US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks


J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥


If J6 were as bad as claimed, they would have released all the video. They wouldn't have had to lie about the deaths from J6. They would have not covered up the murder of the protestor. The Dems feared sunshine because they were lying, including with the planted pipe bomb.


"Release the video" WTF are you talking about it. We all watched it in real time with our own eyes.


You don't even know because you only believe what the MSM tells you. There are thousands of hours of video that were not released, especially as part of the Star Chamber presentation put on by Dems.

You only know what the tv tells you. Must be a Boomer.

I'm old enough to remember when all the footage was released - to Tucker Carlson. So anything he'd want you to see, you've seen.


There was NOTHING that would ever in a million years somehow magically erase the hours and hours of video that we DID see, of a crazed, brutal MAGA mob violently smashing windows and doors in, fighting with police who were trying to just do their jobs and defend the Capitol, beating them viciously, rampaging through the hallways, overturning furniture, ransacking and vandalizing offices, rifling through files and documents and all the rest. Not one hour, not one million hours of extra video will ever erase any of that.
Anonymous
As Trump continues to say that “we” didn’t have any guns on January 6…
Anonymous
DOJ inspector general says he has found NO evidence that there were any undercover FBI employees at the Capitol or nearby protests on Jan. 6.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:DOJ inspector general says he has found NO evidence that there were any undercover FBI employees at the Capitol or nearby protests on Jan. 6.


DOJ Report: 26 FBI Informants Present at U.S. Capitol on January 6

A new report from the Department of Justice Inspector General (DOJ IG) Michael Horowitz has shed light on the FBI’s controversial use of confidential human sources (CHSs) during the inauguration day protests at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021. The report confirms the presence of 26 FBI informants among the crowds, raising fresh concerns about the bureau’s actions and transparency in handling this pivotal event.

Of the 26 informants identified, only three were officially tasked by the FBI to attend the events. One of these informants entered the Capitol building, while two others accessed restricted areas around it. The remaining 23 CHSs attended the protests on their own initiative, with three entering the Capitol and 11 venturing into restricted zones.
A new report from the Department of Justice Inspector General (DOJ IG) Michael Horowitz has shed light on the FBI’s controversial use of confidential human sources (CHSs) during the inauguration day protests at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021. The report confirms the presence of 26 FBI informants among the crowds, raising fresh concerns about the bureau’s actions and transparency in handling this pivotal event.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/doj-report-26-fbi-informants-present-at-u-s-capitol-on-january-6/
Anonymous
Chris Wray lied about CHS. That’s why he resigned.
Anonymous
If trump pardons all Jan. 6 insurrectionists, then stop your rage about Biden pardon to Hunter or anyone else.
Anonymous
Wow… 26 people?
Remind again how many MAGA morons stormed the capitol?
Was it like 50 or 60?
Can someone help me out? Because 26 human sources is A HUGE Number … if there were about 60 people attacking police that day.
Any one remember how many people were involved that day?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow… 26 people?
Remind again how many MAGA morons stormed the capitol?
Was it like 50 or 60?
Can someone help me out? Because 26 human sources is A HUGE Number … if there were about 60 people attacking police that day.
Any one remember how many people were involved that day?

1600 prosecuted so far.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow… 26 people?
Remind again how many MAGA morons stormed the capitol?
Was it like 50 or 60?
Can someone help me out? Because 26 human sources is A HUGE Number … if there were about 60 people attacking police that day.
Any one remember how many people were involved that day?

1600 prosecuted so far.


So 1600 total people overran the capitol that day? That’s the number?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If trump pardons all Jan. 6 insurrectionists, then stop your rage about Biden pardon to Hunter or anyone else.


If I’m Trump, I don’t pardon them. He’s worried about another insurrection against himself
Anonymous
Trump is already equivocating on his earlier promises on pardons for the rioters.
SUCKERS!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow… 26 people?
Remind again how many MAGA morons stormed the capitol?
Was it like 50 or 60?
Can someone help me out? Because 26 human sources is A HUGE Number … if there were about 60 people attacking police that day.
Any one remember how many people were involved that day?

1600 prosecuted so far.


So 1600 total people overran the capitol that day? That’s the number?

1600 have been prosecuted so far for federal offenses. There were way more that either haven’t been identified or didn’t do anything prosecutable.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow… 26 people?
Remind again how many MAGA morons stormed the capitol?
Was it like 50 or 60?
Can someone help me out? Because 26 human sources is A HUGE Number … if there were about 60 people attacking police that day.
Any one remember how many people were involved that day?

1600 prosecuted so far.


So 1600 total people overran the capitol that day? That’s the number?


No, 1600 prosecuted. The number who entered the capitol was higher.
Anonymous
Wonder if the 26 led the way in? And encouraged others to follow?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If trump pardons all Jan. 6 insurrectionists, then stop your rage about Biden pardon to Hunter or anyone else.


There’s no analogy between pardoning your son vs pardoning traitors. I know that’s not what you’re saying.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: