Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks make me sick. Only on DCUM would being a virgin through college be a BAD thing.
I guess after reading some of the threads in the relationship forum, I shouldn’t be surprised.

He was sexually frustrated and by all accounts a heavy drinker. Not a good combo in a coed environment.

He was 17. Aren't almost ALL 17 year old males sexually frustrated? You people are insufferable. I wish you all would admit that this whole circus has nothing to do with the alleged incident(s). You just don't want the President's agenda to succeed any any means are justified in your minds.

I think you dont understand that there are a lot of people legitimately very upset that this regularly happens to teenage girls and that the world writes out off as normal sexual frustration.

I don't like the president AND I don't like rape culture. Those two things are not mutually exclusive or contradictory.

And this was not one of those times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Deny, deny, deny, say nothing. Why go on TV? If he believes in fairness, why not wait until Thursday during the hearing?

Righr, because Democrats are playing oh so fair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was, actually, a very compelling interview.

I agree. He convinced me he is lying.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In law school I used to joke with my friends that I used the gprep method when I didn't get my way. Try, try, [and try] again. If I was unable to get my way... I would try again with a new person. Try a new person. It's modeled after what we GPrep/Landon boys do to girls at parties. I doubt Kavanuagh is the exception.

Quit projecting your misconduct onto others. Just because you may have assaulted someone, doesn’t mean he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was, actually, a very compelling interview.

I agree. He convinced me he is lying.

+1

Well so much for keeping an open mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was, actually, a very compelling interview.

It was. I have no doubt he is totally innocent. And, I am angry that the liberals are pulling these stupid, abominable stunts.
I am angry they have put this man and his family through this hell based on NOTHING BUT ALLEGATIONS. NO CORROBORATION AND NO EVIDENCE.

How do you explain his yearbook entries in relation to his saying he never blacked out? How do you square his joking about staying out drinking till 4:30am and that wag at happened at his schools stayed within those schools, only a few years ago with his interview? Genuinely curious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how the same people who believe all the teenagers who say they were abused by priests 30 years ago but who said nothing, refuse to believe a teenager who says she was assaulted by a circuit court judge 30 years ago....only because he is a Republican.

Nobody - NOBODY - has corroborated her story. Not one person who was there. In fact, her friend has stated she doesn’t even KNOW Kavanaugh.
Hard to believe someone when everyone she says was there dispute it.

False. She told a guy that night or the next day. He’s 100% sure she said it was Kavanaugh. Or maybe she made that up knowing that he we would be a Supreme Court nominee 30 years later.

Look up the definition of corroborate and then get back to us.

Sure thing.

cor·rob·o·rate
k??räb??r?t/Submit
verb
confirm or give support to

Bingo. No one has confirmed her version of events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You folks make me sick. Only on DCUM would being a virgin through college be a BAD thing.
I guess after reading some of the threads in the relationship forum, I shouldn’t be surprised.

No one is saying it's a bad thing. But he is obviously lying. You should look at what he wrote about himself on his year book page: The "100 Kegger Party", "Rehoboth Beach Squad", etc.; look it up! We didn't make this up, he wrote it himself!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks make me sick. Only on DCUM would being a virgin through college be a BAD thing.
I guess after reading some of the threads in the relationship forum, I shouldn’t be surprised.

He was sexually frustrated and by all accounts a heavy drinker. Not a good combo in a coed environment.

He was 17. Aren't almost ALL 17 year old males sexually frustrated? You people are insufferable. I wish you all would admit that this whole circus has nothing to do with the alleged incident(s). You just don't want the President's agenda to succeed any any means are justified in your minds.

I think you dont understand that there are a lot of people legitimately very upset that this regularly happens to teenage girls and that the world writes out off as normal sexual frustration.

I don't like the president AND I don't like rape culture. Those two things are not mutually exclusive or contradictory.

And this was not one of those times.

I'm not 100% sure she's telling the truth. I am also not 100% sure he is telling the truth. Anyone claiming either scenario as fact is pure partisan. This is an extremely uncomfortable and public he said she said. We have no real evidence to disprove either side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In law school I used to joke with my friends that I used the gprep method when I didn't get my way. Try, try, [and try] again. If I was unable to get my way... I would try again with a new person. Try a new person. It's modeled after what we GPrep/Landon boys do to girls at parties. I doubt Kavanuagh is the exception.

Quit projecting your misconduct onto others. Just because you may have assaulted someone, doesn’t mean he did.

You're ignorant and projecting. I am not talking about anything sexual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how the same people who believe all the teenagers who say they were abused by priests 30 years ago but who said nothing, refuse to believe a teenager who says she was assaulted by a circuit court judge 30 years ago....only because he is a Republican.

Nobody - NOBODY - has corroborated her story. Not one person who was there. In fact, her friend has stated she doesn’t even KNOW Kavanaugh.
Hard to believe someone when everyone she says was there dispute it.

False. She told a guy that night or the next day. He’s 100% sure she said it was Kavanaugh. Or maybe she made that up knowing that he we would be a Supreme Court nominee 30 years later.

Let’s put the guy under oath. I am skeptical of his version.

And, who exactly has corroborated Ford’s story?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was, actually, a very compelling interview.

I agree. He convinced me he is lying.

+1

Well so much for keeping an open mind.

DP. My mind was open, but Kavanaugh was too cute by half in his answers. I want to hear from the women. That would be more fair than to allow Kavanaugh the chance to attack the claims with no defense. So much for fairness. He’s a huge hypocrite by doing this. No longer a fan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You folks make me sick. Only on DCUM would being a virgin through college be a BAD thing.
I guess after reading some of the threads in the relationship forum, I shouldn’t be surprised.

He was sexually frustrated and by all accounts a heavy drinker. Not a good combo in a coed environment.

He was 17. Aren't almost ALL 17 year old males sexually frustrated? You people are insufferable. I wish you all would admit that this whole circus has nothing to do with the alleged incident(s). You just don't want the President's agenda to succeed any any means are justified in your minds.

I think you dont understand that there are a lot of people legitimately very upset that this regularly happens to teenage girls and that the world writes out off as normal sexual frustration.

I don't like the president AND I don't like rape culture. Those two things are not mutually exclusive or contradictory.

And this was not one of those times.

I'm not 100% sure she's telling the truth. I am also not 100% sure he is telling the truth. Anyone claiming either scenario as fact is pure partisan. This is an extremely uncomfortable and public he said she said. We have no real evidence to disprove either side.

When in doubt, nominate a justice who doesn’t have such a seedy Record like Gorsuch. Easily done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how the same people who believe all the teenagers who say they were abused by priests 30 years ago but who said nothing, refuse to believe a teenager who says she was assaulted by a circuit court judge 30 years ago....only because he is a Republican.

Nobody - NOBODY - has corroborated her story. Not one person who was there. In fact, her friend has stated she doesn’t even KNOW Kavanaugh.
Hard to believe someone when everyone she says was there dispute it.

False. She told a guy that night or the next day. He’s 100% sure she said it was Kavanaugh. Or maybe she made that up knowing that he we would be a Supreme Court nominee 30 years later.

Let’s put the guy under oath. I am skeptical of his version.

And, who exactly has corroborated Ford’s story?

No one. Someone did corroborate Ramirez' story

[Anonymous]

Here's why the people there won't corroborate it--legal jeopardy. They will be charged if they admit being there. Is that so hard to understand, Bannon?