Gaza War, Part 3

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Palestinian victims will reach 50 thousands or more before Biden threatens to slow the supply of weapons.


Biden will never slow the supply of weapons. Biden is at war with the Palestinians civilians. This war has shown what a fake he is. He pushes out how his family was taken away from him and how hard it is on the survivors…less you are a Palestinian. Palestinians and others just are not considered human by Biden.


I agree. Biden needs to resign -- for everyone's sake. He represents a paradigm that recently died.


Not only he won't resign but he'll be reelected so you'll get five full years to keep whinning.


My fear is he'll open the door for Trump.


The far left is about to elect Trump in order to save Palestinians.

Trump will help Israel destroy Palestine.

Trump will do irreparable damage to the most vulnerable populations in America.

Trump will do irreparable damage to America itself.

It's truly idiotic on every level.



I agree, which is why Biden needs to go. He staked his future on supporting Israel's genocidal regime and found himself on the wrong side of history. He's badly weakened himself and needs to step aside so someone more electable can take over.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Palestinian victims will reach 50 thousands or more before Biden threatens to slow the supply of weapons.


Biden will never slow the supply of weapons. Biden is at war with the Palestinians civilians. This war has shown what a fake he is. He pushes out how his family was taken away from him and how hard it is on the survivors…less you are a Palestinian. Palestinians and others just are not considered human by Biden.


I agree. Biden needs to resign -- for everyone's sake. He represents a paradigm that recently died.


Not only he won't resign but he'll be reelected so you'll get five full years to keep whinning.


My fear is he'll open the door for Trump.


The far left is about to elect Trump in order to save Palestinians.

Trump will help Israel destroy Palestine.

Trump will do irreparable damage to the most vulnerable populations in America.

Trump will do irreparable damage to America itself.

It's truly idiotic on every level.



+1


Biden is doing a mighty fine job destroying Palestine as well. Biden has done irreparable damage to the vulnerable populations in this country as well. Tell me three things where Biden has helped vulnerable populations. He’s a senile old man who can’t keep his sentences straight. Our votes can no longer be bought. Can’t wait to vote for the Green Party! And don’t complain because the democrats should have put forward a better candidate to generate excitement amongst the far left.


Domestically, he’s pursued nothing less than a transformation of the American social safety net, with an agenda comprising a dizzying number of progressive policy goals. Biden has accomplished quite a lot of them—perhaps more than most political observers expected with such narrow Democratic majorities on Capitol Hill. Some of his legislative moves, on infrastructure and clean-energy manufacturing, for example, have even been bipartisan victories.

Read about them yourself: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/11/biden-2022-midterms-policy-record-approval/671941/

But let's not turn this into a thread about Biden.

You either vote for Biden or you've voted for Trump. You choose for yourself, but I will NEVER forgive the far left if they help elect Trump.


All true and Biden deserves great credit for his accomplishments, but many on the left will see his support for Israel as a dealbreaker and feel strongly enough that they don't care about your forgiveness. Biden has done an excellent job in many areas, but he now has this albatross around his neck. Another Trump presidency would be an absolute disaster, and we can't risk that possibility by not retiring Biden. He has lost support among a crucial demographic -- young voters. That said, it's only January and the election is in November. Many things could change by then, including Trump's support collapsing and Biden rehabilitating himself with young people. As it looks at the moment, though, supporting Biden may help elect Trump.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I find both sides of this war to be abhorrent and despicable. BOTH. It is hard for me to understand any of it on a human level sometimes because I cannot even kill a bug in my home let alone conceive of killing one other human unless they came into my home and threatened me or my family. However, it gets tiring when the narrative on one side is always "piss people off, take from them because you are better than they are, and then get angry when they attack you and claim you are the victim". It gets old and I hope at some point in my lifetime people will evolve past needing a particular piece of land to "settle their people" on and learn how to live in peace or at least move towards teaching living in peace. But each side has entrenched themselves in their beliefs, then it has created hatred and anger that will last generations and may never end.


Once the majority of human society evolves to this position of compassion, we will finally have peace. Steven Pinker's hopeful books, Enlightenment Now and The Better Angels of our Nature, give me some optimism that we'll get there eventually, but the human race is still much too primitive and savage. Not to be facetious, but our best hope in this current conflict is to wait 200 years. There will come a time when the vast majority of people find violence and injustice so repugnant that the roots of conflict will be greatly reduced. I don't believe Israel will exist as an ethnonationalist state 200 years from now -- not because Israel will suffer a military defeat but because Israelis themselves will become uncomfortable with bullying Palestinians and taking their lands and home. There'll also be some sort of effective international order and justice system that handles criminal and anarchistic behavior in ways that resolve rather than escalate problems. Well ... maybe
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t anyone going to comment?

US confirms hospital used by Hamas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/politics/gaza-hospital-hamas.html


What, no WMD? No glass vial to shake?

Not a subscriber to NY times, but I can tell you that neither side is squeaky clean or spotless and the first casualty in war is the truth.
Right now it is the Palestinians who are doing the dying and suffering in very large numbers.
The end does not justify the means, not anymore



The bolded- it has ALWAYS been Palestinians being murdered and otherwise killed in very large numbers since the late 1940s, and 10/7/23 is the sole exception. When you frame the conflict as you do, it’s dishonest.


Yes, they have a lot of casualties because they start wars and can't finish them. They are not the victims.


“They”? Do you think all Palestinians are to blame? Such a lack of compassion.

My understanding from reading history is that Zionists were the original provocateurs. Palestinians responded. Violence escalated with each and every back and forth. Vastly more Palestinians have died (and kidnapped, ie held without charges) than Israeli over the years. The suffering that the escalation has now reached is terrible. And has just created a new generation of people who hate Israel.

I hope the US begins to link support to Israel to changes in how they treat Palestinians. I believe this will happen in the next 20-30 years.


It doesn’t matter what you want to think or what thoughts give you comfort. The truth is, the Palestinians start conflicts, the people they started conflicts with fight back, the Palestinians can't match the fighting, then cry victim. If you want to think, think about this, after all these years of fighting, why do the Palestinians have NOTHING they want? No accomplishments?


They do. You just can't see it. Israelis and Palestinians have an unspoken contract as so many do in the Middle East. Here are the terms:

Israelis: Palestinians, I will take your land.

Palestinians: you will, but you will never feel safe in it.


This is an accomplishment?


I dunno what to tell you. I come from a place where blood vendettas are still practiced. If you were a much stronger military power that stole my land and took away my civil rights, I would consider it a terrific accomplishment if your children cowered in fear now and again.



Right?

So in that moral world, it's totally acceptable to murder, rape, torture, and kidnap the "other." And then when the "other." who is much stronger militarily, obliterates your family and friends, it's ok. Because for a brief Saturday morning, the "other's" children cowered in fear.

Totally worth it.

Welcome to Palestinian thinking.


What do you think is acceptable resistance to land theft and disenfranchisement? To settler violence? Tell us. The West Bank is waiting with bated breath.


DP.

1. Attack military targets; or

2. Accept one of the 47 peace deals (exaggerating, but only slightly) that has been offered since 1947 that would give you a state, albeit an imperfect one.


Interesting. So do I take it you'll give them a pass for attacking a military base and taking a bunch of soldiers hostage? Just checking.

Also, is it okay to respond to settler violence with violence? Would that be terrorism or something else? Again just checking.


Yes on attacking a military base. Go for it. (But Israel would then have the right to respond militarily with attacks against military targets).

Yes on using force to defend against settler violence. Right to self-defense is a given. Not terrorism.

Attacking settlers not engaged in violence = terrorism.

It's pretty straightforward.


Is it though? A settler, even if not engaged in outright violence, is settling on the illegally seized land. His entire presence on the land is an act of theft and violence that invites self-defense. What is the appropriate self-defending response to illegal settlements?


Assuming for a moment that the land is illegally seized (I tend to agree that it is, but obviously a contentious issue), the governing authority (the PA in this case) should forcibly remove the settlers and reclaim the settled land.


It's only contentious in the sense that the entity that seized the land disagrees (but then what do you expect them to do? say yeah we stole it?) with it. Pretty much everyone in the world, including every single State Department admin up to Mr Pompeo who decided to buck the trend by declaring that some settlers are very fine people.
Anonymous
Name a country that is not partially on "stolen land"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t anyone going to comment?

US confirms hospital used by Hamas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/politics/gaza-hospital-hamas.html


What, no WMD? No glass vial to shake?

Not a subscriber to NY times, but I can tell you that neither side is squeaky clean or spotless and the first casualty in war is the truth.
Right now it is the Palestinians who are doing the dying and suffering in very large numbers.
The end does not justify the means, not anymore



The bolded- it has ALWAYS been Palestinians being murdered and otherwise killed in very large numbers since the late 1940s, and 10/7/23 is the sole exception. When you frame the conflict as you do, it’s dishonest.


Yes, they have a lot of casualties because they start wars and can't finish them. They are not the victims.


“They”? Do you think all Palestinians are to blame? Such a lack of compassion.

My understanding from reading history is that Zionists were the original provocateurs. Palestinians responded. Violence escalated with each and every back and forth. Vastly more Palestinians have died (and kidnapped, ie held without charges) than Israeli over the years. The suffering that the escalation has now reached is terrible. And has just created a new generation of people who hate Israel.

I hope the US begins to link support to Israel to changes in how they treat Palestinians. I believe this will happen in the next 20-30 years.


It doesn’t matter what you want to think or what thoughts give you comfort. The truth is, the Palestinians start conflicts, the people they started conflicts with fight back, the Palestinians can't match the fighting, then cry victim. If you want to think, think about this, after all these years of fighting, why do the Palestinians have NOTHING they want? No accomplishments?


They do. You just can't see it. Israelis and Palestinians have an unspoken contract as so many do in the Middle East. Here are the terms:

Israelis: Palestinians, I will take your land.

Palestinians: you will, but you will never feel safe in it.


Listen, if your one accomplishment is your embrace of terrorism, you might aim a little higher...

From the knees to the crotch.


Oh they got the crotch, didn't they? Hamas terrorists broke pelvises, shot/stabbed/drove nails into crotches. Swell bunch of guys you folks admire.



I see we still have someone who thinks ZAKA reports are trustworthy despite ample evidence of lies and incompetence . Okay.


Wait, wtf? There are people who deny that horrific rape and sexual abuse happened? The animals video'd themselves.


Yes Virginia, there are people who don’t believe ZAKA, an organization repeatedly caught in lies and incompetence, an organization that works in cahoots with Bibi. That’s what happens when you lie: people stop believing you.


^ This is the far left version of qanon. You're just as sick and morally bankrupt as those evil clowns.


The head of ZAKA was Jeffrey Epstein on steroids. That’s irrefutable. But you do you, I guess, child molester weirdo.


I don't understand why the NYT article on Hamas' rapes quotes Yossi Landau of ZAKA. Landau is a documented liar who was behind the fake atrocity stories that have been debunked by now, but not before making it around the world.

Landau is personally responsible for “confirming” the bogus tale of Hamas beheading babies in kibbutz Kfar Aza – a contrivance which President Joseph Biden promoted against the advice of his aides. As CBS News reported on October 11, Landau said he “saw with his own eyes children and babies who had been beheaded.”

An Israeli army spokesperson took Landau’s claim and ran with it, declaring that “a senior official in the Israeli coronary service” had confirmed the allegation of beheaded babies. In fact, ZAKA is a religious service with no coronary qualifications.

The claim then made its way to CNN, which dedicated almost an entire hour of a primetime broadcast to the imagined atrocity based on “confirmation” from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. US President Joe Biden echoed the allegation next, sleepily proclaiming during a press conference that he had seen “pictures of terrorists beheading children.” The president thus ignored the record of confirmed deaths from October 7, which showed that only one baby, a 10-month-old named Mila Cohen, had been killed.

