Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone tell me if trump can just keep kicking this can down the road indefinitely? This feels endless.

The grand juries continue to meet and collect evidence. Trump
and his capos continue to throw up roadblocks, the most recent being assertions of attorney-client privilege before Judge Howell in DC. The Fulton County grand jury seems to be in a faster track, despite the efforts of a Texas judge to block enforcement of subpoenas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

[Anonymous]

Marc Short was testifying before one of the DC grand juries today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

The former president has no special rights when it comes to possession of classified documents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

The former president has no special rights when it comes to possession of classified documents.

+1 Biden canceled any right for him to have a clearance or get ongoing briefings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Marc Short was testifying before one of the DC grand juries today.

Kash Patel also sighted outside grand jury room. Sounds like Judge Howell may have resolved the privilege issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?

How do you think classified docs get moved from one place to another?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

The former president has no special rights when it comes to possession of classified documents.

True and irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

My dude was formerly the Wset Wing valet respondible for bringing Diet Cokes to Trump on command when he pushed his little red button. Before that he was a sailor assigned to the Navy canteen located in the White House basement. Trump’s PAC has been paying him $150,000 for “advance consulting services.” Bravo, my dude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?

How do you think classified docs get moved from one place to another?

Trump just thinks about it and it happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Today is a bad day for the Donald.

Ketchup and walls beware.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

Harold Martin would like a word:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-government-contractor-sentenced-nine-years-federal-prison-willful-retention-national

Martin admitted that beginning in the late 1990s and continuing through Aug. 31, 2016, he stole and retained U.S. government property from secure locations and computer systems, including documents in both hard copy and digital form relating to the national defense, that bore markings indicating that they were the property of the United States and contained highly classified information of the United States, including Top Secret/SCI information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The SCI and other highly classified documents should have never been taken out of the SCIF in DC in the first place, so that crime is in DC.

What criminal statute do you think that violates?

That has been cited in this thread several times.

No, it hasn’t. Because an authorized person taking a classified document out of a SCIF is not a crime. If it were, we’d be sending security officers to jail all day for doing their jobs.

Er, security officers don't take classified (TS) documents out of SCIFs. I take it you don't know anyone with clearance?

How do you think classified docs get moved from one place to another?

With authorization, accountability, and specific levels of security/protection. None of which were present in this scenario.