FCPS comprehensive boundary review

Anonymous
All of this points to the fact that FCPS never should have been expanding schools at every renovation but should have been using space available at nearby schools to solve capacity issues. West Potomac, Herndon, West Springfield, Madison, etc.

Waste of taxpayer dollars and a vote of no confidence in certain schools by the Board when they refused to use boundary changes to send students to those schools. Now people think their school should automatically get an expansion when they are at or over capacity when we should be moving students. The Board set a bad precedent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


This. I grew up abroad and when you were dissatisfied with the state run service (health, schools) you sacrificed, saved up, and paid for the private option. We are lucky to have choices in this country. Nobody is forcing you to send your kid to the “gang infested” school.


No crap. That’s obviously what we are doing.

Though the correct answer would be to fix that problem rather than take students from safer schools and put them in unsafe schools.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


This. I grew up abroad and when you were dissatisfied with the state run service (health, schools) you sacrificed, saved up, and paid for the private option. We are lucky to have choices in this country. Nobody is forcing you to send your kid to the “gang infested” school.


No crap. That’s obviously what we are doing.

Though the correct answer would be to fix that problem rather than take students from safer schools and put them in unsafe schools.


How do you fix Lewis or Mt Vernon?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All of this points to the fact that FCPS never should have been expanding schools at every renovation but should have been using space available at nearby schools to solve capacity issues. West Potomac, Herndon, West Springfield, Madison, etc.

Waste of taxpayer dollars and a vote of no confidence in certain schools by the Board when they refused to use boundary changes to send students to those schools. Now people think their school should automatically get an expansion when they are at or over capacity when we should be moving students. The Board set a bad precedent.


Moving students disrupts the school system more than you realize. It causes disruption in communities and families. Schools do not fall apart because they are overcrowded. Many times the more crowded schools are the more successful ones. Why do people want their kids to stay in those schools?

Renovation and additions can also be disruptive. Some of the issue is lack of routine maintenance. When doors are off bathroom stalls, it is not because of age--let's face it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All of this points to the fact that FCPS never should have been expanding schools at every renovation but should have been using space available at nearby schools to solve capacity issues. West Potomac, Herndon, West Springfield, Madison, etc.

Waste of taxpayer dollars and a vote of no confidence in certain schools by the Board when they refused to use boundary changes to send students to those schools. Now people think their school should automatically get an expansion when they are at or over capacity when we should be moving students. The Board set a bad precedent.


Moving students disrupts the school system more than you realize. It causes disruption in communities and families. Schools do not fall apart because they are overcrowded. Many times the more crowded schools are the more successful ones. Why do people want their kids to stay in those schools?

Renovation and additions can also be disruptive. Some of the issue is lack of routine maintenance. When doors are off bathroom stalls, it is not because of age--let's face it.


Because they have successfully isolated a large proportion of the poor, ESL population in the other schools??? I mean, the true answer is to get to the root of the problem, but blue voters have prevented that for years while at the same time avoiding the consequences.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


The root causes are not fixable. IB is just an excuse to transfer not an actual problem. Either they just give up on the schools or they rezone to try an fill them. Pushing families into those schools is going to infuriate them. Doing it while maintaining laughably economically segregated schools isn't going to happen especially when those schools border higher farms rate schools
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


THIS! People care about their kids. What is the first thing people ask when looking for a house? You cannot disregard that --no matter how many times you say there is no assurance. Look for the market to slide if this continues.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


The root cause is uncontrolled immigration for 25-30 years. That is the simple fact.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All of this points to the fact that FCPS never should have been expanding schools at every renovation but should have been using space available at nearby schools to solve capacity issues. West Potomac, Herndon, West Springfield, Madison, etc.

Waste of taxpayer dollars and a vote of no confidence in certain schools by the Board when they refused to use boundary changes to send students to those schools. Now people think their school should automatically get an expansion when they are at or over capacity when we should be moving students. The Board set a bad precedent.


When you have gone far enough down a certain road, it's an even worse precedent to abandon that to the detriment of the limited number of remaining schools. All it does is tell people that the School Board doesn't have a clue what it's doing and is prepared to rob Peter to pay Paul.

Far-right folks who object to every tax bill and far-left liberals who salivate at the opportunity to stick it to certain schools they deem "privileged" find this prospect enticing. Many of us in the middle consider it an abomination, and the county really isn't going to benefit when the tax base inevitably declines due to FCPS's incompetence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


The root causes are not fixable. IB is just an excuse to transfer not an actual problem. Either they just give up on the schools or they rezone to try an fill them. Pushing families into those schools is going to infuriate them. Doing it while maintaining laughably economically segregated schools isn't going to happen especially when those schools border higher farms rate schools


A very large percentage of high school transfers involve IB students transferring to AP schools or vice versa. FCPS has twice as many AP schools as IB, and IB is more expensive per student, so having AP at all or almost all the schools would reduce costs and also reduce pupil placements out of schools like Lewis and Mount Vernon, which are both IB, as well as out of Herndon, which is AP. Planning would become easier with more predicable enrollments and fewer pupil placements.

I don't really know what the rest of your post is getting at. Yes, if families feel their kids are being rezoned into different schools for purely expedient reasons by a school system that isn't doing the hard work to make those schools more attractive, they are going to object. Some will have no other options, and will go along with the changes, but there will be further attrition from FCPS and an exit of higher-income taxpayers from the county. Neither of these things is in Fairfax's long-term interests.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


The root causes are not fixable. IB is just an excuse to transfer not an actual problem. Either they just give up on the schools or they rezone to try an fill them. Pushing families into those schools is going to infuriate them. Doing it while maintaining laughably economically segregated schools isn't going to happen especially when those schools border higher farms rate schools


A very large percentage of high school transfers involve IB students transferring to AP schools or vice versa. FCPS has twice as many AP schools as IB, and IB is more expensive per student, so having AP at all or almost all the schools would reduce costs and also reduce pupil placements out of schools like Lewis and Mount Vernon, which are both IB, as well as out of Herndon, which is AP. Planning would become easier with more predicable enrollments and fewer pupil placements.

I don't really know what the rest of your post is getting at. Yes, if families feel their kids are being rezoned into different schools for purely expedient reasons by a school system that isn't doing the hard work to make those schools more attractive, they are going to object. Some will have no other options, and will go along with the changes, but there will be further attrition from FCPS and an exit of higher-income taxpayers from the county. Neither of these things is in Fairfax's long-term interests.


Why do people want students to not pupil place from Lewis or Mt. Vernon....it's an awfully transparent attempt at classism, racism, etc. Are you really scared of these students transferring from these schools?
Nobody talks about the other side of the pyramid and kids placing from Herndon to langley.
Anonymous
IB is the easiest excuse for pupil placement. Remove it and the same students leaving now will find other reasons. If anything, it's an escape valve for the families who would be the loudest complaining about their kids getting substandard educations if they were forced into those schools. There is no way to make Lewis or Mt Vernon acceptable to a family currently zoned for West Springfield or Hayfield or even West Potomac. The composition of the student body means that resources will be focused on remediation and that any class not on the highest track is going to move at a snails pace at best.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do the people representing each pyramid all have children currently enrolled in FCPS?


No they do not, this was confirmed at the Mount Vernon community meeting when one of the community reps had only older children who had already graduated.
I think this is good. Most adults in Fairfax County do not have children in the schools, but since they are also part of the community and also pay taxes that fund the schools, they should have a say too.


Except when this argument is applied to the immigration issue, the same folks say stfu "just because you pay property taxes doesn't mean your kid has priority over the new arrival undocumented ESL kids". So yeah miss me with this. They should not have an equal say as parents with children in FCPS.


Parents already have an outsized role here, not asking for parity - but it’s nice that some of the committee member represent the majority.
If you don’t include their voices, you will have a problem with community support and a much harder time paying for it all.


Yeah, I’ve always thought that the key to better schools is getting more people who don’t have any significant stake more involved. 🙄
Thinking that people who live in your community with no children in public schools means they do not have a stake in the public schools is not correct. Of course they have a stake. They are part of the community.


Thinking that non parents should have more than minimal representation on the committee that primarily affects school kids is like saying I should have a say in the California interstate Highway system because I drive there once every couple of years.


+1
2 or 3 seats out of 50 would be the right amount of voice. The vast majority should have been parents.


According to the census, there are 412,663 households in Fairfax County. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fairfaxcountyvirginia/HSD410223#HSD410223

According to FCPS, there are almost 183,000 students in FCPS.

Some households have more than one adult and some households have more than one child in the public schools. So, any guesses for what percentage of adults in the county have no children currently in the schools? My guess is between 60-70%.

You seem to be saying that the very large majority of households with no children currently enrolled in the public schools only deserve 4-6% representation. I am not suggesting that it should be commensurate with the population or even close to it, but it should be more than 4-6%. Perhaps, 2-3 seats for those with under 5 year olds, 2-3 seats for those whose children are within 5 years of their high school graduation and 2-3 for the others.


DP. My biggest issue with the whole process is that the school board has intentionally marginalized the very families who will be most affected by the changes. That’s of course intentional but it’s just so richly ironic that the left now seeks to silence its victims.

It's ironic that all your assumptions are based on conspiracy.


DP. It all starts with the fact that no one associated with FCPS has remotely made a compelling case for boundary adjustments at a time when enrollment is flat and birth rates are declining. Add to that the fact that, as discussed earlier, the purported benefits described by FCPS seem contrived.

All told, it feels like we’re being asked to go along with some Orwellian farce, where anything can be done to advance an “equity” agenda, so long as that word is replaced with “efficiency” as often as possible.

Maybe the concerns expressed by posters here will turn out to be unfounded, and the scale of the changes will be more modest and aligned with what the affected communities actually want. If so, that will be despite the lack of candor on the part of Reid and the School Board, and largely due to people finding other avenues to express their concerns even when Reid and the School Board tried their hardest to orchestrate a process where those concerns would be ignored.


