Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ah so now Hollywood elite Blake Lively, married to a billionaire, is a people pleaser and that’s why he was able to sexually harass her. Amazing critical thinking skills from poster who said this. There are posters who are so smart you think, I wonder what they do for a living, and there are other posters where you think, I’m sure she spends her day running target errands.

LOL, so true. This is probably the same person who thinks it's super weird that Plank, a prominent feminist, didn't immediately come out and back her friend and coworker when this all came out and views that as some kind of indictment of his character. A fundamental lack of understanding of how the world works.

[Anonymous]

I’m team Justin. However, I just watched the movie and cannot believe how terrible it is. And I knew it would be awful but it was worse than I imagined. All this over such a dumb movie Christ almighty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m team Justin. However, I just watched the movie and cannot believe how terrible it is. And I knew it would be awful but it was worse than I imagined. All this over such a dumb movie Christ almighty

I only watched it because of the drama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m team Justin. However, I just watched the movie and cannot believe how terrible it is. And I knew it would be awful but it was worse than I imagined. All this over such a dumb movie Christ almighty

I watched it last night, mostly to see the dance part, and all that was there was their feet. I guess that’s what b roll is for, but kinda funny.

But, no, the movie wasn’t good! The only part I kind of appreciated was how they handled the instances of DV (with her being an unreliable narrator). This whole law suit is kinda meta.

[Anonymous]

The shoes she was wearing during the dance were super ugly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The shoes she was wearing during the dance were super ugly!

I wonder if they were the 5k shoes she insisted be purchased, pushing the wardrobe budget.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The shoes she was wearing during the dance were super ugly!

I wonder if they were the 5k shoes she insisted be purchased, pushing the wardrobe budget.

They are Louboutins, so very $$$, but I am not sure if this was an item that was purchased for the movie or from her closet -- I think she wore some of her own clothes in the movie.

[Anonymous]

Scarlet Johansson said that Ryan wanted a wifey who is submissive and was into patriarchy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

On what planet is it ok to ask the trainer about her weight? It’s still inappropriate. Stop making excuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

On what planet is it ok to ask the trainer about her weight? It’s still inappropriate. Stop making excuses.

Disagree. Who cares. Grow up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

On what planet is it ok to ask the trainer about her weight? It’s still inappropriate. Stop making excuses.

Disagree. Who cares. Grow up

Ok. Try asking your therapist, who your friend also sees, to dish on her and see how it goes. Grow up, indeed.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

On what planet is it ok to ask the trainer about her weight? It’s still inappropriate. Stop making excuses.

On the planet where he has back problems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is actually absurd is that people think her harassment case hangs on the interpretation of the one scene.

You can't prove OR disprove a hostile work environment claim by looking at one incident.

Did he enter her trailer unannounced while she was nursing or pumping? Did she ask him not to? Did he do it again?

Did Heath enter the makeup trailer while she was topless even after she asked him not to? Did she ask him to turn around? Did he?

Did Baldoni and Heath suddenly introduce the idea of Lively being fully nude for the birthing scene on the day of the shoot? Did they attempt to show her a video of a nude birth without her consent? Was Lively denied some kind of covering during the filming of the scene when asked? Was the set open or closed?

Did Lively make requests for the IC to be present in certain scenes and was this request respected? Did Baldoni make scenes more intimate or introduce nudity to scenes where it was not scripted, and fail to engage the IC or ensure Lively was giving consent to these changes?

Did Wayfarer properly obtain nudity riders from Lively for all nudity in the movie, and did the film follow contractual obligations of the rider?

Was the IC engaged following typical industry standards?

And then there are all these more minor allegations that could contribute to hostile work environment, if true. Like the allegation that Baldoni told Lively, on multiple occasions and even after she asked him not to, that he was communicating with her dead father. Or the allegation that Baldoni repeatedly discussed pornography with Lively even after she asked him not to, and made fun of the fact that she had disclosed to him that she had never seen pornography to a group of crew members.

I have no idea what the truth to these allegations is. Neither does anyone else on this thread. But this is what the case is about. It does not hinge on whether or not Lively appears to look uncomfortable in a few minutes of b-roll. That footage will be relevant to the case as it concerns one of her allegations. But the case does not revolve around it and if they can prove other allegations, it may not mater if the fact finder concludes that specific institute did not constitute harassment or contribute to hostile work environment.

Y'all are trying to litigate this case without discovery. It's dumb. We don't know! We also may never know if it settles out of court which it probably should, because figuring out the veracity of all of the forgoing allegations is going to be painful and unpleasant for all involved.

When you allege things happened a certain way in your complaint and then recordings of you and texts sent by you disprove that, you have ruined your credibility. That is what happened here.

Exactly. And people are ignoring one major red flag of the scene. Her team was not aware that it had audio. If Blake knew that he had his microphone on, and all their conversation was picked up, guarantee nothing in the scene would have been included because it absolutely does not hold up.

This absolutely damaged her credibility.

And then we are talking about this because this is just the latest. There are so many more she things. She blatantly implied in her suit that he went behind her back to ask her trainer about her weight. Then we find out she set justin up with her and Ryan’s trainer to help with his back problems. There are texts by the trainer, giving him a special program to help strengthen his back. He was talking to Blake’s trainer about his back problems in a way very much sanctioned by her. Certainly lifting her in a scene would be absolutely relevant to both of their safety.

Then we get all the texts about how worried she is about her body, and him being nothing but professional, comforting, telling her absolutely not to worry about it, they’re going to set it up in a way that’s going to make her comfortable.

I’ll say it again, it’s possible she felt uncomfortable for some things going on in this set. It seems like she created a lot of the chaos and she’s clearly taken so many things out of context so it’s hard to believe her about any of the other things.

If she has a case bring forward actual examples that show he was acting inappropriate. If there are five examples where he was, and you bring out five others where he wasn’t, it really is going to hurt your credibility.

On what planet is it ok to ask the trainer about her weight? It’s still inappropriate. Stop making excuses.

On what planet would it not be appropriate to make sure it’s safe to lift her? He has a history of major back problems. 100% appropriate question and actually inappropriate not to for both their safety.

It’s hardly sexual harassment and it had nothing to do with him wanting her to lose weight. Absolutely ridiculous.