Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: House Democrats obtain Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book.

Stay tuned. We will soon learn if Trump's letter to Epstein is real.

-aaronparnas




They say this a sketch of a naked woman, but... it's more resemblant of a teenaged girl.


That was my thought. Not the size or placement of a mature woman’s breasts.

😦
Anonymous
Come on, maga-I’m curious how many of you are going to be able to grit your teeth and claim that’s not his signature or it was planted in 2003 in anticipation of… (not clear why it would have been planted) vs how many will go with a “locker room birthday card” approach.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Today's article in the NYT Magazine on JP Morgan and Epstein is a must-read. Long, but very readable.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/08/magazine/jeffrey-epstein-jp-morgan.html?unlocked_article_code=1.kU8.LChl.gUMDyzuTd1-k&smid=url-share


Jes Staley sounds as disgusting as trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html


I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.


WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.
Anonymous
What will the Boy Blunder say now?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: House Democrats obtain Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book.

Stay tuned. We will soon learn if Trump's letter to Epstein is real.

-aaronparnas




They say this a sketch of a naked woman, but... it's more resemblant of a teenaged girl.


I did not notice but you are right and it makes my stomach turn even more. Disgusting.


Adolescent females or grown female makes no difference because are tawdry trash beneath contempt.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:One of the things we don’t talk enough about in relation to Trump is how he’s a sociopath. Things that normal people believe are morally wrong, he just doesn’t see as being wrong. One of these things is how he treats women, who he perceives as objects who exist solely to be ogled, kissed, groped, or raped. He just doesn’t see any of these things as being wrong. Here is one of his latest comments.



Sick POS


Absolutely disgusting .

How any woman or parent of a daughter voted for him, I will never understand.


I was shocked yesterday that his granddaughter Arabella was with him at the US Open. She is 14 or 15. Why would Ivanka allow this?!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html


I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.


WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.


His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.
Anonymous
WSJ Hot off the press about birthday letter!

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/epstein-birthday-book-congress-9d79ab34?st=aPJUJs
Anonymous
Heather Cox Richardson wrote this in her newsletter yesterday about Johnson's motivations to say Trump was an informant could be to make him look like "a hero." BTW he's already walked it back:

"Yesterday, talking to reporters about the Epstein files, House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said that Trump was “an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down.” The idea that Trump was secretly working to bring Epstein down is common fare among conspiracy theorists, but as Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo suggests, Johnson’s embrace of it might well be an attempt to spin material in the files before it becomes public.

Marshall notes that journalist Michael Wolff, who interviewed Epstein at length during Trump’s first presidency, says that Epstein suspected it was Trump who told the authorities about his systemic sexual assault of girls. But if so, Marshall explains, this is damning rather than exonerating.

It’s pretty well known that Trump and Epstein had a falling out in 2004 after Trump went behind Epstein’s back to buy an estate in South Florida that Epstein wanted. But at the time, Trump was headed toward bankruptcy, and it was not clear where he was getting the money to buy the estate.

Marshall calls attention to a recent interview in which Wolff said that Epstein suspected Trump was laundering money for a Russian oligarch—and indeed, Trump did flip the property to a Russian oligarch for a profit of more than $50 million a few years after buying it—and threatened to sue Trump, bringing the money laundering to light. At that point, the Epstein investigation began.

According to Wolff, Epstein believed Trump had notified the police about what was going on at Epstein’s house, which he knew because he was a frequent visitor. Marshall speculates that Johnson mentioned that Trump was an informant because that information could well be in the files the Department of Justice has, and they’re trying to spin it ahead of time to make it sound like Trump was a hero.

But both Wolff and Marshall note that if indeed Trump turned the FBI onto Epstein, it shows he knew what was taking place at Epstein’s properties.

Johnson’s claim that Trump was an FBI informant suggests Trump’s team is worried that as more and more people get access to the files, it will be increasingly difficult to hide what’s in them. Trump's demand for Republicans’ loyalty suggests that at least some of them are starting to recalculate it. And that, in turn, might have something to do with why he is putting troops in the streets."

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: House Democrats obtain Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday book.

Stay tuned. We will soon learn if Trump's letter to Epstein is real.

-aaronparnas




Soooo…is he going to drop his lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html


I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.


WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.


His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.


He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.
Anonymous
What a creep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, he was known to make drawings. And yes this is a bombshell.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-old-drawings-resurface-denies-131321640.html


I didn’t know that, thanks for the link.

There are tons of examples of him doodling. We discussed all of this when the Wall Street Journal came out with its report of the drawing months ago.


WSJ posted an analysis of the drawing, the signature matches a few letters he's written including one sent to Hillary congratulating her on her Senate win.


His signature is so distinctive that it would be practically impossible for anyone to forge.


He signed it with only his first name. They need samples of that because people are already claiming that the “tail” at the end is not his.


There are many examples if his first name only signature with the tail that appear identical, including another on another note to Epstein.
Anonymous
It's a personal birthday message. Of course he's not going to sign his last name. Why would he?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: