How did that jerk that was stalking Lois Lerner on private property get away with doing that?!! Have

[Anonymous]

She was going to people's homes to get away from him. Terrible. He is a bully.

[jsteele]

You may not have noticed, but posts on DCUM have a "body" as well as a "subject". You might consider using both of them. Then, we might actually know what you are talking about.

[Anonymous]

Lerner's neighbor said 'I don't want her in my house'. I need to buy that man a beer!!

[Anonymous]

Kind of funny question since Lerner used her government office to stalk political opponents. That's a crime for which she pleaded the fifth and destroyed evidence to cover up (well we don't really know any of that but that's why the reporter is trying to figure out). Now as a general rule I don't like the media but since its their job to investigate our government so it doesn't become abusive, corrupt or illegitimate I have no beef with this guys activities.

Just as I had no beef with them going after other public figures like Sarah Palin. Funny no one complained about her being stalked, not even her and as far as I know she never tried to break into a neighbors house to get away.

All in all Lerner is pretty loathsome and I gotta wonder if OP is a relative or perhaps Lerner herself??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kind of funny question since Lerner used her government office to stalk political opponents. That's a crime for which she pleaded the fifth and destroyed evidence to cover up (well we don't really know any of that but that's why the reporter is trying to figure out). Now as a general rule I don't like the media but since its their job to investigate our government so it doesn't become abusive, corrupt or illegitimate I have no beef with this guys activities.

Just as I had no beef with them going after other public figures like Sarah Palin. Funny no one complained about her being stalked, not even her and as far as I know she never tried to break into a neighbors house to get away.

All in all Lerner is pretty loathsome and I gotta wonder if OP is a relative or perhaps Lerner herself??

As a general rule, you like anyone who agrees with you.

[Anonymous]

I don't like what Lerner did--which was more egregious than what the stalker did to her. That said, he was out of line. Two wrongs don't make a right.

[Anonymous]

Boo Hoo. The hunter becomes the hunted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kind of funny question since Lerner used her government office to stalk political opponents. That's a crime for which she pleaded the fifth and destroyed evidence to cover up (well we don't really know any of that but that's why the reporter is trying to figure out). Now as a general rule I don't like the media but since its their job to investigate our government so it doesn't become abusive, corrupt or illegitimate I have no beef with this guys activities.

Just as I had no beef with them going after other public figures like Sarah Palin. Funny no one complained about her being stalked, not even her and as far as I know she never tried to break into a neighbors house to get away.

All in all Lerner is pretty loathsome and I gotta wonder if OP is a relative or perhaps Lerner herself??

Ha. Nope not Lerner or a relative and I don't have anything to do with the situation except I didn't like the tactics of that guy. He followed her onto private property and was bullying her. No doubt about that. Conservatives seem to bully more I have noticed and apparently from these replies it is condoned by many of you. Screw that neighbor whether he likes her or not. One should always be a gentleman.

[Anonymous]

Ha. Nope not Lerner or a relative and I don't have anything to do with the situation except I didn't like the tactics of that guy. He followed her onto private property and was bullying her. No doubt about that. Conservatives seem to bully more I have noticed and apparently from these replies it is condoned by many of you. Screw that neighbor whether he likes her or not. One should always be a gentleman.

I don't like the reporter's actions, but didn't Lois Lerner go on private property and demand entry?

[Anonymous]

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

[Anonymous]

Lois Lerner belongs in a prison cell for her crimes - i.e, the actions which "may" have "incriminated" her - the ones she refused to testify about. Remember those?

Sorry, she got off Scott free for what she did. If an investigative journalist made her squirm a little, then good.

Hope he isn't the last.

OP - I do not think you know what stalking means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

Both of you seem to need a deep probing IRS audit!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

I dint think any liberal on this board has defended this event.

However conssrvatives here on DCUM seem positively gleeful whenever they get to use bullying or threat of violence to get their way. Gleeful here, gleeful about the Bundy standoff. Gleeful when you get to attack protesters at political events. So excited about it all. You don't want laws. You want your way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

I dint think any liberal on this board has defended this event.

However conssrvatives here on DCUM seem positively gleeful whenever they get to use bullying or threat of violence to get their way. Gleeful here, gleeful about the Bundy standoff. Gleeful when you get to attack protesters at political events. So excited about it all. You don't want laws. You want your way.

No, you have gotten conservatives confused with the “Occupy” protesters. This describes them to a tee.