Landau was also behind the story of a pregnant woman with her stomach cut open (false), and of a pile of burned children ("at least 20!"). Official records show there were 13 children killed total, and the most found in one location was three. The pregnant victim story was so compelling that the first lady of Israel tweeted it out - except the footage included as proof came from Mexico in 2017, and the "medic" quoted (Landau) has no medical qualifications.

All this information is freely available. So why is NYT quoting a known liar?

The sister of the woman profiled in NYT apparently has some issues with how her sister was covered.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Israel in talks concerning "voluntary" resettlement of Gazans

On Tuesday, during a conference held in the Knesset to examine possibilities for postwar Gaza, Gamliel said: “At the end of the war, Hamas rule will collapse. There are no municipal authorities; the civilian population will be entirely dependent on humanitarian aid. There will be no work, and 60% of Gaza’s agricultural land will become security buffer zones.”

“The Gaza problem is not just our problem,” Gamliel said. “The world should support humanitarian emigration, because that’s the only solution I know.”

He does have a point
Gaza cannot be rebuilt, there are many unexploded shells, and there is no economy. If they are not fed by aid they will all starve. They are starving now as it is
At the same time Israel doesn’t have a right to redraw the borders of Gaza, just like Putin does not have a right to redraw the border of Ukraine

Gazans are not going to emigrate, so the solution he is proposing is moot.
Israelis are free to emigrate
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Name a country that is not partially on "stolen land"

Sweden, Norway, Russia, Indonesia, Britain, Ireland: the list goes on

Yes, countries have been conquered and invaded in the centuries before modern time. But that age is over
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Palestinian victims will reach 50 thousands or more before Biden threatens to slow the supply of weapons.


Biden will never slow the supply of weapons. Biden is at war with the Palestinians civilians. This war has shown what a fake he is. He pushes out how his family was taken away from him and how hard it is on the survivors…less you are a Palestinian. Palestinians and others just are not considered human by Biden.


I agree. Biden needs to resign -- for everyone's sake. He represents a paradigm that recently died.


Not only he won't resign but he'll be reelected so you'll get five full years to keep whinning.


My fear is he'll open the door for Trump.


The far left is about to elect Trump in order to save Palestinians.

Trump will help Israel destroy Palestine.

Trump will do irreparable damage to the most vulnerable populations in America.

Trump will do irreparable damage to America itself.

It's truly idiotic on every level.



+1


Place restraints on Israel if you don't want it to happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Name a country that is not partially on "stolen land"

Sweden, Norway, Russia, Indonesia, Britain, Ireland: the list goes on

Yes, countries have been conquered and invaded in the centuries before modern time. But that age is over


Russia? What about Ukraine?

Britain? You’re kidding right? Look up the phrase “the sun rises and sets on the British empire.”

Ireland fought wars for their land with Britain

There’s nothing new or different here with Palestine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t anyone going to comment?

US confirms hospital used by Hamas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/politics/gaza-hospital-hamas.html


What, no WMD? No glass vial to shake?

Not a subscriber to NY times, but I can tell you that neither side is squeaky clean or spotless and the first casualty in war is the truth.
Right now it is the Palestinians who are doing the dying and suffering in very large numbers.
The end does not justify the means, not anymore



The bolded- it has ALWAYS been Palestinians being murdered and otherwise killed in very large numbers since the late 1940s, and 10/7/23 is the sole exception. When you frame the conflict as you do, it’s dishonest.


Yes, they have a lot of casualties because they start wars and can't finish them. They are not the victims.


“They”? Do you think all Palestinians are to blame? Such a lack of compassion.

My understanding from reading history is that Zionists were the original provocateurs. Palestinians responded. Violence escalated with each and every back and forth. Vastly more Palestinians have died (and kidnapped, ie held without charges) than Israeli over the years. The suffering that the escalation has now reached is terrible. And has just created a new generation of people who hate Israel.

I hope the US begins to link support to Israel to changes in how they treat Palestinians. I believe this will happen in the next 20-30 years.


It doesn’t matter what you want to think or what thoughts give you comfort. The truth is, the Palestinians start conflicts, the people they started conflicts with fight back, the Palestinians can't match the fighting, then cry victim. If you want to think, think about this, after all these years of fighting, why do the Palestinians have NOTHING they want? No accomplishments?


They do. You just can't see it. Israelis and Palestinians have an unspoken contract as so many do in the Middle East. Here are the terms:

Israelis: Palestinians, I will take your land.

Palestinians: you will, but you will never feel safe in it.


Listen, if your one accomplishment is your embrace of terrorism, you might aim a little higher...

From the knees to the crotch.


Oh they got the crotch, didn't they? Hamas terrorists broke pelvises, shot/stabbed/drove nails into crotches. Swell bunch of guys you folks admire.



I see we still have someone who thinks ZAKA reports are trustworthy despite ample evidence of lies and incompetence . Okay.


Wait, wtf? There are people who deny that horrific rape and sexual abuse happened? The animals video'd themselves.


Yes Virginia, there are people who don’t believe ZAKA, an organization repeatedly caught in lies and incompetence, an organization that works in cahoots with Bibi. That’s what happens when you lie: people stop believing you.


^ This is the far left version of qanon. You're just as sick and morally bankrupt as those evil clowns.


The head of ZAKA was Jeffrey Epstein on steroids. That’s irrefutable. But you do you, I guess, child molester weirdo.


I don't understand why the NYT article on Hamas' rapes quotes Yossi Landau of ZAKA. Landau is a documented liar who was behind the fake atrocity stories that have been debunked by now, but not before making it around the world.

Landau is personally responsible for “confirming” the bogus tale of Hamas beheading babies in kibbutz Kfar Aza – a contrivance which President Joseph Biden promoted against the advice of his aides. As CBS News reported on October 11, Landau said he “saw with his own eyes children and babies who had been beheaded.”

An Israeli army spokesperson took Landau’s claim and ran with it, declaring that “a senior official in the Israeli coronary service” had confirmed the allegation of beheaded babies. In fact, ZAKA is a religious service with no coronary qualifications.

The claim then made its way to CNN, which dedicated almost an entire hour of a primetime broadcast to the imagined atrocity based on “confirmation” from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. US President Joe Biden echoed the allegation next, sleepily proclaiming during a press conference that he had seen “pictures of terrorists beheading children.” The president thus ignored the record of confirmed deaths from October 7, which showed that only one baby, a 10-month-old named Mila Cohen, had been killed.

Landau was also behind the story of a pregnant woman with her stomach cut open (false), and of a pile of burned children ("at least 20!"). Official records show there were 13 children killed total, and the most found in one location was three. The pregnant victim story was so compelling that the first lady of Israel tweeted it out - except the footage included as proof came from Mexico in 2017, and the "medic" quoted (Landau) has no medical qualifications.

All this information is freely available. So why is NYT quoting a known liar?

The sister of the woman profiled in NYT apparently has some issues with how her sister was covered.




So we’re still debating whether sexual assault happened on October 7? Wow, you’re really low. Jeff - are you really tolerating this?
Anonymous
I support our commander in chief. Funny how you all rip Israel apart, but not even a peep lately about Russia. Says a lot about posters here who were quick to judge what/whom they hate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Name a country that is not partially on "stolen land"

Sweden, Norway, Russia, Indonesia, Britain, Ireland: the list goes on

Yes, countries have been conquered and invaded in the centuries before modern time. But that age is over


Russia? What about Ukraine?

Britain? You’re kidding right? Look up the phrase “the sun rises and sets on the British empire.”

Ireland fought wars for their land with Britain

There’s nothing new or different here with Palestine.

What century are you living in?
Why the sudden need to empty Gaza?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I support our commander in chief. Funny how you all rip Israel apart, but not even a peep lately about Russia. Says a lot about posters here who were quick to judge what/whom they hate.

What a wild accusation
Do you have any data to support your claim?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Isn’t anyone going to comment?

US confirms hospital used by Hamas.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/politics/gaza-hospital-hamas.html


What, no WMD? No glass vial to shake?

Not a subscriber to NY times, but I can tell you that neither side is squeaky clean or spotless and the first casualty in war is the truth.
Right now it is the Palestinians who are doing the dying and suffering in very large numbers.
The end does not justify the means, not anymore



The bolded- it has ALWAYS been Palestinians being murdered and otherwise killed in very large numbers since the late 1940s, and 10/7/23 is the sole exception. When you frame the conflict as you do, it’s dishonest.


Yes, they have a lot of casualties because they start wars and can't finish them. They are not the victims.


“They”? Do you think all Palestinians are to blame? Such a lack of compassion.

My understanding from reading history is that Zionists were the original provocateurs. Palestinians responded. Violence escalated with each and every back and forth. Vastly more Palestinians have died (and kidnapped, ie held without charges) than Israeli over the years. The suffering that the escalation has now reached is terrible. And has just created a new generation of people who hate Israel.

I hope the US begins to link support to Israel to changes in how they treat Palestinians. I believe this will happen in the next 20-30 years.


It doesn’t matter what you want to think or what thoughts give you comfort. The truth is, the Palestinians start conflicts, the people they started conflicts with fight back, the Palestinians can't match the fighting, then cry victim. If you want to think, think about this, after all these years of fighting, why do the Palestinians have NOTHING they want? No accomplishments?


They do. You just can't see it. Israelis and Palestinians have an unspoken contract as so many do in the Middle East. Here are the terms:

Israelis: Palestinians, I will take your land.

Palestinians: you will, but you will never feel safe in it.


Listen, if your one accomplishment is your embrace of terrorism, you might aim a little higher...

From the knees to the crotch.


Oh they got the crotch, didn't they? Hamas terrorists broke pelvises, shot/stabbed/drove nails into crotches. Swell bunch of guys you folks admire.



I see we still have someone who thinks ZAKA reports are trustworthy despite ample evidence of lies and incompetence . Okay.


Wait, wtf? There are people who deny that horrific rape and sexual abuse happened? The animals video'd themselves.


Yes Virginia, there are people who don’t believe ZAKA, an organization repeatedly caught in lies and incompetence, an organization that works in cahoots with Bibi. That’s what happens when you lie: people stop believing you.


^ This is the far left version of qanon. You're just as sick and morally bankrupt as those evil clowns.


The head of ZAKA was Jeffrey Epstein on steroids. That’s irrefutable. But you do you, I guess, child molester weirdo.


I don't understand why the NYT article on Hamas' rapes quotes Yossi Landau of ZAKA. Landau is a documented liar who was behind the fake atrocity stories that have been debunked by now, but not before making it around the world.

Landau is personally responsible for “confirming” the bogus tale of Hamas beheading babies in kibbutz Kfar Aza – a contrivance which President Joseph Biden promoted against the advice of his aides. As CBS News reported on October 11, Landau said he “saw with his own eyes children and babies who had been beheaded.”

An Israeli army spokesperson took Landau’s claim and ran with it, declaring that “a senior official in the Israeli coronary service” had confirmed the allegation of beheaded babies. In fact, ZAKA is a religious service with no coronary qualifications.

The claim then made its way to CNN, which dedicated almost an entire hour of a primetime broadcast to the imagined atrocity based on “confirmation” from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. US President Joe Biden echoed the allegation next, sleepily proclaiming during a press conference that he had seen “pictures of terrorists beheading children.” The president thus ignored the record of confirmed deaths from October 7, which showed that only one baby, a 10-month-old named Mila Cohen, had been killed.

Landau was also behind the story of a pregnant woman with her stomach cut open (false), and of a pile of burned children ("at least 20!"). Official records show there were 13 children killed total, and the most found in one location was three. The pregnant victim story was so compelling that the first lady of Israel tweeted it out - except the footage included as proof came from Mexico in 2017, and the "medic" quoted (Landau) has no medical qualifications.

All this information is freely available. So why is NYT quoting a known liar?

The sister of the woman profiled in NYT apparently has some issues with how her sister was covered.




So we’re still debating whether sexual assault happened on October 7? Wow, you’re really low. Jeff - are you really tolerating this?


No moron, we are debating whether the evidence presented in the NYT article meets the sniff test. But please feel free to point any factual inaccuracies in the post.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: