Baldoni supporter and it’s this. Only Blake had a live claim for damages so only she would be in a position to get money as part of a settlement. |
Bumping |
I don't think the Justin supporters on this thread are all fake. I do think there are bots and fake accounts engaged in upcoming/down voting activity in Reddit, as well as engaging in the brigading on Blake's IG (when comments were open) and on tabloid comment sections and the comment sections for people who support or even are associated with her. These are separate things. There are obviously people who genuinely support Justin. There is also clearly "inorganic" behavior online going after Blake and anyone even mildly associated, plus flodfing comment sections. Both can be true. If Blake were paying for bots, why wouldn't she pay for positive comments in those same places? |
She does, there is just more organic dislike for her than she can outbuy. She is spending millions on pr, including the ex FBI guy that did clean up for Airbnb. |
That doesn't make sense. She's spending millions but you see no evidence of bot comments places like TMZ or Justin's IG account? Most people don't care about either of these people -- it's a tiny fraction of the population that is invested at all, and am even smaller number invested enough to go post angry comments about it. Yet you see many such comments supporting Justin and virtually no activity like that supporting Blake. This does not lead me to the conclusion that Blake is spending millions on bot accounts. |
|
Settlement finally filed with court today, it's a bit different than rumors have been alleging. In fact the case is not totally settled because there is a motion for attorneys fees and damages still pending. But there won't be a trial, at least not between Lively and Wayfarer.
https://www.reddit.com/r/CelebLegalDrama/comments/1t6bog1/it_doesnt_really_end_with_this_blake_lively/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=1 |
There are pro Blake accounts on insta and X, most have shut off or limited comments and therefore get limited traffic. You just don’t understand social media. She’s so disliked on social media that it must be fake is among the stupidest arguments I’ve seen here. In any case, Baldoni certainly isn’t funding bots against Blake. Blake’s lawyers spent million on discovery and came up with nothing. |
A key, and I think confusing, detail: Wayfarer is dropping it's appeal on the 47.1 motion, which is the part of the case still alive and pending a decision. That motion is potentially very expensive for Wayfarer (treble damages in play). They would do that unless avoiding trial was more important to them... right? I mean there is a chance they will win that motion so maybe it works out, but to drop the appeal and still allow the motion for damages to proceed post-settlement? This sounds potentially disastrous. |
The lawyers know that motion won’t be granted. If you think otherwise, you haven’t been paying attention to the judge’s decisions. |
Hmmm. |
|
The settlement is more pro-Blake than the early rumors indicated, but it was accurate that no money has exchanged hands at this point.
(Obviously the new "really Baldoni got paid" claims were entirely spurious, but sure, keep claiming it's Blake people who have been trolls in this thread...) |
Her 40 million followers are not organic either. It’s hundreds of thousands if not millions of bots. It’s just really obvious. A Reddit thread captured that every Friday she buys like 20,000 and it will be like 10 Audrey’s with the same picture, 10 Zoe‘s with the same picture, it’s just so freaking fake. There was also an article about how she used a bike campaign to try to get the Barbie movie. It was really obvious she would go out in like a pink dress and then all of a sudden comments would be flooded with “you should play Barbie” and OMG Barbie!” And it was largely fake and bot driven. All celebs engage in this. And you can’t tell me that Blake’s PR people don’t have very tight relationships with some of the mainstream media who just blatantly manipulated things and got headlines wrong. And I’m sorry but getting a New York Times article about this frivolous dumb movie? That is PR power. That didn’t happen organically. Taylor Swift had been seen shopping around the story, including having a dinner with Ronan Farrow, who didn’t want to take it. |
How is it more pro-Blake than originally reported? |
If this was truly inorganic behavior, the reactions to Blake at the Met gala would have been completely different. Instead, she was getting massive side eye. No celebrities posed for photos with her. Everyone was keeping their distance and rolling their eyes. It’s a bit much to try to suggest that Justin Baldoni controls A-listers at the met gala. Is it really that difficult to believe Blake is an unlikable, aging actress and the backlash is real? It’s insane to insist that every negative reaction to revelations of horrible things she’s done is part of a calculated smear campaign orchestrated by Justin Baldoni. That’s tin foil hat level of crazy. |
DP here and yes Blake does pay for comments on TikTok. they are pretty obvious |