Overall enrollment is flat to declining but that isn’t true across the system. Enrollment is projected to decline in many boundaries but increase in other boundaries. That’s a great argument for redistricting. Reading through this thread, many say the solution for those growing areas is not redistricting but school expansions (“other schools got them so we should too”). But both FCPS administration and the school board have said in the last year that FCPS cannot afford to undertake the extensive renovations and expansions it has pursued to date, and that, given budget realities and interest rates, FCPS needs to focus its capital budget on renovstions that are much more limited in scope, i.e., which are necessary to keep its aging facilities / construction safe for children. In other words, more capacity isn’t coming where needed and FCPS needs to live within its means, so kids need to be moved.


“We screwed up and added seats where they weren’t most needed, so now we’re going to move your kids to Herndon to cover up our mistakes. Otherwise we can’t keep giving ourselves raises. Please accept our apologies.”

Why is moving some kids to Herndon so terrible? Do your kids know any current students? From what we hear, it’s not a hell-hole as many hear believe it to be.


I’m not interested in anyone trying to convince me where I should send my kids, especially when there is a bigger gang presence in that school. That’s a full stop for us. Hard no.


No one is trying to convince you. They are going to draw lines and you are free to accept them, move, or pay for private school


DP. The question for you is why you apparently think it's a good thing for them to redraw the lines when the main reason the lines may be redrawn is to gloss over their own incompetence. Accepting this is tantamount to rewarding them for malfeasance.


They are going to push families into Lewis and Mt Vernon. Doing that while leaving Langley alone won't happen. You don't have to like it, but having a school with less than 5% FARMS while pushing kids into majority FARMS schools isn't going to happen


This assumes an outcome, and then assumes further outcomes based on political considerations or "optics" rather than sound planning.

Moving more kids into Lewis and Mount Vernon is a band-aid that doesn't address the root causes for why these schools have low enrollments. The most obvious root causes are IB, safety concerns, and liberal pupil placement. In Mount Vernon's case, it serves Ft. Belvoir, and military families there have placement options that FCPS can't alter. Hayfield, an AP school, gets a large number of MV kids every year.

They need to address the root causes first before reassigning kids. Otherwise, they are just encouraging more families to exit FCPS.

There is no need to move anyone out of Langley unless it's overcrowded, and the optics of moving kids out of a recently expanded middle school (Cooper) into one with less capacity (Herndon MS) aren't great, either.

A far more reasonable and politically astute approach would be to announce that FCPS is taking a deep dive into the need for AAP centers and IB programs, and updating the outdated 2008 renovation queue, before any boundary changes are implemented. As a fallback, in the short term, they could simply eliminate ES attendance islands, and only change the MS/HS assignments for those islands with the consent of the affected communities.

Instead, they are over-selling a product for which there is limited demand, and putting the future electability of many local Democratic politicians in jeopardy.


The root causes are not fixable. IB is just an excuse to transfer not an actual problem. Either they just give up on the schools or they rezone to try an fill them. Pushing families into those schools is going to infuriate them. Doing it while maintaining laughably economically segregated schools isn't going to happen especially when those schools border higher farms rate schools


A very large percentage of high school transfers involve IB students transferring to AP schools or vice versa. FCPS has twice as many AP schools as IB, and IB is more expensive per student, so having AP at all or almost all the schools would reduce costs and also reduce pupil placements out of schools like Lewis and Mount Vernon, which are both IB, as well as out of Herndon, which is AP. Planning would become easier with more predicable enrollments and fewer pupil placements.

I don't really know what the rest of your post is getting at. Yes, if families feel their kids are being rezoned into different schools for purely expedient reasons by a school system that isn't doing the hard work to make those schools more attractive, they are going to object. Some will have no other options, and will go along with the changes, but there will be further attrition from FCPS and an exit of higher-income taxpayers from the county. Neither of these things is in Fairfax's long-term interests.


Why do people want students to not pupil place from Lewis or Mt. Vernon....it's an awfully transparent attempt at classism, racism, etc. Are you really scared of these students transferring from these schools?
Nobody talks about the other side of the pyramid and kids placing from Herndon to langley.


The goal should be to make these schools more attractive to their current populations, rather than expand the boundaries and just end up with more kids pupil placing out of these schools, which just reinforces the message that these schools are problematic and that FCPS's purported solutions are ineffective.

Herndon and Langley are both AP, and the limited number of students pupil placing from Herndon to Langley are taking a foreign language available at Langley but not Herndon. You could consider adding those languages to Herndon and other schools, or eliminating them from Langley and making them on-line courses, but in general pupil placements for a foreign language are a small fraction of total pupil placements compared to pupil placements for IB vs. AP. They aren't large enough in numbers to be particularly relevant to a discussion about boundary changes due to schools being over capacity or under enrolled.
Anonymous
Will there be poors?
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: