How did that jerk that was stalking Lois Lerner on private property get away with doing that?!! Have

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

I dint think any liberal on this board has defended this event.

However conssrvatives here on DCUM seem positively gleeful whenever they get to use bullying or threat of violence to get their way. Gleeful here, gleeful about the Bundy standoff. Gleeful when you get to attack protesters at political events. So excited about it all. You don't want laws. You want your way.

No, you have gotten conservatives confused with the “Occupy” protesters. This describes them to a tee.

Can you show me an example of "Occupy" protesters acting "gleeful" in regard to the Bandy standoff?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/21/seiu-protesters-descend-on-bank-execs-home-terrifying-his-son/

Liberals don't bully? The guy's kid was home alone.

THANK YOU! I was about to look up the same incident.

Which is also why LL didn't go to her home, she didn't want it on camera. Understandable, but suck it LL.

I dint think any liberal on this board has defended this event.

However conssrvatives here on DCUM seem positively gleeful whenever they get to use bullying or threat of violence to get their way. Gleeful here, gleeful about the Bundy standoff. Gleeful when you get to attack protesters at political events. So excited about it all. You don't want laws. You want your way.

No, you have gotten conservatives confused with the “Occupy” protesters. This describes them to a tee.

Sorry - should have bolded the relevant parts:
positively gleeful whenever they get to use bullying or threat of violence to get their way.
You don't want laws. You want your way.

Can you show me an example of "Occupy" protesters acting "gleeful" in regard to the Bandy standoff?

[Anonymous]

I am talking about conservatives right here on DCUM. Gleeful.

[Anonymous]

Bundy? I don't even recall which flyover state that was. OWS was in most major US cities - including DC.

And youth leaders of OWS were arrested with bomb-making materials.

[Anonymous]

OWS = terrorists:

http://nypost.com/2012/12/31/greenwich-village-couple-busted-with-cache-of-weapons-bombmaking-explosives-sources/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bundy? I don't even recall which flyover state that was. OWS was in most major US cities - including DC.

And youth leaders of OWS were arrested with bomb-making materials.

Wow, they were upgraded to "youth leaders"! OK, whatever you are smoking, pass it around.

The reality was they were a group of people angry that OWS was nonviolent and tried to use the movement as cover for their activities. And OWS condemned their actions.

The operation outlined Tuesday in federal court papers described a poorly financed operation by inexperienced players who at times joked about their lack of terror savvy but sought to use the cover of the Occupy campaign in Cleveland to strike a violent blow against U.S. corporate properties and interests.From the earliest point in a seven-month undercover inquiry starting in October, an FBI informant said the group of suspects expressed "displeasure at the (Occupy) crowd's unwillingness to act violently.''

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-05-01/bridge-bomb-plot/54661638/1

In contrast, DCUM conservatives had this to say about the Bundy standoff: "The whole thing was like a movie where the good guys won." I believe this was followed with lots of talk about how the government had to run home with its tail between its legs.

Unlike here, on DCUM, where

[Anonymous]

When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Not saying they did - they just WANTED their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Well, they did take the liberty of shitting where they ate, and walked, and drove. Not that everybody wants it that way, but they sure did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Well, they did take the liberty of shitting where they ate, and walked, and drove. Not that everybody wants it that way, but they sure did.

And, don’t forget then dumping the urine and feces in public areas and banks. Don’t forget the sexual assaults that happened as part of the protests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Not saying they did - they just WANTED their way.

It would be ironic if you criticized them for exercising their right to speech on this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Well, they did take the liberty of shitting where they ate, and walked, and drove. Not that everybody wants it that way, but they sure did.

They didn't shoot and kill cops. I suppose that's a win for Team Bundy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Not saying they did - they just WANTED their way.

It would be ironic if you criticized them for exercising their right to speech on this thread.

I have no problem with their right to speech. However, their “right" to destroy public property, defecate in public places, and commit crimes such as rape during the protests will never be condoned by me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Not saying they did - they just WANTED their way.

It would be ironic if you criticized them for exercising their right to speech on this thread.

I have no problem with their right to speech. However, their “right" to destroy public property, defecate in public places, and commit crimes such as rape during the protests will never be condoned by me.

I don't believe anyone from OWS was raping. But hey if they have to take the rap for that then you have two dead cops in Vegas and a bystander to atone for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When did the Occupy protesters ever get their way?

Not saying they did - they just WANTED their way.

It would be ironic if you criticized them for exercising their right to speech on this thread.

I have no problem with their right to speech. However, their “right" to destroy public property, defecate in public places, and commit crimes such as rape during the protests will never be condoned by me.

I don't believe anyone from OWS was raping. But hey if they have to take the rap for that then you have two dead cops in Vegas and a bystander to atone for.

Just ONE of the numerous stories that comes up when you google rape and occupy: http://abcnews.go.com/US/sexual-assaults-occupy-wall-street-camps/story?id=14873014

This comes just as Tonye Iketubosin, 26, was arrested late Tuesday for allegedly sexually assaulting two women, both inside tents in New York City's Zuccotti Park.

The first alleged attack occurred Oct. 24 after Iketubosin helped a 17-year-old girl to set up her tent. After he refused to leave, he allegedly groped the girl.

The second alleged assault occurred Oct. 29 after an 18-year-old woman from Massachusetts agreed to let Iketubosin sleep in her tent. She said she awoke to find him pulling off her pants and that he proceeded to rape her.

The problem of women being hassled, or worse, isn't unique to New York City.

And, as for the Las Vegas shooting... get the story straight.

Authorities say Miller and his wife, Amanda, 22, acted alone in the shootings and they are not seeking additional suspects. McMahill added that officers are still looking for a motive and the couple believed that law enforcement was the "oppressor."

The couple had visited Cliven Bundy's ranch during an armed standoff earlier this year with federal authorities about a land dispute, Bundy's son said Monday. Ammon Bundy told The Associated Press that they were asked to leave his father's ranch after being there for a few days this spring.

He said that while details were still sketchy, the Millers' conduct was the problem. He called the couple "very radical" and said they did not "align themselves" with the protest's main issues.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/06/09/las-vegas-shooting-officers-dead-possible-white-supremacists/

So, while you might like to link this to Bundy, the behavior of these criminals has been condemned by any people related to the Bundy protest.