judge Duggan overstepped big time. In another administration, this might be a slap on the wrist. Not now. FAFO.

[Anonymous]

From what I have read from legal experts, they may have a case but it's a thin one, and she has some affirmative defenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I dislike Trump and think his administration is full of morons… but they got it right here. Judge Duggan overstepped big time. In another administration, this might be a slap on the wrist. Not now. FAFO.

She did nothing of the sort.

[Anonymous]

Arresting judges, like this one in Milwaukee or elected leaders, like the one in Newark on false or thin charges, are what authoritarians do. This is a shot across the bow.