Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

That’s all they’re here for. We could answer, but they don’t respond when we answer their questions. They know Ginni and Clarence helped out with the GOP’s little bonfire of America; they like the GOP burning it down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

Tell us what you know. I’d take a thousand Dan Rathers over Ginni and Clarence. At least Rather isn’t working against democracy.

He knowingly used false documents to try and take down a President, but ok…..

Look at the certainty on this one.

Meanwhile, in actual reality a political and his wife participated in an attempted coup and he is protecting both himself and his wife from consequences.

[Anonymous]

Clarence and Ginni Thomas are awful. As are many of the people who work with them. There were a bunch of articles about how the trump transition team was dominated by a lot of Clarence Thomas former clerks. Few other former clerks wanted to get near Trump (with good reason)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

Tell us what you know. I’d take a thousand Dan Rathers over Ginni and Clarence. At least Rather isn’t working against democracy.

He knowingly used false documents to try and take down a President, but ok…..

Look at the certainty on this one.

Meanwhile, in actual reality a political and his wife participated in an attempted coup and he is protecting both himself and his wife from consequences.

Well the country has about as much respect for those two as they have for the country...which is not much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

There is nothing in this thread actually linking Clarence Thomas to anything. There are a lot of people that think he is somehow to blame for his wifes actions, and thats not how it works. Are you responsible for everything your spouse does?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

There is nothing in this thread actually linking Clarence Thomas to anything. There are a lot of people that think he is somehow to blame for his wifes actions, and thats not how it works. Are you responsible for everything your spouse does?

Just stop. Go back and read the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

There is nothing in this thread actually linking Clarence Thomas to anything. There are a lot of people that think he is somehow to blame for his wifes actions, and thats not how it works. Are you responsible for everything your spouse does?

Just stop. Go back and read the thread.

+1 It will show you that Clarence earns the vast majority of his money from his wife’s crazy RWNJ activism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

There is nothing in this thread actually linking Clarence Thomas to anything. There are a lot of people that think he is somehow to blame for his wifes actions, and thats not how it works. Are you responsible for everything your spouse does?

Just stop. Go back and read the thread.

+1 It will show you that Clarence earns the vast majority of his money from his wife’s crazy RWNJ activism.

+2
So tedious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.

“Special” is one word for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.

“Special” is one word for it.

It takes a special kind of person to hold someone responsible for the actions of their spouse. I guess if your husband cheats on you, you must be a cheater too based on your logic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.

“Special” is one word for it.

It takes a special kind of person to hold someone responsible for the actions of their spouse. I guess if your husband cheats on you, you must be a cheater too based on your logic.

He’s never disabused the notion that he’s in agreement with her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke.

And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity.

You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you.

What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.

And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?

Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?

PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs.

It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.

“Special” is one word for it.

It takes a special kind of person to hold someone responsible for the actions of their spouse. I guess if your husband cheats on you, you must be a cheater too based on your logic.

He’s never disabused the notion that he’s in agreement with her.

He doesn’t have to, that’s not how this works.