Name calling - a desperation tactic |
Atheism is a religion itself complete with fanatics and bigots. Vanna Bonta |
Name calling - a desperation tactic |
I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up. They have no holidays” Henry Youngman |
Love this! |
Simone Weil was not an atheist. She was a very conflicted Catholic. https://uscatholic.org/articles/202101/simone-weil-a-kindred-spirit-for-church-outsiders/ |
The name calling on this thread has definitely gone both ways and yes, it's a fallacy. |
But the whining is pretty one-sided. |
Someone claimed “objective evidence” earlier. Still waiting on that. |
I wouldn't hold your breath. |
Weil was born into a secular household and raised in "complete agnosticism". https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Si... Simone Weil - Wikipedia |
Did you even read the Wikipedia article you linked? Quotes from Weil about God are all over it. Weil would not have been considered orthodox by any church, but that does not make her an atheist! In fact by the standards of this thread the fact that she believed in God makes her complicit in basically all the ills of the modern era. And she undeniably believed in God. Or are you ignoring her saying such things as "I love God" and "Christ himself took possession of me?" |
Missed that post but objective evidence is not necessary for validating religious beliefs/ knowledge. It can’t be done via the scientific method. |
Invalidating religious beliefs/knowledge (proving the negative, or proving the belief that God does not exist) also can't be done via the scientific method. It is by definition impossible. Though if you use the definition of objective as "unrelated to feelings," then perhaps you can throw out a collection of facts that skew to one side or the other. Evidence != proof. |
Okay that is fair to some extent - I read some of her philosophy elsewhere and she did self-identify as agnostic - however you are right that she appears to have become more mystical leaning as she got older. Stanford EP does not identify her as a Christian philosopher per se but notes she synthesized perspectives of Catholic doctrine with wisdom from various traditions such as ancient Greek philosophy and tragedies, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism. Simone Weil (1909–1943) philosophized on thresholds and across borders. Her persistent desire for truth and justice led her to both elite academies and factory floors, political praxis and spiritual solitude. At different times she was an activist, a pacifist, a militant, a mystic, and an exile; but throughout, in her inquiry into reality and orientation to the good, she remained a philosopher. Her oeuvre features deliberate contradiction yet demonstrates remarkable clarity. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simone-weil/ The main point that is relevant here is that is that she expressed her subtle ideas in interesting ways. Not a sledge hammer. |