Woman charged with felony for having a stillbirth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reality is that the baby was 20 weeks old and she delivered at 22 weeks. At 20 weeks it’s considered a miscarriage at 22 weeks. It’s considered stillborn.

What she flushed was only 20 weeks old.

And had 2 weeks of decomposition.

Please show me proof of this assertion.

The facts of this woman having an already-dead fetus (as testified to in a court of law by the forensic doctor who did the autopsy) falling out of her uterus is not enough proof to prove whatever weirdo point you’re trying to make?

Okay.

Why does it matter to you how much decomposition the dead fetus had when it was expelled from this mother’s body? It was dead already regardless.

It’s 100% relevant if someone is claiming that it had 2 weeks worth of decomposition. If it died right before delivery it would have looked like an actual fetus, not a partially decomposed mess as some are claiming. That matters.

They made it up. No news report says that there were no time line's for the hospital visits.

Of course they did. They’ve fabricated an entire narrative with zero evidence.

Pro tip: if you have to make stuff up to prove your point, you don’t have much of a point.

Compassionate tip: don’t be a ghoul.

This woman lost her child.

She's didn't have an compassion when she went about her day and came back with a plunger to unclog her dead toilet baby. She had no compassion for her child at all. Some would say that's gloulish.

What does it mean that she "went about her day"? Please be specific. Timeline and all that.

DP
We don’t have that information yet. That’s just what the article said. But we’ll find out soon enough.

You do know that prosecutors can lie, it’s legal.

Like I said, we don’t have that information yet.

Then come back when you have more information and let the adults talk.

Wtf? I am the very first poster on this thread that said to wait until we have all the facts. Seems like you’re a little confused on who is the adult here.

[Anonymous]

How did they find out about this?

I've never had a miscarriage, but a friend I walked to school with did and I came over one morning and there was a tiny fetus and lots of blood in the toilet. She buried it in a shoe box in her yard. To be honest I don't know what the proper disposal method is. But this made as much sense as anything else at that age (8th grade).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!

I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.

You received medical care. The Catholic hospital this woman sought care at sent her home. Her baby died inside her body. From the report it was two weeks before her body ejected it. It was not the sane experience though you both suffers great losses, it’s not comparable.

You made up that it was a Catholic hospital and you made up she was sent home. So I will say she was offered a d&c twice and refused because she didn't want to pay.

+1
It is amazing the facts that have been literally fabricated out of thin air on this thread. The fetus was 20 weeks but was delivered at 22! The hospital refused her care! The hospital sent her home! The fetus was partially disintegrated! It was a Catholic hospital! The mother needed to be at work and couldn’t miss her shift!

You people are UNREAL.

The thread should be locked and deleted at this point.

Agree. Reporting now.

I just reported it too. This is 100% out of control and pretty shocking how many details they've made up in a few short hours it been posted. Discusting really.

Yes people making up that she "went about her day" as if they actually know what happened or what that means. People making up that she is a monster who abused a corpse. People making up the age of the fetus (as opposed to the stated pregnancy age) when they are not doctors or the woman herself. People making up that the fetus showed signs of injury when the doctor who examined the remains testified that it did not.

[Anonymous]

I am a NP. I don’t know much about the particulars of this case, but in 2002, my long time best friend went into preterm labor at 21+ weeks in Ohio with her very much wanted baby, whom she had tried for a very long time to conceive. She rushed to a nearby small town hospital because there was no NICU in her area. They told her that labor was already too advanced to stop it and that the baby hadn’t reached viability, so they wouldn’t be using any extraordinary measures to try to save the baby and she wouldn’t survive. However, they did deliver the baby. Her lungs weren’t developed enough, so she attempted shallow breaths for a short period and then passed.

Obviously, it’s not tue that you can’t deliver a baby at 22 weeks. Ohio’s recent very strict 6 week abortion ban was in effect when this woman’s water broke. Her baby was still alive at that time, so I’m sure the hospital refused to induce labor because that could be considered an abortion, and the mother’s life wasn’t in immediate danger just yet. The most likely cause of this woman’s legal issues is that she was denied timely medical care because of the hospital’s fear of legal liability, due to the abortion ban. This is a travesty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reality is that the baby was 20 weeks old and she delivered at 22 weeks. At 20 weeks it’s considered a miscarriage at 22 weeks. It’s considered stillborn.

What she flushed was only 20 weeks old.

And had 2 weeks of decomposition.

Please show me proof of this assertion.

The facts of this woman having an already-dead fetus (as testified to in a court of law by the forensic doctor who did the autopsy) falling out of her uterus is not enough proof to prove whatever weirdo point you’re trying to make?

Okay.

Why does it matter to you how much decomposition the dead fetus had when it was expelled from this mother’s body? It was dead already regardless.

It’s 100% relevant if someone is claiming that it had 2 weeks worth of decomposition. If it died right before delivery it would have looked like an actual fetus, not a partially decomposed mess as some are claiming. That matters.

They made it up. No news report says that there were no time line's for the hospital visits.

Of course they did. They’ve fabricated an entire narrative with zero evidence.

Pro tip: if you have to make stuff up to prove your point, you don’t have much of a point.

Compassionate tip: don’t be a ghoul.

This woman lost her child.

She's didn't have an compassion when she went about her day and came back with a plunger to unclog her dead toilet baby. She had no compassion for her child at all. Some would say that's gloulish.

What does it mean that she "went about her day"? Please be specific. Timeline and all that.

DP
We don’t have that information yet. That’s just what the article said. But we’ll find out soon enough.

You do know that prosecutors can lie, it’s legal.

Like I said, we don’t have that information yet.

Totally dystopian answer.

You are a parrot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!

I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.

You received medical care. The Catholic hospital this woman sought care at sent her home. Her baby died inside her body. From the report it was two weeks before her body ejected it. It was not the sane experience though you both suffers great losses, it’s not comparable.

You made up that it was a Catholic hospital and you made up she was sent home. So I will say she was offered a d&c twice and refused because she didn't want to pay.

+1
It is amazing the facts that have been literally fabricated out of thin air on this thread. The fetus was 20 weeks but was delivered at 22! The hospital refused her care! The hospital sent her home! The fetus was partially disintegrated! It was a Catholic hospital! The mother needed to be at work and couldn’t miss her shift!

You people are UNREAL.

The thread should be locked and deleted at this point.

Agree. Reporting now.

I just reported it too. This is 100% out of control and pretty shocking how many details they've made up in a few short hours it been posted. Discusting really.

Yes people making up that she "went about her day" as if they actually know what happened or what that means. People making up that she is a monster who abused a corpse. People making up the age of the fetus (as opposed to the stated pregnancy age) when they are not doctors or the woman herself. People making up that the fetus showed signs of injury when the doctor who examined the remains testified that it did not.

People making up that she was traumatized and therefore couldn’t bring herself to get the fetus out of the toilet. People making up that the fetus was partially disintegrated. People making up that a Catholic hospital did absolutely nothing for her and turned her away.
I mean the list goes on and on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reality is that the baby was 20 weeks old and she delivered at 22 weeks. At 20 weeks it’s considered a miscarriage at 22 weeks. It’s considered stillborn.

What she flushed was only 20 weeks old.

And had 2 weeks of decomposition.

Please show me proof of this assertion.

The facts of this woman having an already-dead fetus (as testified to in a court of law by the forensic doctor who did the autopsy) falling out of her uterus is not enough proof to prove whatever weirdo point you’re trying to make?

Okay.

Why does it matter to you how much decomposition the dead fetus had when it was expelled from this mother’s body? It was dead already regardless.

It’s 100% relevant if someone is claiming that it had 2 weeks worth of decomposition. If it died right before delivery it would have looked like an actual fetus, not a partially decomposed mess as some are claiming. That matters.

They made it up. No news report says that there were no time line's for the hospital visits.

Of course they did. They’ve fabricated an entire narrative with zero evidence.

Pro tip: if you have to make stuff up to prove your point, you don’t have much of a point.

Compassionate tip: don’t be a ghoul.

This woman lost her child.

She's didn't have an compassion when she went about her day and came back with a plunger to unclog her dead toilet baby. She had no compassion for her child at all. Some would say that's gloulish.

What does it mean that she "went about her day"? Please be specific. Timeline and all that.

DP
We don’t have that information yet. That’s just what the article said. But we’ll find out soon enough.

You do know that prosecutors can lie, it’s legal.

Like I said, we don’t have that information yet.

Then come back when you have more information and let the adults talk.

Wtf? I am the very first poster on this thread that said to wait until we have all the facts. Seems like you’re a little confused on who is the adult here.

Sorry OP… you don’t own this thread just because you started it. And you can’t stop the thread because you didn’t like what direction it went in.

The whole case is a travesty.

The men in Ohio are freaking out because women put abortion on the ballot and guess what we won and now they’re pissed.

Sorry, not sorry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a NP. I don’t know much about the particulars of this case, but in 2002, my long time best friend went into preterm labor at 21+ weeks in Ohio with her very much wanted baby, whom she had tried for a very long time to conceive. She rushed to a nearby small town hospital because there was no NICU in her area. They told her that labor was already too advanced to stop it and that the baby hadn’t reached viability, so they wouldn’t be using any extraordinary measures to try to save the baby and she wouldn’t survive. However, they did deliver the baby. Her lungs weren’t developed enough, so she attempted shallow breaths for a short period and then passed.

Obviously, it’s not tue that you can’t deliver a baby at 22 weeks. Ohio’s recent very strict 6 week abortion ban was in effect when this woman’s water broke. Her baby was still alive at that time, so I’m sure the hospital refused to induce labor because that could be considered an abortion, and the mother’s life wasn’t in immediate danger just yet. The most likely cause of this woman’s legal issues is that she was denied timely medical care because of the hospital’s fear of legal liability, due to the abortion ban. This is a travesty.

Why would the abortion ban stop them from giving medical care to a woman experiencing a miscarriage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!

I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.

You received medical care. The Catholic hospital this woman sought care at sent her home. Her baby died inside her body. From the report it was two weeks before her body ejected it. It was not the sane experience though you both suffers great losses, it’s not comparable.

You made up that it was a Catholic hospital and you made up she was sent home. So I will say she was offered a d&c twice and refused because she didn't want to pay.

+1
It is amazing the facts that have been literally fabricated out of thin air on this thread. The fetus was 20 weeks but was delivered at 22! The hospital refused her care! The hospital sent her home! The fetus was partially disintegrated! It was a Catholic hospital! The mother needed to be at work and couldn’t miss her shift!

You people are UNREAL.

The thread should be locked and deleted at this point.

Agree. Reporting now.

I just reported it too. This is 100% out of control and pretty shocking how many details they've made up in a few short hours it been posted. Discusting really.

Yes people making up that she "went about her day" as if they actually know what happened or what that means. People making up that she is a monster who abused a corpse. People making up the age of the fetus (as opposed to the stated pregnancy age) when they are not doctors or the woman herself. People making up that the fetus showed signs of injury when the doctor who examined the remains testified that it did not.

People making up that she was traumatized and therefore couldn’t bring herself to get the fetus out of the toilet. People making up that the fetus was partially disintegrated. People making up that a Catholic hospital did absolutely nothing for her and turned her away.
I mean the list goes on and on.

And the prosecution made up that it was 22 weeks, and that she went on her day.

The discussion on this thread are about the general experience of women who have had miscarriages at that stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reality is that the baby was 20 weeks old and she delivered at 22 weeks. At 20 weeks it’s considered a miscarriage at 22 weeks. It’s considered stillborn.

What she flushed was only 20 weeks old.

And had 2 weeks of decomposition.

Please show me proof of this assertion.

The facts of this woman having an already-dead fetus (as testified to in a court of law by the forensic doctor who did the autopsy) falling out of her uterus is not enough proof to prove whatever weirdo point you’re trying to make?

Okay.

Why does it matter to you how much decomposition the dead fetus had when it was expelled from this mother’s body? It was dead already regardless.

It’s 100% relevant if someone is claiming that it had 2 weeks worth of decomposition. If it died right before delivery it would have looked like an actual fetus, not a partially decomposed mess as some are claiming. That matters.

They made it up. No news report says that there were no time line's for the hospital visits.

Of course they did. They’ve fabricated an entire narrative with zero evidence.

Pro tip: if you have to make stuff up to prove your point, you don’t have much of a point.

Compassionate tip: don’t be a ghoul.

This woman lost her child.

She's didn't have an compassion when she went about her day and came back with a plunger to unclog her dead toilet baby. She had no compassion for her child at all. Some would say that's gloulish.

What does it mean that she "went about her day"? Please be specific. Timeline and all that.

DP
We don’t have that information yet. That’s just what the article said. But we’ll find out soon enough.

You do know that prosecutors can lie, it’s legal.

Like I said, we don’t have that information yet.

Then come back when you have more information and let the adults talk.

Wtf? I am the very first poster on this thread that said to wait until we have all the facts. Seems like you’re a little confused on who is the adult here.

Sorry OP… you don’t own this thread just because you started it. And you can’t stop the thread because you didn’t like what direction it went in.

The whole case is a travesty.

The men in Ohio are freaking out because women put abortion on the ballot and guess what we won and now they’re pissed.

Sorry, not sorry!

I am not OP. And I stand by my statement that we don’t have all the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a NP. I don’t know much about the particulars of this case, but in 2002, my long time best friend went into preterm labor at 21+ weeks in Ohio with her very much wanted baby, whom she had tried for a very long time to conceive. She rushed to a nearby small town hospital because there was no NICU in her area. They told her that labor was already too advanced to stop it and that the baby hadn’t reached viability, so they wouldn’t be using any extraordinary measures to try to save the baby and she wouldn’t survive. However, they did deliver the baby. Her lungs weren’t developed enough, so she attempted shallow breaths for a short period and then passed.

Obviously, it’s not tue that you can’t deliver a baby at 22 weeks. Ohio’s recent very strict 6 week abortion ban was in effect when this woman’s water broke. Her baby was still alive at that time, so I’m sure the hospital refused to induce labor because that could be considered an abortion, and the mother’s life wasn’t in immediate danger just yet. The most likely cause of this woman’s legal issues is that she was denied timely medical care because of the hospital’s fear of legal liability, due to the abortion ban. This is a travesty.

Why would the abortion ban stop them from giving medical care to a woman experiencing a miscarriage?

Ohio hospitals are afraid of delivering a baby that is non-viable, because they might be sued by crazy MAGA prosecutors for an abortion.

The hospital also might’ve believed that the baby was less than 20 weeks which would mean they would send her home to have a miscarriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The reality is that the baby was 20 weeks old and she delivered at 22 weeks. At 20 weeks it’s considered a miscarriage at 22 weeks. It’s considered stillborn.

What she flushed was only 20 weeks old.

And had 2 weeks of decomposition.

Please show me proof of this assertion.

The facts of this woman having an already-dead fetus (as testified to in a court of law by the forensic doctor who did the autopsy) falling out of her uterus is not enough proof to prove whatever weirdo point you’re trying to make?

Okay.

Why does it matter to you how much decomposition the dead fetus had when it was expelled from this mother’s body? It was dead already regardless.

It’s 100% relevant if someone is claiming that it had 2 weeks worth of decomposition. If it died right before delivery it would have looked like an actual fetus, not a partially decomposed mess as some are claiming. That matters.

They made it up. No news report says that there were no time line's for the hospital visits.

Of course they did. They’ve fabricated an entire narrative with zero evidence.

Pro tip: if you have to make stuff up to prove your point, you don’t have much of a point.

Compassionate tip: don’t be a ghoul.

This woman lost her child.

She's didn't have an compassion when she went about her day and came back with a plunger to unclog her dead toilet baby. She had no compassion for her child at all. Some would say that's gloulish.

What does it mean that she "went about her day"? Please be specific. Timeline and all that.

DP
We don’t have that information yet. That’s just what the article said. But we’ll find out soon enough.

You do know that prosecutors can lie, it’s legal.

Like I said, we don’t have that information yet.

Then come back when you have more information and let the adults talk.

Wtf? I am the very first poster on this thread that said to wait until we have all the facts. Seems like you’re a little confused on who is the adult here.

Sorry OP… you don’t own this thread just because you started it. And you can’t stop the thread because you didn’t like what direction it went in.

The whole case is a travesty.

The men in Ohio are freaking out because women put abortion on the ballot and guess what we won and now they’re pissed.

Sorry, not sorry!

I am not OP. And I stand by my statement that we don’t have all the facts.

Then go away and let us discuss this like adults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!

I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.

You received medical care. The Catholic hospital this woman sought care at sent her home. Her baby died inside her body. From the report it was two weeks before her body ejected it. It was not the sane experience though you both suffers great losses, it’s not comparable.

You made up that it was a Catholic hospital and you made up she was sent home. So I will say she was offered a d&c twice and refused because she didn't want to pay.

+1
It is amazing the facts that have been literally fabricated out of thin air on this thread. The fetus was 20 weeks but was delivered at 22! The hospital refused her care! The hospital sent her home! The fetus was partially disintegrated! It was a Catholic hospital! The mother needed to be at work and couldn’t miss her shift!

You people are UNREAL.

The thread should be locked and deleted at this point.

Agree. Reporting now.

I just reported it too. This is 100% out of control and pretty shocking how many details they've made up in a few short hours it been posted. Discusting really.

Yes people making up that she "went about her day" as if they actually know what happened or what that means. People making up that she is a monster who abused a corpse. People making up the age of the fetus (as opposed to the stated pregnancy age) when they are not doctors or the woman herself. People making up that the fetus showed signs of injury when the doctor who examined the remains testified that it did not.

People making up that she was traumatized and therefore couldn’t bring herself to get the fetus out of the toilet. People making up that the fetus was partially disintegrated. People making up that a Catholic hospital did absolutely nothing for her and turned her away.
I mean the list goes on and on.

Some one made up it was a Catholic hospital, that she was turned away, that they kicked her out without treatment, also said it was because she was black and poor and that's why she was treated poorly. All of this is total bs.

They don't acknowledge that she went about her day and tried to flush a dead body. These are facts. Someone in her own household called 911 on her these are facts they don't awknowlege.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a NP. I don’t know much about the particulars of this case, but in 2002, my long time best friend went into preterm labor at 21+ weeks in Ohio with her very much wanted baby, whom she had tried for a very long time to conceive. She rushed to a nearby small town hospital because there was no NICU in her area. They told her that labor was already too advanced to stop it and that the baby hadn’t reached viability, so they wouldn’t be using any extraordinary measures to try to save the baby and she wouldn’t survive. However, they did deliver the baby. Her lungs weren’t developed enough, so she attempted shallow breaths for a short period and then passed.

Obviously, it’s not tue that you can’t deliver a baby at 22 weeks. Ohio’s recent very strict 6 week abortion ban was in effect when this woman’s water broke. Her baby was still alive at that time, so I’m sure the hospital refused to induce labor because that could be considered an abortion, and the mother’s life wasn’t in immediate danger just yet. The most likely cause of this woman’s legal issues is that she was denied timely medical care because of the hospital’s fear of legal liability, due to the abortion ban. This is a travesty.

Why would the abortion ban stop them from giving medical care to a woman experiencing a miscarriage?

It makes no sense but that’s what anti-choice men and women want to do. They don’t care about dangers to the woman’s life.

[Anonymous]

This woman likely miscarried on the toilet. How did anyone find out about this? This woman was probably in shock and punishing her is outrageous. Was she reported by a plumber or did she call 911?