It is an elective. |
Electives need to meet educational requirements too. That's why AP had to walk back and drop the intersectional blahblah that shouldn't have been there to begin with. |
No one is arguing that historical movements or individuals should not be included in a history class. But teaching "Queer Theory" is not history, and it is controversial and does go against many people's religions, including Blacks. Isn't there any humility about what GOVERNMENT schools should teach? "which challenge the notion that heterosexual desire is ‘normal’.[2] Following social constructivist developments in sociology, queer theorists are often critical of what they consider essentialist views of sexuality and gender. Instead, they study those concepts as social and cultural phenomena, often through an analysis of the categories, binaries, and language in which they are said to be portrayed." - another APUSH teacher |
Actually, I think it is a lot more likely that China funds the course and it is used to brainwash the people in the class. |
Don’t speak for “the black community.” Queer theory belongs in an LGBT program, not snuck into a Black history course. I dont know a single Black parent not on some LGBT nonprofit’s payroll who disapproves these changes. They should have kept BLM, but it’s NBD honestly. Black history is more than what white progressives care about. I even like the part on Black conservatives. They’re part of Black history too whether or not you like it. This program is much better than the kitchen sink foolishness Desantis torpedoed. He might not have had good motives, but the effect of his objections is good. |
All of this. The previous version was Black History According to White People Who Don’t Know Their Place. Keep that nonsense out of AA Studies. |
He had good motives, he dared to fight, and he broght great results. |
|
You missed the little part about how the college board initially denied it was including CRT instruction within the course, then in this announcement, said they were removing CRT components and authors from the course. Caught lying. |
|
All the authors banned are pretty much basic, foundational authors for thinking about black experience in the US.
Shows how powerful they are that so many are scared by their writings. |
|
I find it concerning that LGBT issues get folded in with racial issues as a disguise.
The Respect for Marriage seemed to do just that. There was a very tiny threat to the concept of interracial marriage. However, the LGBT community grabbed it and packaged it along with gay marriage to get the agenda going. In this case, somehow, understanding African American culture also involves understanding gay issues. |
Yup |
Because of course there are no black gays. |
Seriously, how many awards has Ta-Nahisi Coates won? |
Please quote the actual phrase where they said “we are cutting CRT from the curriculum.” Verbatim. See below the statement they put out. Where did they state they were “cutting CRT”? https://newsroom.collegeboard.org/advanced-placement-program-releases-official-ap-african-american-studies-framework Oops, were you caught lying? |
He's dumb and a poor writer. There are a million better authors for an AA course. |