Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html

I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.

WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.

His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.

He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.

Yes. It’s a birthday card. Most people, including “the Donald”, sign cards with just their first name. It’s not a contract or an EO. And Trump and Epstein were very close for a very long time.

[Anonymous]

The strategically placed signature is a nice touch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The strategically placed signature is a nice touch.

I doubt it was accidental!

[Anonymous]

WH claiming it's fake. Ridiculous. Ghislaine Maxwell knows the truth but she's clearly not telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WH claiming it's fake. Ridiculous. Ghislaine Maxwell knows the truth but she's clearly not telling.

Ha! They are so scared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ Hot off the press about birthday letter!

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/epstein-birthday-book-congress-9d79ab34?st=aPJUJs

Good job, WSJ! Wonder how Trump's lawsuit against the WSJ for defamation is going.

Trump has denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it “a fake thing.” He also filed a lawsuit against the Journal’s reporters, Journal publisher Dow Jones, parent company News Corp and executives, alleging defamation and saying the letter was “nonexistent.” A Dow Jones spokeswoman said, “We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html

I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.

WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.

His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.

He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.

Lots of samples just like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html

I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.

WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.

His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.

He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.

Yes. It’s a birthday card. Most people, including “the Donald”, sign cards with just their first name. It’s not a contract or an EO. And Trump and Epstein were very close for a very long time.

Apparently there is a "Donald" signature on letter of d sent to Hillary congratulating her when she was elected to the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WH claiming it's fake. Ridiculous. Ghislaine Maxwell knows the truth but she's clearly not telling.

Absurd. I wish dems would go full csi and find DNA on it, match it to his niece. (I know that’s a ridiculous idea, folks, so no need to point it out.)

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The strategically placed signature is a nice touch.

You are impressed with the pedophiles now ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html

I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.

WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.

His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.

He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.

Yes. It’s a birthday card. Most people, including “the Donald”, sign cards with just their first name. It’s not a contract or an EO. And Trump and Epstein were very close for a very long time.

Apparently there is a "Donald" signature on letter of d sent to Hillary congratulating her when she was elected to the Senate.

And to George Conway 😆 and Keith Olbermann 😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html

I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.

WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.

His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.

He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.

Lots of samples just like that.

No need to even waste time on this.

It is obviously real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WH claiming it's fake. Ridiculous. Ghislaine Maxwell knows the truth but she's clearly not telling.

So they are saying the whole birthday book is fake, or that Epsteins estate created it now to embarrass trump or what exactly is fake?

[Anonymous]