Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

It’s not new, you’re just too old to know what young people are up to.

Super, then define it. Here. Now.

What's with the tone? Do you think everyone responding to you is collectively making up a fake word?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groypers

Thanks,
Looks stupid.
I’ll pass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Fuentes gives a eulogy

I think people have to be more careful about the environment they participate in and create online. He probably didn’t expect his “groyper war” to turn info real life actions. He probably really does feel bad about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

There's no "new talking point" - it's just you idiots with your same old bogus talking point of "blame everything on the left" even when all indications now are that the shooter was alt-right. When your stale talking point doesn't comport with reality you complain and accuse others of changing the narrative, when in fact it was yours that was wrong all along.

+1

DCUM is the original realtime BS creator

You must realize that it’s not just DCUM, right? If you have down time, you can watch as the same nonsense argument hits Reddit and DCUM at the same time. I’m sure twitter and whatever Trump’s twitter is called get the same crap at the same time too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212
https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114

Social media users continue to pick apart unverified information gleaned from the social media accounts of the alleged shooter’s family. But it’s still too early to definitively say what Robinson believed.

“Bella Ciao” is an old anti-fascist song dedicated to anti-Nazi resistance fighters in Italy during World War II.

Groypers, the term for far-right and white nationalist social media users who are terminally online and follow white supremacist Nick Fuentes, seemed uneasy in their discussions on 4Chan Friday, with some seeing overlap in the etched messages and typical Groyper humor.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212

[Anonymous]

At this point, his political affinity is so muddled that nobody knows the motive.

The truth is the guy wanted attention and he got it. He wanted to be a streamer and he got the ultimate stream. He is going to pay for it with his life.

I hate political violence. I don't want anyone to shoot anyone ever. But that's unpopular opinion on the right which supports gun policies that resulted in 40,000 people dying last year.

Kirk is just another name on this year's list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was an unhinged leftist and the people who are trying to paint him as a right winger should be ashamed. The only way to lower the temperature of our political climate is to have honest conversations about what is happening. People are becoming increasingly radicalized and justifying the use of violence. Something like this should have never happened and we need to make sure it doesn’t happen in the future. If your kid has a sudden interest in left wing politics then you need to view it as a red flag. Make sure they don’t have access to weapons and suggest that they go to therapy or start exercising.

Try again I’m tired of the RW noise in this!!!

The FBI run by MAGA already said he was radicalized and felt Kirk wasn’t conservative enough

Take your Christian right crap a d screw you! We are the United Status of America Charlie Kirk was the worst of humans can be. He spewed hate daily and while he was doing that he conned his cult out of their hard earned monies.

You are not an American nor do you have brain cells

Charlie Kirk is not a hero he was a disgrace to the human race. Our military died due our freedom and you maga morons want a dictator to tell you how to breathe and walk and talk that is not the American way!

Just stop. You hate the military and America, pretending to go on about what is “American” is gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212
https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114

Social media users continue to pick apart unverified information gleaned from the social media accounts of the alleged shooter’s family. But it’s still too early to definitively say what Robinson believed.

“Bella Ciao” is an old anti-fascist song dedicated to anti-Nazi resistance fighters in Italy during World War II.

Groypers, the term for far-right and white nationalist social media users who are terminally online and follow white supremacist Nick Fuentes, seemed uneasy in their discussions on 4Chan Friday, with some seeing overlap in the etched messages and typical Groyper humor.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212

As of Friday afternoon, it remained unclear what the motive was in the Kirk shooting, or what the suspect's political views were.


Cox said that a family member of Robinson had told investigators that at a recent family dinner, Robinson had mentioned Kirk’s upcoming Utah Valley event, and “they talked about why they didn’t like him and the viewpoints that he had,” Cox said. “The family member also stated Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/12/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-invs

So groypers think Kirk was full of hate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg most people are like “there’s more than two sides?!” There’s liberals, MAGAs, and ultra MAGA? And MAGA and ultra MAGA hate each other?! WUT??!?

🤯

Nuance is hard for some people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's a photo of Tyler wearing a mask outdoors. That's not MAGA.

emulating ICE?

[Anonymous]

This from the Guardian:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Fuentes gives a eulogy

Also last night after he realized this might be one of his guys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone summarize the political leanings of the shooter?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groypers

So they thought Kirk wasn’t fascist enough?

Pretty much. They were at "Groyper War" with him.

Wow, MAGA on MAGA war.

It’s an internecine gang turf war. MAGA is so gangster!

[Anonymous]

This has made me want to delete social media and never get back on it again. It’s dark now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he so far left that he's right or is he so far right that he's left?

https://www.wvxu.org/politics/2015-07-09/studies-link-political-ideology-with-self-control

He is so far right that he is on the right. There is no "left" here.

Where is your source?

Common sense and understanding the language and memes of people in their early 20's.

[Anonymous]

are the right wing the new circular firing squad?