Kamala Harris for President

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The press wants content for their product. They aren’t serious people. The proof is that they pretended to care about a candidate’s age daily for weeks with screaming headlines. Now that the elderly Trump is the old man in the race, the press developed collective amnesia about how vitally important age & mental acuity are.

Until they hold Trump to the same standards as they do Democratic politicians, Harris shouldn’t feed the trolls.

You think the press wants to help Trump? They ate doing their best to completely ignore his campaign because whenever they attack him he gets more popular.

What happens when we just let him talk?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is infuriating that our only choices are an empty-headed idiotic populist wannabe tyrant with a stupid spendthrift VP candidate and an erratic, unpredictable, petty, ridiculous and dangerous wannabe tyrant with a crazy, dangerous wannabe-tyrant VP candidate.

Never have two such horrible teams faced off. Never would have been easier for a halfway decent candidate on wither side to defeat any of these.

A grotesque, absurd, tragic situation.

Vote for Jill Stein.

She’s the best option this season.

Seriously

[Anonymous]

Ew. Jill Stein is a Russian asset. No thank you, not going back to THAT either.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jill-steins-ties-to-vladimir-putin-explained/ar-AA1jHUHY
Jill Stein's Ties to Vladimir Putin Explained

[Anonymous]

Harris seems like a consensus builder which works to her advantage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is infuriating that our only choices are an empty-headed idiotic populist wannabe tyrant with a stupid spendthrift VP candidate and an erratic, unpredictable, petty, ridiculous and dangerous wannabe tyrant with a crazy, dangerous wannabe-tyrant VP candidate.

Never have two such horrible teams faced off. Never would have been easier for a halfway decent candidate on wither side to defeat any of these.

A grotesque, absurd, tragic situation.

Comparing normal politicians like Harris & Walz trying to do normal government stuff with a rapist conman who tried to overthrow our government is pretty bizarre.

+1

[Anonymous]

When is the Heritage Foundation planning to file their lawsuit to keep Biden as the nominee? Mike Johnson said they have a really good case!

[Anonymous]

She spoke directly, coherently and at the level of specificity a presidential candidate should speak.

Now STFU about her not taking questions.

Rambling press conferences from Fat Elvis Trump have less substance over 2 hours of incoherent thoughts strung together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She never answered the question........

Because trump and Vance are always straightforward and accurate with their comments.

[Anonymous]

The Russian tolls were out last night commenting. Shouldn't you be protecting your land as the Ukrainians take over Russian soil?

[Anonymous]

big

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She spoke directly, coherently and at the level of specificity a presidential candidate should speak.

Now STFU about her not taking questions.

Rambling press conferences from Fat Elvis Trump have less substance over 2 hours of incoherent thoughts strung together.

She didn't answer the question. At all. Just some drivel about "return on investment" which means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She spoke directly, coherently and at the level of specificity a presidential candidate should speak.

Now STFU about her not taking questions.

Rambling press conferences from Fat Elvis Trump have less substance over 2 hours of incoherent thoughts strung together.

Too many years of hypnosis by Fat Orange Elvis has made you forget what normal politicians sound like.

She didn't answer the question. At all. Just some drivel about "return on investment" which means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She spoke directly, coherently and at the level of specificity a presidential candidate should speak.

Now STFU about her not taking questions.

Rambling press conferences from Fat Elvis Trump have less substance over 2 hours of incoherent thoughts strung together.

She didn't answer the question. At all. Just some drivel about "return on investment" which means nothing.

When your candidate starts making sense and being specific then you can talk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She spoke directly, coherently and at the level of specificity a presidential candidate should speak.

Now STFU about her not taking questions.

Rambling press conferences from Fat Elvis Trump have less substance over 2 hours of incoherent thoughts strung together.

She didn't answer the question. At all. Just some drivel about "return on investment" which means nothing.

This really isn’t going well. They need to stop her from speaking in public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

big

He can say whatever he wants publicly who knows what his actual vote will be same for all these endorsements.