ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

Look who is back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

Look who is back.

Look who never leaves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else heard that ECNL is expanding? I was told they will be admitting many teams this year from their RL league and essentially having an mlsn2 but not calling it that. Will still be ECNL but with relegation.

Essentially they will have a top league and a bottom ECNL league as well as ECNL-RL.

This goes along with a rumor of a potential merger of USYS and US Club.
Would this be considered a monopoly?

Not sure how that merger has anything to do with ECNL?

ECNL is the most powerful partner in US Club.

But how does their merger with US club have to do with ECNL adding a new ECNL2 essentially.

Because ECNL is in a big battle with MLSN/GA and if US Club took over USYS (the largest org), it might help them win that battle OR so overburden them that it helps MLSN/GA gain the upper hand.

So ECNL name will mean even less? If they start letting more teams wear the badge the games will stop being Elite.

Not a hater, it’s a great business move to add a 2nd ECNL league and add a bunch of teams and have families not know the difference and everyone gets to post their kid is ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied over the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Nope! I’m pretty sure I’m the guy (well one of) that is referred as GY guy. But I did not post anything about MLSN.
I have 3 girls, and couldn’t care less about boys soccer and care even less to post an email they may or may not be fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

Just to emphasize I am not this guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone else heard that ECNL is expanding? I was told they will be admitting many teams this year from their RL league and essentially having an mlsn2 but not calling it that. Will still be ECNL but with relegation.

Essentially they will have a top league and a bottom ECNL league as well as ECNL-RL.

This goes along with a rumor of a potential merger of USYS and US Club.
Would this be considered a monopoly?

Not sure how that merger has anything to do with ECNL?

ECNL is the most powerful partner in US Club.

But how does their merger with US club have to do with ECNL adding a new ECNL2 essentially.

Because ECNL is in a big battle with MLSN/GA and if US Club took over USYS (the largest org), it might help them win that battle OR so overburden them that it helps MLSN/GA gain the upper hand.

It wont happen. Theres too many at the top of USYS and US Club that make their living off kids playing soccer. If they merged or were bought out some would be redundant and out of a job.

I’m guessing they would get a pretty nice buy out to approve the merger. But I have no real facts to back that up.

Could you imagine US club and USYS each combining and over the next 5 years creating a true club/team relegation system. Seems ideal to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Nope, age only. Grade rules are for posers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

Every collge recruiter and coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

Every college recruiter and coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

Every collge recruiter and coach.

Ok, so nobody on this thread then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

Every collge recruiter and coach.

Ok, so nobody on this thread then.

And the parents that want their kid to get recruited and not have to worry about players 1-2 years older playing down on the team they paid for at showcases.

Basically everyone but you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the GA announcment that was initially proven incorrect then later ended up being correct. (but the GA doc was made up) Probabaly the same parent thats over invested making things up to win arguements online about MLS.

You’re a world class tool.Why would someone make up a document with factual information? To try and trick people into knowing truthful information?

They did it before with both a fake "So Cal" announcement then a fake GA document. This looks a lot like both of them.

Just because crazy person happened to be correct on a 50/50 decision doesnt mean the docs were any less fake.

I just don’t see the logic behind what you’re saying? Someone is faking documents with information that is true?

Yes, someone was faking documents last year about "So Cal" (SOCAL league in California) and GA. The documents were proven to be fake. But, 6-8 months later they ended up being partially right. At the tine the fake docs were a 50/50 decision for leagues. Just because whoever created them was partially right doesn't make them any less fake.

Can you provide the link? I’m not understanding how someone can be partially right? They would be wrong or right? Is this MLSN person linked to same account?

First there was misspellings all over the "So Cal" announcement. I believe they also provided a date when it would occur and SY window of 9/1-8/31. Both turned out to be false. I dont remember what was weird about the GA fake doc. Might have been fonts or somehting. Both looked a lot like this one.

Believe whatever you want but be aware that there are people willing to fake documents to win arguements online or maybe try to pressure MLS into what they want to occur.

The misspellings are from the poster HERE, not in the screenshot on Reddit of the message -- which looks more legit.

Im talking about the misspellings on the fake So Cal document from last year.

Right to draw comparisons to the MLSN message -- which doesn't have misspellings (except for the poster who copied it here)!

The brush used to black out something in the MLS doc/pic is/was the same brush used to black out something in the GA fake doc.

When I saw that = Highly suspicious

All sorts of people do that to preserve anonymity. That's not really a red flag. That's someone using their computer.

Its more likely that the same people drafted both the GA and MLS screenshots.

What are you debating that is being said? It provides no information so should be pretty easy to confirm with your DOC. Whether this email is true or not it’s almost a certainty that mlsn has not made a decision and will communicate when they do.

Fake is fake. It casts a heavy shadow on what's attempting to be relayed.

The likely person that wrote the fake So Cal and GA docs used to comment here saying whats the big deal if they ended up being mostly true.

First, they were fake.
Second, they were 50/50 guesses that happened to be partially true

So all posts of photos with the black out of other people’s names and email address is all from one person?

All in the hopes of tricking people to believe the truth before it’s official?

Actually, what I see is the thread troll here looking for something new and dumb to argue about to the point they even perhaps copied it with the spelling errors here to make it seem fake to bolster the case!

I think theres a very good chance that GY Dad is the one that created the fake MLS screenshot. He probabaly did the same with the GA and So Cal docs.

Yes! And all maybe with the goal of trolling THIS thread.

Its pretty simple.

GY Guy wants clubs to switch from BY to SY because its that much closer to letting his kid play in showcases on a team of players 1-2 years younger.

GY Guy fights against SY 8/1-7/31 with a rule that younger players must play on a team with their grade in school. Because he knows that if implemeted GY is 100% never going to happen. Players will all be the same age on the field and calls for implementing GY will be ignored.

No, you are off here.

The GY guy wants kids forced to play on grade. He can't drop making rules grade based where now grades are irrelevant, hates RAE, wants SY+ BS because it forces GY, etc. Nobody else wants GY but him.

I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. They could replace them all with ID sessions if they wanted. But there have been rumors of changes although I don't think anybody is advocating for changes or against here.

Come on just be honest...

"I don't think anybody cares about showcases and they don't matter to the age group discussion because they should just be exhibitions. "

Well said GY guy. We all know you want GY at showcases so your kid can play down on team with players 1-2 years younger.

Can you cite someone asking for grades at Showcases? I do not recall anyone. Thanks.

Every collge recruiter and coach.

Ok, so nobody on this thread then.

And the parents that want their kid to get recruited and not have to worry about players 1-2 years older playing down on the team they paid for at showcases.

Basically everyone but you

Again, can you cite someone?