“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well it looks like Youngkin is looking at a 15 week ban. Before it gets anywhere you know it will dwindle even further to appeal to his voters.

Did Youngkin and family move to Richmond?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Not surprising, I had a pharmacist in Georgia refuse to fill a birth control prescription a few years ago.

Not sure why they want to prevent men from having sex, but they seem to.

[Anonymous]

Abortion rates in the USA have actually been falling year after year since Roe V Wade in 1973 because, contrary to the myth, this choice really is a last resort for the women who choose it-

- https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2019/09/us-abortion-rate-continues-drop-once-again-state-abortion-restrictions-are-not-main

If the " Pro-Lifers" want to get that number down even lower because they Really, really can't stand to see a single Embryo aborted then WHY don't they put their Energy into advocating for policies that are PROVEN in other 1st World countries drastically decrease unwanted Pregnancy:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7971545/

More Sex Ed in schools AND more readily available and cheaper Birth Control

Countries like the Netherlands-where , through a massive campaign of Body Autonomy, Self respect and Sex Ed starting in Elementary school:
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/08/the-benefits-of-starting-sex-ed-at-age-4/568225/

And Free Birth Control without a compulsory vaginal exam, they have been able to achieve the lowest Abortion rate, the lowest Teen pregnancy rate and the lowest STD rate among teens in the World despite the fact that Abortion is not only legal in their country BUT its FREE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Finally.
It only took more than a month.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Finally.
It only took more than a month.

Yes, let's have the Police State clamp down on the 1st Amendment to protect the feelings of illegitimate rogue justices. Meanwhile we don't do jack shit about protecting Americans from the REAL threats: children *actually* being shot to pieces in their elementary schools, shoppers *actually* being gunned down in grocery stores and shopping malls, people of faith *actually* slaughtered in their synagogues and churches...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The group Ruth Sent Us is planning on protesting in front of Kavanaugh's home - tonight.

Merrick Garland should come out and say anyone protesting will be arrested and cite the federal law prohibiting the protesting they have been condoning thus far.
Biden should come out and condemn it - unlike Psaki who said they fully support people peacefully protesting (in violation of federal law).

And, anyone protesting should be arrested on the spot and prosecuted.

Finally.
It only took more than a month.

Yes, let's have the Police State clamp down on the 1st Amendment to protect the feelings of illegitimate rogue justices. Meanwhile we don't do jack shit about protecting Americans from the REAL threats: children *actually* being shot to pieces in their elementary schools, shoppers *actually* being gunned down in grocery stores and shopping malls, people of faith *actually* slaughtered in their synagogues and churches...

It’s almost as if Republicans are…fascists…

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Wonder if he’s ever going to publicly identify the leaker. Almost seems certain that it was someone in Alito or Thomas’s camp, and at their explicit instruction. Since the Republicans believed that it was a matter of utmost importance and that person should be fired and sent to jail, I wonder when we’re going to get around to outing them.

[Anonymous]

Does anybody still think the leak was from the liberals? How’s that “investigation” coming along?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wonder if he’s ever going to publicly identify the leaker. Almost seems certain that it was someone in Alito or Thomas’s camp, and at their explicit instruction. Since the Republicans believed that it was a matter of utmost importance and that person should be fired and sent to jail, I wonder when we’re going to get around to outing them.

Ginny Thomas!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wonder if he’s ever going to publicly identify the leaker. Almost seems certain that it was someone in Alito or Thomas’s camp, and at their explicit instruction. Since the Republicans believed that it was a matter of utmost importance and that person should be fired and sent to jail, I wonder when we’re going to get around to outing them.

Ginny Thomas!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This is some kind of feeble attempt of rehabbing his image. It makes absolutely no sense. He went ahead and decided against Rowe, as he intended all along. It was said at the beginning of the thread that the decision was leaked by a Republican to force them to all fall in line with the corrupt decision. Acting like he was helpless. History is going to be brutal on this "Chief Justice."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is some kind of feeble attempt of rehabbing his image. It makes absolutely no sense. He went ahead and decided against Rowe, as he intended all along. It was said at the beginning of the thread that the decision was leaked by a Republican to force them to all fall in line with the corrupt decision. Acting like he was helpless. History is going to be brutal on this "Chief Justice."

It’s not his court anymore. It’s Alito’s.

And to the other pp’s point: where is the name of the leaker? When they thought it was a liberal’s work, the leak was the worst atrocity ever committed. Now that they know it was one of their own it’s shhhhh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Such a pathetic little weasel.