Justin Theroux marries 30yo GF…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread. But if the presumption is that there are objections to some wealthy 54 year old man who takes good care of himself and is extremely successful as an actor/director/producer who happens to find a younger woman as a partner, the delusions are strong here.

Where is the 54 year old woman who adds value to Justin Theroux's life? There are lots of very interesting women in their 30s and 40s. What is a 54 year old women bringing here? Maybe with a little serendipity and charm they can click.

But generally, not happening.

I agree with this and also I think he wanted kids, which made a 54 year old woman not an option. It's hard to adopt at that age. Yes it's unfair that men have this option and women don't, but it's biology. It's not something Justin did. We know he and Aniston spent several years trying to have a baby and were not able to. For all we know, the reason their split was so amicable is because Jen decided she could make peace with not having kids and Justin couldn't, and they may have decided to split specifically so they could each pursue their divergent goals -- Jen to focus on her career and friendships and enjoy her life without kids, Justin to look for a partner to have kids with. Yes it's sad in some ways, but it seems like everyone involved is being an adult about it and Jen has even expressed that she is happy for him. All's well that ends well.

People here just want drama. They want this to be a betrayal of Aniston (even though by all accounts their relationship ended amicably), they want Nicole to be a gold digger, they want the baby to have been something she tricked him into, they want them to break up, etc.

Alternatively these are just people trying to have good lives, like anyone else.

I never bought that Jen Aniston and him wanted kids. people with money can have kids. I am not sure why people don’t understand this -.if they didn’t want to adopt they could get donor eggs. It’s not at all hard if you have money.

Nicole herself said this wasn’t planned. You just can’t convince me that he wanted kids and she didn’t baby trap him.

I don’t think it’s unfair or that men have an advantage. We all get the same amount of time to be in our 20s and 30s whether we are male or female. Justin being with a younger woman doesn’t make him any younger. And his plastic surgery just screams that.

He’s going to be an old dad and that sucks. It’s sad for the kid. It’s sad for him and it’s sad for Nicole. But hey, it’s not my life.

Jen addressed the adoption issue saying she wanted a kid with her DNA. Not sure why they didn’t try surrogacy.

Because she didn’t really want a kid and she can’t say that or she will look bad. There’s always a way.

She also said she wanted to be sure she was with a great guy who would be part of a stable family. She wanted a guy who really wanted a kid with her who would be a amazing dad. That was part of her condition for entertaining motherhood, she was not interested in being a single mom by choice.

I think she (accurately!) Knew in her bones that was not Brad or Justin...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What kind of idiot has a pitbull, let alone with a newborn??

He’s always had pits

And when he got this one, was right after the breakup with Jen and there was no baby on the horizon. He and Jen had a pitt when they were together--that dog disappeared. I assume it was a problem and was sent to a farm or put down.

Jen kept it until it passed away

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread. But if the presumption is that there are objections to some wealthy 54 year old man who takes good care of himself and is extremely successful as an actor/director/producer who happens to find a younger woman as a partner, the delusions are strong here.

Where is the 54 year old woman who adds value to Justin Theroux's life? There are lots of very interesting women in their 30s and 40s. What is a 54 year old women bringing here? Maybe with a little serendipity and charm they can click.

But generally, not happening.

I agree with this and also I think he wanted kids, which made a 54 year old woman not an option. It's hard to adopt at that age. Yes it's unfair that men have this option and women don't, but it's biology. It's not something Justin did. We know he and Aniston spent several years trying to have a baby and were not able to. For all we know, the reason their split was so amicable is because Jen decided she could make peace with not having kids and Justin couldn't, and they may have decided to split specifically so they could each pursue their divergent goals -- Jen to focus on her career and friendships and enjoy her life without kids, Justin to look for a partner to have kids with. Yes it's sad in some ways, but it seems like everyone involved is being an adult about it and Jen has even expressed that she is happy for him. All's well that ends well.

People here just want drama. They want this to be a betrayal of Aniston (even though by all accounts their relationship ended amicably), they want Nicole to be a gold digger, they want the baby to have been something she tricked him into, they want them to break up, etc.

Alternatively these are just people trying to have good lives, like anyone else.

I never bought that Jen Aniston and him wanted kids. people with money can have kids. I am not sure why people don’t understand this -.if they didn’t want to adopt they could get donor eggs. It’s not at all hard if you have money.

Nicole herself said this wasn’t planned. You just can’t convince me that he wanted kids and she didn’t baby trap him.

I don’t think it’s unfair or that men have an advantage. We all get the same amount of time to be in our 20s and 30s whether we are male or female. Justin being with a younger woman doesn’t make him any younger. And his plastic surgery just screams that.

He’s going to be an old dad and that sucks. It’s sad for the kid. It’s sad for him and it’s sad for Nicole. But hey, it’s not my life.

Jen addressed the adoption issue saying she wanted a kid with her DNA. Not sure why they didn’t try surrogacy.

Because she didn’t really want a kid and she can’t say that or she will look bad. There’s always a way.

She also said she wanted to be sure she was with a great guy who would be part of a stable family. She wanted a guy who really wanted a kid with her who would be a amazing dad. That was part of her condition for entertaining motherhood, she was not interested in being a single mom by choice.

I think she (accurately!) Knew in her bones that was not Brad or Justin...

Howe decorator for Brad and Jen said they had reserved a room to decorate later for a baby. I think she wanted kids but never a need or priority to have one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What kind of idiot has a pitbull, let alone with a newborn??

He’s always had pits

And when he got this one, was right after the breakup with Jen and there was no baby on the horizon. He and Jen had a pitt when they were together--that dog disappeared. I assume it was a problem and was sent to a farm or put down.

Jen kept it until it passed away

I don't think so. It was the youngest dog and just suddenly disappeared from the social media of both of them, with no comment. She posted emotional tributes to other dogs who passed away, including one after she and Justin split. He went back to LA for the service. That was not the black and white Pitt, Sophie (I think was her name).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread. But if the presumption is that there are objections to some wealthy 54 year old man who takes good care of himself and is extremely successful as an actor/director/producer who happens to find a younger woman as a partner, the delusions are strong here.

Where is the 54 year old woman who adds value to Justin Theroux's life? There are lots of very interesting women in their 30s and 40s. What is a 54 year old women bringing here? Maybe with a little serendipity and charm they can click.

But generally, not happening.

I agree with this and also I think he wanted kids, which made a 54 year old woman not an option. It's hard to adopt at that age. Yes it's unfair that men have this option and women don't, but it's biology. It's not something Justin did. We know he and Aniston spent several years trying to have a baby and were not able to. For all we know, the reason their split was so amicable is because Jen decided she could make peace with not having kids and Justin couldn't, and they may have decided to split specifically so they could each pursue their divergent goals -- Jen to focus on her career and friendships and enjoy her life without kids, Justin to look for a partner to have kids with. Yes it's sad in some ways, but it seems like everyone involved is being an adult about it and Jen has even expressed that she is happy for him. All's well that ends well.

People here just want drama. They want this to be a betrayal of Aniston (even though by all accounts their relationship ended amicably), they want Nicole to be a gold digger, they want the baby to have been something she tricked him into, they want them to break up, etc.

Alternatively these are just people trying to have good lives, like anyone else.

I never bought that Jen Aniston and him wanted kids. people with money can have kids. I am not sure why people don’t understand this -.if they didn’t want to adopt they could get donor eggs. It’s not at all hard if you have money.

Nicole herself said this wasn’t planned. You just can’t convince me that he wanted kids and she didn’t baby trap him.

I don’t think it’s unfair or that men have an advantage. We all get the same amount of time to be in our 20s and 30s whether we are male or female. Justin being with a younger woman doesn’t make him any younger. And his plastic surgery just screams that.

He’s going to be an old dad and that sucks. It’s sad for the kid. It’s sad for him and it’s sad for Nicole. But hey, it’s not my life.

Jen addressed the adoption issue saying she wanted a kid with her DNA. Not sure why they didn’t try surrogacy.

Because she didn’t really want a kid and she can’t say that or she will look bad. There’s always a way.

She also said she wanted to be sure she was with a great guy who would be part of a stable family. She wanted a guy who really wanted a kid with her who would be a amazing dad. That was part of her condition for entertaining motherhood, she was not interested in being a single mom by choice.

I think she (accurately!) Knew in her bones that was not Brad or Justin...

Howe decorator for Brad and Jen said they had reserved a room to decorate later for a baby. I think she wanted kids but never a need or priority to have one.

Can we not relitigate this, please?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

For celebrity actors, going to your spouse's movie opening (especially if a major opening with tons of industry heavy hitters and lots of major press) is 100% part of your job. It is not a fun party. Walking the red carpet, posing for photos, doing interviews with your spouse, etc. -- it's work.

But also it's just a few hours of work and she could go home after red carpet with no one judging her because she has a new baby at home. But the benefits of that few hours of work is their photo prominently circulating around the world for a few days, keeping her name (and Justin's) more top of mind for directors and producers, and showing people she still looks good immediately after having a baby, which is also a major reason actresses try to do public events shortly after having kids so industry people can see them and be reassured. It sucks that's how it is, but it's an extremely visual business and you will not get work if people don't think you will look camera ready in time for a shoot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

DP. What about parenting would preclude someone with a few weeks old baby from going and doing something for a few hours in the afternoon? If she's breastfeeding, she can pump before she leaves and even pump while she's there if necessary (they are rich and can make sure there's a private space available for that). I'm sure they have a nanny. Her family is local and they seem close, so I would also actually assume her mom or sister could stay with the baby for something like this. You take a car to the event, walk the red carpet, take photos, maybe stay for a little bit to socialize, then go home.

This is extremely normal. I was in a mom support group when my baby was this age and several of the women in our group would sometimes leave their babies home (with nannies or family) just to get a couple hours break for mental health reasons. I don't see what the issue is at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

DP. What about parenting would preclude someone with a few weeks old baby from going and doing something for a few hours in the afternoon? If she's breastfeeding, she can pump before she leaves and even pump while she's there if necessary (they are rich and can make sure there's a private space available for that). I'm sure they have a nanny. Her family is local and they seem close, so I would also actually assume her mom or sister could stay with the baby for something like this. You take a car to the event, walk the red carpet, take photos, maybe stay for a little bit to socialize, then go home.

This is extremely normal. I was in a mom support group when my baby was this age and several of the women in our group would sometimes leave their babies home (with nannies or family) just to get a couple hours break for mental health reasons. I don't see what the issue is at all.

There is no issue. I think posters were mainly confused about the age of the baby. She definitely had not given birth just a couple days before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread. But if the presumption is that there are objections to some wealthy 54 year old man who takes good care of himself and is extremely successful as an actor/director/producer who happens to find a younger woman as a partner, the delusions are strong here.

Where is the 54 year old woman who adds value to Justin Theroux's life? There are lots of very interesting women in their 30s and 40s. What is a 54 year old women bringing here? Maybe with a little serendipity and charm they can click.

But generally, not happening.

I agree with this and also I think he wanted kids, which made a 54 year old woman not an option. It's hard to adopt at that age. Yes it's unfair that men have this option and women don't, but it's biology. It's not something Justin did. We know he and Aniston spent several years trying to have a baby and were not able to. For all we know, the reason their split was so amicable is because Jen decided she could make peace with not having kids and Justin couldn't, and they may have decided to split specifically so they could each pursue their divergent goals -- Jen to focus on her career and friendships and enjoy her life without kids, Justin to look for a partner to have kids with. Yes it's sad in some ways, but it seems like everyone involved is being an adult about it and Jen has even expressed that she is happy for him. All's well that ends well.

People here just want drama. They want this to be a betrayal of Aniston (even though by all accounts their relationship ended amicably), they want Nicole to be a gold digger, they want the baby to have been something she tricked him into, they want them to break up, etc.

Alternatively these are just people trying to have good lives, like anyone else.

I never bought that Jen Aniston and him wanted kids. people with money can have kids. I am not sure why people don’t understand this -.if they didn’t want to adopt they could get donor eggs. It’s not at all hard if you have money.

Nicole herself said this wasn’t planned. You just can’t convince me that he wanted kids and she didn’t baby trap him.

I don’t think it’s unfair or that men have an advantage. We all get the same amount of time to be in our 20s and 30s whether we are male or female. Justin being with a younger woman doesn’t make him any younger. And his plastic surgery just screams that.

He’s going to be an old dad and that sucks. It’s sad for the kid. It’s sad for him and it’s sad for Nicole. But hey, it’s not my life.

Jen addressed the adoption issue saying she wanted a kid with her DNA. Not sure why they didn’t try surrogacy.

Because she didn’t really want a kid and she can’t say that or she will look bad. There’s always a way.

She also said she wanted to be sure she was with a great guy who would be part of a stable family. She wanted a guy who really wanted a kid with her who would be a amazing dad. That was part of her condition for entertaining motherhood, she was not interested in being a single mom by choice.

I think she (accurately!) Knew in her bones that was not Brad or Justin...

I would not compare Brad to Justin. Brad was/is an alcoholic, a womanizer, he famously cheated on Jen, he has a terrible relationship with his ex wife and with his kids, etc. Brad's a mess. He doesn't seem like he'd be a good partner to anyone.

Jen's relationship with Justin seemed pretty chill, and they still friendly. There is zero actual evidence he ever cheated on her (they've both denied it, and the fact that their split was so amicable and that a lot of their friends didn't choose a "side" and continue to hang out with both of them indicates it was just a mutual decision). Jen seemed happy when she was with Justin. I'm sure their relationship had issues (they did break up), but I don't think there's any reason to conclude that Justin wouldn't have made a good dad, or to compare him to Brad who is a demonstrably bad dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

DP. What about parenting would preclude someone with a few weeks old baby from going and doing something for a few hours in the afternoon? If she's breastfeeding, she can pump before she leaves and even pump while she's there if necessary (they are rich and can make sure there's a private space available for that). I'm sure they have a nanny. Her family is local and they seem close, so I would also actually assume her mom or sister could stay with the baby for something like this. You take a car to the event, walk the red carpet, take photos, maybe stay for a little bit to socialize, then go home.

This is extremely normal. I was in a mom support group when my baby was this age and several of the women in our group would sometimes leave their babies home (with nannies or family) just to get a couple hours break for mental health reasons. I don't see what the issue is at all.

There is no issue. I think posters were mainly confused about the age of the baby. She definitely had not given birth just a couple days before.

I suspect the Instagram birth announcement was actually timed specifically to coincide with the public appearance at the film premiere. Publicists love stuff like that -- the birth announcement catches some headlines and then you follow up with the photos at the premiere, for maximum exposure/effect. If the goal is to get your client's name and face top of mind for people who might be casting a movie or TV show, it's the cascade of positive media hits over a short period of time that helps the most.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read this entire thread. But if the presumption is that there are objections to some wealthy 54 year old man who takes good care of himself and is extremely successful as an actor/director/producer who happens to find a younger woman as a partner, the delusions are strong here.

Where is the 54 year old woman who adds value to Justin Theroux's life? There are lots of very interesting women in their 30s and 40s. What is a 54 year old women bringing here? Maybe with a little serendipity and charm they can click.

But generally, not happening.

I agree with this and also I think he wanted kids, which made a 54 year old woman not an option. It's hard to adopt at that age. Yes it's unfair that men have this option and women don't, but it's biology. It's not something Justin did. We know he and Aniston spent several years trying to have a baby and were not able to. For all we know, the reason their split was so amicable is because Jen decided she could make peace with not having kids and Justin couldn't, and they may have decided to split specifically so they could each pursue their divergent goals -- Jen to focus on her career and friendships and enjoy her life without kids, Justin to look for a partner to have kids with. Yes it's sad in some ways, but it seems like everyone involved is being an adult about it and Jen has even expressed that she is happy for him. All's well that ends well.

People here just want drama. They want this to be a betrayal of Aniston (even though by all accounts their relationship ended amicably), they want Nicole to be a gold digger, they want the baby to have been something she tricked him into, they want them to break up, etc.

Alternatively these are just people trying to have good lives, like anyone else.

I never bought that Jen Aniston and him wanted kids. people with money can have kids. I am not sure why people don’t understand this -.if they didn’t want to adopt they could get donor eggs. It’s not at all hard if you have money.

Nicole herself said this wasn’t planned. You just can’t convince me that he wanted kids and she didn’t baby trap him.

I don’t think it’s unfair or that men have an advantage. We all get the same amount of time to be in our 20s and 30s whether we are male or female. Justin being with a younger woman doesn’t make him any younger. And his plastic surgery just screams that.

He’s going to be an old dad and that sucks. It’s sad for the kid. It’s sad for him and it’s sad for Nicole. But hey, it’s not my life.

Jen addressed the adoption issue saying she wanted a kid with her DNA. Not sure why they didn’t try surrogacy.

Because she didn’t really want a kid and she can’t say that or she will look bad. There’s always a way.

She also said she wanted to be sure she was with a great guy who would be part of a stable family. She wanted a guy who really wanted a kid with her who would be a amazing dad. That was part of her condition for entertaining motherhood, she was not interested in being a single mom by choice.

I think she (accurately!) Knew in her bones that was not Brad or Justin...

Yes. She is wiser than Nicole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

DP. What about parenting would preclude someone with a few weeks old baby from going and doing something for a few hours in the afternoon? If she's breastfeeding, she can pump before she leaves and even pump while she's there if necessary (they are rich and can make sure there's a private space available for that). I'm sure they have a nanny. Her family is local and they seem close, so I would also actually assume her mom or sister could stay with the baby for something like this. You take a car to the event, walk the red carpet, take photos, maybe stay for a little bit to socialize, then go home.

This is extremely normal. I was in a mom support group when my baby was this age and several of the women in our group would sometimes leave their babies home (with nannies or family) just to get a couple hours break for mental health reasons. I don't see what the issue is at all.

There is no issue. I think posters were mainly confused about the age of the baby. She definitely had not given birth just a couple days before.

Sounds like she had the baby 2 weeks before premiere. Clearly work and PR is more important to her than the baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What kind of idiot has a pitbull, let alone with a newborn??

He’s always had pits

And when he got this one, was right after the breakup with Jen and there was no baby on the horizon. He and Jen had a pitt when they were together--that dog disappeared. I assume it was a problem and was sent to a farm or put down.

Jen kept it until it passed away

I don't think so. It was the youngest dog and just suddenly disappeared from the social media of both of them, with no comment. She posted emotional tributes to other dogs who passed away, including one after she and Justin split. He went back to LA for the service. That was not the black and white Pitt, Sophie (I think was her name).

I think someone said it passed. Also after seeing the “ceremony” Justin posted for the white shepard Jen probably thought not a good idea to show it again or discuss. She kept the dog for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shameful it’s more important to look for fame than to look after your own kid. Pretty sure we know how this kid will turn out in 20 years.

Oh come on, let's not shame a working mother. The event was in town. They were probably away from the baby for 2-3 hours. Bet her mom or a sister is there with her. Most of us think the baby was not born in the last week. After several weeks with a newborn, I'd be happy to get dressed up and out of the house for an evening, too. That leaves a whole lot of hours with the baby.

But do I think they're fame hungry? Sure.

It’s not her movie so she wasn’t working

Every red carpet appearance is work for her.

She wasn’t in the movie, no need to attend

You don't seem to grasp how celebrity works.

Or you don’t grasp how parenting works

DP. What about parenting would preclude someone with a few weeks old baby from going and doing something for a few hours in the afternoon? If she's breastfeeding, she can pump before she leaves and even pump while she's there if necessary (they are rich and can make sure there's a private space available for that). I'm sure they have a nanny. Her family is local and they seem close, so I would also actually assume her mom or sister could stay with the baby for something like this. You take a car to the event, walk the red carpet, take photos, maybe stay for a little bit to socialize, then go home.

This is extremely normal. I was in a mom support group when my baby was this age and several of the women in our group would sometimes leave their babies home (with nannies or family) just to get a couple hours break for mental health reasons. I don't see what the issue is at all.

There is no issue. I think posters were mainly confused about the age of the baby. She definitely had not given birth just a couple days before.

I suspect the Instagram birth announcement was actually timed specifically to coincide with the public appearance at the film premiere. Publicists love stuff like that -- the birth announcement catches some headlines and then you follow up with the photos at the premiere, for maximum exposure/effect. If the goal is to get your client's name and face top of mind for people who might be casting a movie or TV show, it's the cascade of positive media hits over a short period of time that helps the most.

And again, PR and work more important than baby.