Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
And he lied about that. What part do you not understand? Even the NYT points out that the bus story is completely false. Deal with it. |
Anonymous
| Several good points here. Clarence Thomas should be impeached. https://newrepublic.com/article/165118/clarence-thomas-impeachment-case-democrats |
Anonymous
The NYT is basically the GOP’s scribe, a point you definitely do not understand. Look, here’s the Insider https://www.businessinsider.com/man-charged-capitol-riot-went-dc-bus-turning-point-usa-2021-3 saying that Robert Sanford, one of the guys arrested for throwing a fire extinguisher at police officers, rode to DC on a bus paid for by Turning Point USA. You may wish it false, but it was real. |
Anonymous
I agree that POS should be impeached but read step 2. The Democrats do not have an entire propaganda wing at their disposal and the “regular” media is in the tank for the GOP, too. They don’t report on that which is damning to the GOP. |
Anonymous
It is laughable that you're calling the NYT the "GOP's scribe" and expecting people to take you seriously. From your own "source": Andrew Kolvet, a spokesperson for Turning Point Action, told Insider that TPUSA "did not organize any buses and was not involved in any events of Jan 6 in any way." Enjoy your fantasies. |
Anonymous
Every conservative on the Supreme Court was put there by the Federalist society. Their legacy has been unraveling since the 90's. We were just too blind to see it. I am in favor of Supreme Court reform - not court packing, but a fundamental restructuring of how the Court works. |
Anonymous
Ooooh, “spokesperson denies something.” Always a compelling argument. |
Anonymous
No, we believed that the mainstream media would more or less report on things. Actual liberal media, like Mother Jones, Ms. and similar outlets, have been blowing the whistle on the Federalists and what the GOP’s true end game is, but the media that most people consume was content to let the extremists gain power. And here we are. |
Anonymous
+1 It’s right there in the court documents that he got there on the TPUSA bus. I understand that you want to keep up the fiction that right wing extremists bent on destroying the country aren’t right wing extremists bent on destroying the country - how else could you continue to support them, right? - but they are. It’s right there in black and white. Turning Point USA sent buses full of traitors to their country to storm the Capitol and overthrow the government. We’ll probably find out that Charlie whatever his name is deleted tweet exaggerated the number of buses, but Ginni Thomas sits on their board. She knew. She was involved. A sitting SCJ has a wife who participated in an attempt to overthrow the government. I’d say she’s a threat to the entire damn country. |
Anonymous
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know how this isn't a conflict of interest for Justice Thomas. She's literally being paid by parties coming before the SC.
CJ Roberts's historical legacy is circling the toilet very rapidly. [/quote] Every conservative on the Supreme Court was put there by the Federalist society. Their legacy has been unraveling since the 90's. [b]We were just too blind to see it.[/b] I am in favor of Supreme Court reform - not court packing, but a fundamental restructuring of how the Court works.[/quote] No, we believed that the mainstream media would more or less report on things. Actual liberal media, like Mother Jones, Ms. and similar outlets, have been blowing the whistle on the Federalists and what the GOP’s true end game is, but the media that most people consume was content to let the extremists gain power. And here we are. [/quote] You’re right. A good example is Biden’s hot mic incident yesterday. There’s more reporting on that than actual well researched facts about Thomas’ conflicts of interest. Which matters more? |
Anonymous
|
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know how this isn't a conflict of interest for Justice Thomas. She's literally being paid by parties coming before the SC.
CJ Roberts's historical legacy is circling the toilet very rapidly. [/quote] Every conservative on the Supreme Court was put there by the Federalist society. Their legacy has been unraveling since the 90's. [b]We were just too blind to see it.[/b] I am in favor of Supreme Court reform - not court packing, but a fundamental restructuring of how the Court works.[/quote] No, we believed that the mainstream media would more or less report on things. Actual liberal media, like Mother Jones, Ms. and similar outlets, have been blowing the whistle on the Federalists and what the GOP’s true end game is, but the media that most people consume was content to let the extremists gain power. And here we are. [/quote] You’re right. A good example is Biden’s hot mic incident yesterday. There’s more reporting on that than actual well researched facts about Thomas’ conflicts of interest. Which matters more?[/quote] Absolutely the conflicts of interest and the strong political forces that have made the Supreme Court into a panel of political hacks, but it’s something that goes entirely unremarked. It’s the story beneath the story and the media absolutely doesn’t want us focusing on it, and that goes for any number of stories. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
Judicial Watch is funding Ginni Thomas and submitted this amicus brief regarding the affirmative action case currently before SCOTUS. But Clarence Thomas would rather die than appropriately recuse himself from something.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-1199/173494/20210331132404544_210127a%20Amicus%20Brief%20for%20efiling.pdf |
Anonymous
Yes. We knew this from the well researched New Yorker article. Justice Thomas has benefitted in excess of $650k over the last few years from Ginni's work for anti affirmative action groups and he failed to list the income on his financial statements. This clearly suggests guilty knowledge. At the very least he needs to recuse from all cases his wife has an interest in. |