Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow I went to Drudge to see what the above references and it says Ronan Farrow May have a scoop on a second Kavanaugh accuser. Wow...he’s toast if that’s true. Please let that come out before Dr. Ford is traumatized at the Republican abusive hearing.

Michael Avenatti has been teasing more Kavanaugh stuff on twitter since last night and just posted

I do not bluff. I deliver.

Mayer/Farrow + Avenatti = Kavanaugh withdraws by Tuesday

Yup. Next nominee up.

Transgender Democrat woman. That's all that will be accepted.

Or just someone who's not terrible. We have high standards in this country for our Supreme Court justices: we want them to be not terrible.

Ha! Trump’s going to go Full Jeanine (Pirro) to test your little “just not terrible” theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow I went to Drudge to see what the above references and it says Ronan Farrow May have a scoop on a second Kavanaugh accuser. Wow...he’s toast if that’s true. Please let that come out before Dr. Ford is traumatized at the Republican abusive hearing.

Michael Avenatti has been teasing more Kavanaugh stuff on twitter since last night and just posted

I do not bluff. I deliver.

Mayer/Farrow + Avenatti = Kavanaugh withdraws by Tuesday

Yup. Next nominee up.

Transgender Democrat woman. That's all that will be accepted.

Or just someone who's not terrible. We have high standards in this country for our Supreme Court justices: we want them to be not terrible.

Yep. A not terrible functioning adult. Is that really so much to ask??

[Anonymous]

Mark my words , basic bitch Kavanaugh will end up broke (wait .. he’s broke already ) and living with his parents . It’s obvious he has no business being a federal judge . At this point even if he withdraws his nomination he still needs to resign his federal judgeship .




As an aside, the current presidency and it’s ocdupany are without a doubt one of the worst we’ve seen but let’s not forget how despicable George Bush is . He and his deer in headlights wife voiced their support for Kavanaugh the other day and here we are with a new round of disturbing allegations . Do not normalize Bush under no circumstance .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone being interviewed last week on a conservative talk show said "The Dems will trot out a bunch of allegations on Sunday evening. Just watch. It's what they do". And look at that!

That is because the GOP Senators KNEW about all of this last week when they were trying to ensure the vote would be on Thursday.

Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley and anyone else who supported this knowing that Brett Kavanaugh May have participated in a gang rape need to resign. Now.

Are you trolling? Or do you just like posting absurdities?

PP might have been trolling. I am not. The senate republicans who wanted to rush this nomination through knowing about these allegations without asking for an Investigation should resign. They are not serving their role in the constitution.

[Anonymous]

Nothing yet from Twittler?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think I'm going to get a bunch of conservative women together to start accusing democrat men of sexual assault. We'll call their place of work, call their wives, etc.

Be my guest.

[Anonymous]

So to sum up, I’m not discounting the Yale party allegation, but what will do him in, I think, is the evidence the tweeting attorney has stated he will present in the coming days regarding the house party allegations. That will dovetail, more or less, with the credibility analysis of the first allegation. There’s no way out of this for Judge K. The rights of the accused must always — always — be respected and faithfully adhered to. I’m an old enough Democrat to know that, and I have been both a prosecutor and a defense attorney. But this is not a civil or criminal trial. The standard for “proving” unfitness is much lower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone being interviewed last week on a conservative talk show said "The Dems will trot out a bunch of allegations on Sunday evening. Just watch. It's what they do". And look at that!

That is because the GOP Senators KNEW about all of this last week when they were trying to ensure the vote would be on Thursday.

Mitch McConnell, Chuck Grassley and anyone else who supported this knowing that Brett Kavanaugh May have participated in a gang rape need to resign. Now.

Are you trolling? Or do you just like posting absurdities?

There’s nothing absurd in what I wrote. They knew these allegations were coming, that they’re credible. I do not understand how foul, how loathesome, how absolutely odious you GOPers have become. I know you’d been on a downward trajectory since you cozied up to the Evangelicals and how much steeper the slope got when you elevated Newt Gingrich... but you need to re-examine your horribleness. They knew about this. It was a feature, not a bug. And they wanted to elevate someone with these kinds of accusations, this number of accusations against him, to the Supreme Court. They need to step down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think I'm going to get a bunch of conservative women together to start accusing democrat men of sexual assault. We'll call their place of work, call their wives, etc.

Classic GOP smear tactics. Try this. No one will be surprised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else think it’s scary that those with power and influence can come forward with bogus claims and destroy someone’s life just because they don’t like your politics? I’m a woman and not one shred of my being believes any of this. It’s simply not credible or substantiated in any way. This kind of underhanded slander that can come out of nowhere and destroy someone for no reason is truly alarming.

I'm a woman and I believe it all. I believe the friends and supporters who think the nominee would never comport himself like this.
He's an aggressive drunk, and apparently only behaves like this when drunk. It's easy to accept that the circle who has never been with him at a high school or college party sees a completely different side of him than the much more restricted circle who was with him when he behaved badly. It is easy to see that if he and some witnesses were drunk, they cannot remember the incidents. Only the non-drinkers and the ones who were assaulted but weren't completely in a stupor can remember. That's why there are precious few witnesses.

Others have explained why women could not come forward in previous decades to complain about such treatment, and others have explained why victims are moved to come forward now, because the nominee is up for a job of greater magnitude and power over other women than your average lawyer or banker.

The only one I don't believe is the nominee. Instead of saying: "I don't remember these incidents", which might be true, he says: "I never did this". That is a lie, because there are plenty of corroborated accounts among his own friends and supporters that he used to become very drunk at parties. And when you're that drunk, *you don't remember*. The only piece of evidence in this entire sad situation is that Brett Kavanaugh is a proven liar.

And as history has shown, it's the lie that's punished, not the crime!

Very well said, could not agree more. I have thought from the beginning that Kavanaugh likely does not remember any of this. By his own account (high school yearbook and speech to the Federalist Society at Yale Law) and corroborated by many others he was a binge drinker/ blackout drunk for almost a decade (junior in high school through end of law school). That in itself is concerning. Has he stopped drinking? If he is not an alcoholic now (recovering or otherwise) he is one of the very lucky ones. It’s very easy to believe he has no memory of these assaults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing yet from Twittler?

They knocked him out with pills hours ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think I'm going to get a bunch of conservative women together to start accusing democrat men of sexual assault. We'll call their place of work, call their wives, etc.

Nice display of that conservative value, lying.

What's good for the goose, right? Let's get some #metoo going in the other direction. You won't know if it's true or not and according to your rules, you have to believe me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow I went to Drudge to see what the above references and it says Ronan Farrow May have a scoop on a second Kavanaugh accuser. Wow...he’s toast if that’s true. Please let that come out before Dr. Ford is traumatized at the Republican abusive hearing.

Michael Avenatti has been teasing more Kavanaugh stuff on twitter since last night and just posted

I do not bluff. I deliver.

Mayer/Farrow + Avenatti = Kavanaugh withdraws by Tuesday

Yup. Next nominee up.

Transgender Democrat woman. That's all that will be accepted.

Or just someone who's not terrible. We have high standards in this country for our Supreme Court justices: we want them to be not terrible.

Ha! Trump’s going to go Full Jeanine (Pirro) to test your little “just not terrible” theory.

Bring it on, nothing could help dems more with midterms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So to sum up, I’m not discounting the Yale party allegation, but what will do him in, I think, is the evidence the tweeting attorney has stated he will present in the coming days regarding the house party allegations. That will dovetail, more or less, with the credibility analysis of the first allegation. There’s no way out of this for Judge K. The rights of the accused must always — always — be respected and faithfully adhered to. I’m an old enough Democrat to know that, and I have been both a prosecutor and a defense attorney. But this is not a civil or criminal trial. The standard for “proving” unfitness is much lower.

And that is the sick, sick game here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mark my words , basic bitch Kavanaugh will end up broke (wait .. he’s broke already ) and living with his parents . It’s obvious he has no business being a federal judge . At this point even if he withdraws his nomination he still needs to resign his federal judgeship .




As an aside, the current presidency and it’s ocdupany are without a doubt one of the worst we’ve seen but let’s not forget how despicable George Bush is . He and his deer in headlights wife voiced their support for Kavanaugh the other day and here we are with a new round of disturbing allegations . Do not normalize Bush under no circumstance .

Amen to that. The degree to which the media has been praising Bush lately sickens me. Maybe it’s just how he looks in comparison to Trump, but I don’t care. His was the second worst presidency ever.