LCPS sexual assualt - who is held accountable?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham on Fox doing a big special on this story tonight. 10 pm


Of course she is FOX hahaha


Glad one news program will cover this.


Laura Ingradevil isn’t a “news program” FFS.

No wonder millions of idiots believe GOP crazy lies. They think some crackpot’s opinion is fact.


Yep, it is a news program. You might be annoyed that she's covering a story you would rather bury, but I'm glad she's standing up for the young women who were victimized.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why ANYONE would want that job is beyond me. It pays $22k/year to out up with all those looney constituents? Hard pass.


These looney constituents...you mean the ones who want their children to not be assaulted at school?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused. Where does it say the suspect was in a dress?


The dad alleges the perp sometimes wears a skirt. I am skeptical of this claim.


+1 - I find it a little too convenient that this exact right wing scenario played out at this exact time.


Denial is a powerful thing.

Looks like it wasn't a right wing scenario after all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham on Fox doing a big special on this story tonight. 10 pm


Of course she is FOX hahaha


Glad one news program will cover this.


+1

We would not even know about this were it not for conservative media. WAPO has still hardly touched it and has not mentioned that he was the poster child for "domestic terrorist."


I first heard the story here. It is sad that our local major news sources (newspaper and TV) are not covering it. It is like these things do not exist, which consequently gives off the vibe of a covering up. It alzo seems to be a way for them to stir up who they regard as crazies. That is, let Fox cover it first so the story can be about the crazies and not the issue (here, sexual crimes) they are highlighting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham on Fox doing a big special on this story tonight. 10 pm


Of course she is FOX hahaha


Glad one news program will cover this.


Laura Ingradevil isn’t a “news program” FFS.

No wonder millions of idiots believe GOP crazy lies. They think some crackpot’s opinion is fact.


Yep, it is a news program. You might be annoyed that she's covering a story you would rather bury, but I'm glad she's standing up for the young women who were victimized.


It’s actually not. The show is categorized as opinion-based commentary because legally they’re not held to the same standard of facts and accuracy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham on Fox doing a big special on this story tonight. 10 pm


Of course she is FOX hahaha


Glad one news program will cover this.


Laura Ingradevil isn’t a “news program” FFS.

No wonder millions of idiots believe GOP crazy lies. They think some crackpot’s opinion is fact.


Yep, it is a news program. You might be annoyed that she's covering a story you would rather bury, but I'm glad she's standing up for the young women who were victimized.


No, it’s an OPINION-based talk show. Not “news”.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused. Where does it say the suspect was in a dress?


The dad alleges the perp sometimes wears a skirt. I am skeptical of this claim.


+1 - I find it a little too convenient that this exact right wing scenario played out at this exact time.


Denial is a powerful thing.

Looks like it wasn't a right wing scenario after all.


Might want to check those darn facts again. Yeah right wing crazies are not helping this case at all. Maybe do more homework on FACTS.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:We would not even know about this were it not for conservative media. WAPO has still hardly touched it and has not mentioned that he was the poster child for "domestic terrorist."


The Washington Post had one of the most detailed reports on the assaults:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/loudoun-schools-sex-assault-allegations/2021/10/13/02d3f144-2c61-11ec-8ef6-3ca8fe943a92_story.html
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We would not even know about this were it not for conservative media. WAPO has still hardly touched it and has not mentioned that he was the poster child for "domestic terrorist."


The Washington Post had one of the most detailed reports on the assaults:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/loudoun-schools-sex-assault-allegations/2021/10/13/02d3f144-2c61-11ec-8ef6-3ca8fe943a92_story.html


C’mon. You know they were pushed into it after the Daily Wire story turned into the Daily Mail story turned into the WTOP story. WaPo were not the leaders on this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:ICYMI

https://www.gofundme.com/f/safe-schools-legal-fund


I thought the victim's dad already pled out (pled guilty?) to the charge(s) stemming from his interaction at the school and/or school board meeting? so what's the "legal fund" for?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why ANYONE would want that job is beyond me. It pays $22k/year to out up with all those looney constituents? Hard pass.


Power. And it's the foundation of a lot of status quo establishment budding politicians. And it's typically an easy gig because less than a handful of busybodies typically even pay attention. That has changed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laura Ingraham on Fox doing a big special on this story tonight. 10 pm


Of course she is FOX hahaha


Glad one news program will cover this.


Laura Ingradevil isn’t a “news program” FFS.

No wonder millions of idiots believe GOP crazy lies. They think some crackpot’s opinion is fact.


Yep, it is a news program. You might be annoyed that she's covering a story you would rather bury, but I'm glad she's standing up for the young women who were victimized.


Laura Ingraham doesn't even classify her show as a news program, but you do, lol.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why ANYONE would want that job is beyond me. It pays $22k/year to out up with all those looney constituents? Hard pass.


Power. And it's the foundation of a lot of status quo establishment budding politicians. And it's typically an easy gig because less than a handful of busybodies typically even pay attention. That has changed.


That is key, right there. COVID really opened up many pairs of parents’ eyes to what is actually going on in public schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why ANYONE would want that job is beyond me. It pays $22k/year to out up with all those looney constituents? Hard pass.


Power. And it's the foundation of a lot of status quo establishment budding politicians. And it's typically an easy gig because less than a handful of busybodies typically even pay attention. That has changed.


That is key, right there. COVID really opened up many pairs of parents’ eyes to what is actually going on in public schools.


...and exposed how deeply unimpressive and scummy the creeps who run the average school system are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm confused. Where does it say the suspect was in a dress?


The dad alleges the perp sometimes wears a skirt. I am skeptical of this claim.


+1 - I find it a little too convenient that this exact right wing scenario played out at this exact time.


Denial is a powerful thing.

Looks like it wasn't a right wing scenario after all.


What was convenient was that the Superintendent happened to lie in response to a question about a sexual assault by a skirt wearing girl-boy in the girls' bathroom on the same night parents were fighting to prevent the school district from adopting unsafe bathroom policies that puts girls in danger.

Parents would have been LIVID and the far left couldn't have pushed through their dangerous policy had the superintendent acknowledged the sexual assault in the bathroom.

"Superintendent Scott Ziegler apologized for saying during a June event that the Virginia district had no record of assaults taking place in its bathrooms. His comments came amid debate about policy changes related to self-identified transgender students. Ziegler said Friday that he misunderstood the question when he made the comment."


He didn't misunderstand the question. He lied and now needs to cover his a$$.

He needs to be fired and ALL CRT supporters and left winger board members need to be removed.
Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Go to: